Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Page 15. He's a local boy, I've definitely seem him around town.

Props to him for his campaign to get himself on telly as much as possible. There should be all sorts on screen, not just young attractive people. Bit sad that he describes himself as 'quite unsightly' though, I'd say he's just normal looking.

(And I don't think there's anything wrong with discussing him on the forum given the nature of his campaign, and the coverage).

I thought madger?s original post was exactly the right way to go about drumming up support and was so well-expressed I nearly signed up, until I remembered I don?t agree (with all of it anyway)


I agree that Goose Green to Budgens is pretty grim on a Friday and Saturday nights ? but if it?s possible to have long drinking hours in other countries, my interest would be in unravelling why it seems to cause such problems here

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a special page for girls, Rosie. It's

> called 'Femail'. Do you see what they did there?

> Femail. Makes me chuckle.


Oooooooh I do. I do see what they did there. Aren't they clever? They're ever so clever those boys they are. Well done them. I'd have gone and called it something crass like: "Give this part to the little lady so you can read about crime and norks in peace" but see they were MUCH cleverer than that. I'd go so far as to say that's the pinnacle of British journalism, and no mistake.

paragon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> he was being interviewed by a Camera crew outside

> Emily's Fish Bar about 20 mins ago.



-------------------------------------------


Puleeze....



Don't tell me he's taken up the plight of "The Vanishing Cod"


( that will be the death knell for them )



I can see the "banner" now....


"A Cod isn't for supper, it's for Life"


&


"Fish don't have Fingers , but they do have Feelings "




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process"  
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
    • Sue, if you put on a Dog mask, I'm.sure Bob will say "nice bit of wensleydale Grommit?" to you at the drinks 
    • What, a Brie tasting?  I'd rather have an animal mask than have to eat Brie 🤮
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...