Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Plymouth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To the negatives in the group i think you all need

> to grow up. Fighting screaming and vomiting,

> please, and every weekend? Adventure had their

> trial period of 2am finishing and it worked, you

> making it sound like a bad day in beirut. It's on

> the lane, out of the way and unless you live with

> 5 seconds on that place i doubt quite highly that

> this is going to cause any real bother. If people

> want a drink till 2, let them, and since when did

> Dulwich become so bloody high and mighty, i

> absolutely love this area and the occasional 2am

> finish is fine by me. Do we really have to worry

> about this? If it's vomit you are worried about

> give me a call and i'll come and clean it up

> myself.


Ah well if the occasional 2am finish is fine by you then everybody else best shut up and do what you say!!


Jesus, what's the view like from having your head up your own arse?!?!?

Heh, I think everyone's got a bit heated on this so I'll try and bring it back a bit. I live a lot more than 5 seconds from the Adventure Bar, and it's not every weekend, but it's often enough that the designated driver has left his/her car near my house and the drunken passengers vocalise their walk back down our side street. It wouldn't be so bad if there was ambient noise but it's dead quiet here otherwise so their voices cut through the night waking us up. And sometimes they puke up on the way, or have a laugh smacking all the wing mirrors on their way back to the car.

If it's a weekend we grumble and go back to sleep - yes we were young once - but the days after Thursday and Sunday will be school nights come September and it's not fair on the kids. Maybe you've not noticed but there's a lot of them round here.

James Plymouth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By all means, because clearly you and all the

> other pathetic people ALL live on the lane and are

> all going to lose sleep over this, lets ask the

> police and see whether they have had to be called

> to all these supposed 'disruptions'. Yes you are

> right about people having their opinions, it's

> great we can all find somewhere to talk about all

> the really important things that are going to

> decimate our everyday lives, i suppose you lot all

> contribute to charity too. Is this the only thing

> disrupting your lives? I hope they leave a

> traffic cone shoved with dog mess in your prized

> magnolias.


This could have, of course, a positive effect!

  • 3 weeks later...

That will be welcome news for those residents that opposed and it is interesting to note that anti-social behaviour and under aged drinking were cited as reasons in part for refusal.


Southwark Licensing do take complaints and breaches seriously so use them if ever you have issues with a licensed premise.

"... Having heard from the applicant and Mr Blissett, the LSC was satisfied that the applicant had taken satisfactory steps to address the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance by reason of the escape of music from the premises. Having considered the written representations of local residents and having heard from those residents present, the LSC was not satisfied that the applicant had adequately addressed the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance in so far as it related to anti-social behaviour as aggravated by the excessive consumption of alcohol.


"The LSC noted that two sixteen year old girls had recently been admitted to the premises and had been served alcoholic cocktails. The LSC was not satisfied that the bar staff and door staff were taking adequate steps to refuse entry and service to those under the influence of alcohol. The LSC noted that the premises had no outdoor space and that many complaints related to the consequences of drunken behaviour outside the premises and in nearby streets, in particular, fighting, shouting, slamming of card doors, public urination and vomiting. The LSC noted that Mr Jackson (the DPS) visited the premises once or twice a week and appeared to be unaware of these problems which residents stated had been exacerbated since the licence was varied on 20 April 2009. The LSC noted that resident A20 (page 62 of the agenda) complained of nuisance on three occasions when a Temporary Event Notice (TEN) had been granted in July 2010.


"Accordingly the LSC considered it was both necessary and proportionate, having regard to the licensing objective of the prevention of nuisance to refuse the application in so far is it related to the extension of hours for licensable activities..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...