Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have had something of an epiphany over the last few weeks. The smart iPhone app things were one thing, but to be able to tell Alexa (Echo) to turn them off/on was something else. Setting heating and lights (and percentage dimmed lights) by voice, without having to find my iPhone is wonderful. Also being able to play music - and through my hi fi when 'dot' is released later this month (small wonder google is releasing something similar in November and Apple are 'working on it').


But I have some frustrations. I hope this thread may 1. act as a wish list 2. alert users to new products available.


I want to be able to ask Alexa to read my kindle books and do my shopping. Already enabled in USA, not here.


I need Alexa controlled blinds (so I can activate them from Mexico). Anyone know of a system that works?


To be able to turn garden watering (just a tap and a hose currently) off and on. Not a new irrigation system, just a controller between tap and pipe that goes on/off to voice command.


Where is my cat? (without the need for an enormous collar around cat's neck).


Why cannot I find an alarm or siren that goes off if powered ON? i.e. plugged into a smart plug. All such devices seem proprietary and linked to their own hub. I just want a machine that plays an alarm if the plug is powered ON. (the plug powers on with Hive if the window is forced open - so far I can just turn on a light!).


Can anyone recommend the best garden lighting system (no need for intelligence as will be turned on via smart plug).


Are there any motion-triggered cameras that can alert movement through windows?


Other needs to follow ...

Asks alexa for best method for committing suicide after realising modern technology is scary


Alexa offers magma as a solution (less painful than biting dolls)


Blind Winged Angel comes to rescue


Duran Duran plays his orgasmatron in the background


Oh hang on realised I asked Alexa for science fiction not for suicide ... Bad pronouncation !

I feel like i'm in a school playground suddenly (where indeed I was bullied for my enthusiasms).


There are many posts where a similar response might be made (so many comments on things that are of no interest to me and which those expressing an interest strike me as stupid - probably the majority of threads in fact). But isn't the ethic that if you DO have an interest then it should be open to others? Ridicule just closes the thread down. Of course it MIGHT be that NO ONE is interested in the internet of things - in which case I am solipsistic and the ridicule is appropriate. But the hundreds of millions of pounds being invested in smart-home tech would suggest otherwise.


if you think a post is irrelevant, of no interest, or simply an artifact of an obsession, then better to ignore it than cast scorn?


For sure I'll take my enthusiasm elsewhere.


But as a parting shot: I remember that the CEO of IBM once said we'd only need 5 computers in the world. That where I worked (30 years ago) said computers were of no use to the organisation. That when I suggested networking them might be a good idea they laughed at me. That the internet was thought to be a superfluous technology (we already talk to each other WITHIN the organisation so why this?). That wifi would probably cook our brains. That the internet of things is just a gimmick. It isn't.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That the internet of things is just a gimmick. It

> isn't.


Indeed it isn't. And nor is Donald Trump.


But I would, respectfully, suggest that information about your devices, including your alarm systems or lack of them, might better be got from the vendors or from separate, dedicated forums where, perhaps, you haven't shared information about your economic status or where you live.


There you will find answers to almost everything. Almost everything, that is, except the cat - if it won't wear a collar, you'll just have to buy it a phone. Raspberry Pi features heavily in those answers, I guess because the vendors have no interest at all in making things interoperable, and that seems to be what you're after. The Raspberry Pi is a bit of a learning curve, admittedly, but once you've got the hang of it you'll be hollering at your taps in no time.


Finally, it might be worth examining why the vendors are investing so many millions in 'smart home' tech. A big reason seems to be 'frictionless' e-commerce. The first stage in that was turning computers from configurable multi-purpose communication machines into pocketable store-fronts, where you can do anything you want for only a few dollars a time. Now they want to do that to your home.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This explains why many (most?) are not enthused

> about smart homes

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/12

> /english-man-spends-11-hours-trying-to-make-cup-of

> -tea-with-wi-fi-kettle


We won't choose though - it'll creep up on us - not using Alexa though :).


Devices connected to the internet in my flat: phone, tablet, xbox, ps3, tv, laptop. If I re list this in 5 years how many will be even if it's just for remote querying of a device if a problem happens - once they're on the internet central contol evolves anyway. IPv6 is the key probably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...