Jump to content

I hate all the mothers and mothers-to-be that have inflitrated East Dulwich in recent years


Recommended Posts

These women are vile, and should have remained firmly esconced in Wandsworth (or wherever it is they've wandered over from). I can't walk around East Dulwich these days without some gargantuan 'trendy' buggie blocking my path, or some enormous girth being proudly displayed by some woman (40+ years old, if a day).


Which brings me on to the ages of these women: many are so-o-o-o old. Dulwich Park really highlights the fact that these women had children pretty late in life. I've no doubt they had professional jobs in days of yore - but my God, how they've embraced mummyhood. It's all they bleat on about. Dulwich Park has become a no go zone for me these days. I hope these women avoid Peckham Rye Park.


The Dads are almost as bad. They are largely absent, earning in the City no doubt, but when they're about they're like some HORRIBLE kiddie's TV presenter. It's vomit inducing hearing them singing nursery rhymes and trying to make up for their absences.


It is getting to the point where I avoid East Dulwich as much as possible (despite being from the area, and living there too). These women are rude, and very superficial. When they're not stuffing an (organic) rice cake in their sprog's gob, they're taking up all the room in the Blue Mountain with their buggies, offspring and gaggle of acuaintances. Note I didn't say 'friend': these women don't 'do' friends but acquaintances. They deciode they have oddles in common - because they have a kid(s).

Gets my vote for the most stereotypical, prejudiced nonsense I've read for a long time.

Should baby M express any interest in playing the piano later in life, we will be giving you and your bile a very wide berth.

Very funny.


Hope it's meant to be a joke and not the insane ramblings of a raisin ovaried embittered infertile.


That said I will be singing Mary Poppins loud and proud up and down lordship Lane all weekend to make up for staying until 6.30 tonight...

Nice one, Margaret! As a music teacher seeking pupils, you've done a fine job of alienating approximately 90% of your potential target market. Well, they say that no publicity is bad publicity, so here's your original 'piano lesson' posting again. You sure sound like a wonderful person for children to learn with. I'll be in touch when *Bob* Junior is a little older!


My name's Margaret, and I am an accomplished classically trained musician who holds the LRAM music teaching diploma. I have been teaching piano for many years, and I pride myself on making the piano fun and accessible to all my pupils. I encourage my students to have the confidence to play a wide variety of musical genres by ear - as well as teaching how to read music proficiently.


My current pupils are aged between 5 - 90 (yes, it's never too late to learn!), and the majority of them achieve distinctions (i.e. the highest grades) in their Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music Theory, Classical music and Jazz piano exams. Testimonials are available. I also teach pupils who don't want to take exams, but just want to learn how to play Blues, Latin, Jazz, Pop music - and more!


I've maintained a private teaching studio since the 1970's, and all ages and skill levels are welcome. I teach 30 and 60 minute lessons, depending on your requirements. Prices range from ?18 - ?35, depending on the length of the lesson. I teach in Netherby Road SE23, which is just off Forest Hill Road SE22 opposite St. Francesca Cabrini Primary school.

as she's the registered user.

I suppose it could be her mischievous child, bored on school holiday and margaret is anive enough to leave her login details on her PC.

In which case a clip round the ear is probably in order.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...