Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A tenner says the lotto winners will move...and if I lose...they'll pay :))


The reform of Housing Finaince is reform of the housing Revenue Subsidy System which is in fact a plan drawn up by the previous Labour government but which the Coalition have decided to implement. At present central government creams off a percentage of rental income collected by local authorities and then gives part of it back under the dubious title of 'subsidy'. In addition local authorities can borrow money for capaital programmes.


Under the new system, local authorities will get to keep most of the rental income they collect but will have the amount they can borrow capped by central government. That cap will be set according to what central government thinks the local authority should be collecting in rents irregardless of what it actually does collect or not. We are still waiting to see the first figures for the new system but estimates suggest that Southwark may be around ?9million worse off each year......whilst having had almost ?300million of current outstanding debt written off at the start of the new system (Southwarks current capital debts are at around ?700million).


The other reforms will still need to go through the parliamentary process and may or may not get through. My feelings are that the other reforms will have very little impact on the current shortage of available social housing or the lack of three and four bedroom homes. The fact is that in Southwark, existing housing stock just doesn't have the needed number of homes of that size. The average number of bids on a three or four bedroomed council homes is 300 each time one appears in the homsesearch magazine...and that is just from existing tenants needing bigger properties for their families. The bottom line is that we need to build more affordable housing and stop selling off the social housing we do still have. The coalition are doing nothing to tackle the over inflated housing market and it's consequences.


There are other issues too. The coalition have drastically cut the money for decent homes. It won't even pay for 20% of the outstanding work to be done. So any talk by the coalition of commitment to decent homes is bs I'm afraid.


By the way James, under the current laws, a succeded tenant can not be forced to move within six months of succession, or after a year from succession. It's absolutely fair and plenty of other local authorities use it..... The fact that Southwark chose not to make suceeded tenants downsize is unacceptable given how many families are crammed into one and two bedroomed flats whilst single suceeded tenants live in three and four bedroomed properties.

Hi DJKillaQueen,

The advice from council officers that colleagues have been shown is that Southwark council housing might be ?1M worse of per year BUT it will have far less bureaucy to contend with. As the Housing Revenue Account is a huge account with hundreds of millions this should be perfectly manageable.

I agree the new system will be an improvement and simpler to understand, without making much difference to tenants or the rents they pay. Everything will depend on the government getting their calculations right of course regarding the borrowing caps, but apart from that it should work for the better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our camera caught two folks doing this. One of them led me to believe the delivery driver was in on it as he left the package in a very odd place that the thief (who arrived about 10 minutes after from a direction where he could not have seen where the driver left it) went straight to it and took it - but he then dumped it halfway down the next road as clearly packets of freeze-dried food for a DofE award wasn't to his liking (karma sucks!). The second time a guy pulled his bike up in broad daylight, walked down to our door, opened the box, threw the empty box down and stuffed what he had found in his backpack and brazenly waved at the camera and then cycled off. Police asked us to upload his picture but we never heard anything back.
    • I hear that Landells Road has had a spate of parcels being taken,
    • In the 1960s my husband went to a private day school, Although he was a bright child having won a couple of scholarships to other private schools, his father chose this particular one. He went from 11 - 14 years and left as unhappy with the set up which was based on ethnicity. All boys with both parents English were placed in the A stream regardless of academic ability, Boys with an Irish background were placed in B stream. All others were C streamed - this included boys with a Black or Asian  background, mixed race or mixed European background. His schooldays came to an end when he wished to learn Latin and he was told that no boy in C stream could participate in this subject. His father (not English) was very upset at this and withdrew him from the school and sent him  to a country boarding school.  The experiences he had with his schooling culminated in a breakdown of his mental health and several months in Maudsley. He had low self esteem and it took several decades for him to understand that it was the school system and not his ability which had failed him
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...