Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So compared to a live-out nanny that's ?100 cheaper, which is approx the same as rent in the area?

so that makes sense really?


But there's no synergies. I.e. you could just as easily rent the room out and they'd be no financial difference. Although it's nicer to have the nanny around all the time for the children and means they can easily babysit too.


rather clinical all this but needs must....

If you go for a live in au pair - it is much more affordable. They generally are limited to 20 or so hours a week, or, you can opt to pay more for more hours. We have paid from 60 - 90pounds per week for our au pairs, according to our needs, etc. Our hours have been fairly minimal. Plus food. Room, location, etc make little difference as to the pay, but, a good person will expect a decent room, wifi access, and a good degree of personal freedom and space. A bicycle is also handy.

I might add that au pairs are not professionally qualified as a nannie is - hence the pay difference. From our experience au pairs are great - you will spend a few weeks helping them understand your families needs, but, we've had many success stories here...


We found most of ours on universalaupairs.com - a really useful source.

Saila Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> But there's no synergies. I.e. you could just as

> easily rent the room out and they'd be no

> financial difference.

Except you'd pay tax on the income


Though if a nanny gets accommodation, is that taxed anyway?

of course tax.. is this how it'd work?


1. Live-in nanny pay and tax

e.g. 350 and 150 total 500 per week

total ?2,150 per month assuming 4.3 weeks / month

total tax 150 / week


2. Rent a room 430 a month less tax of 13

live out nanny costing 650

total 2,378 per month assuming 4.3 weeks / month (?100 a week rent)

total tax approx 200 a week


3. Rent a room 645 a month less tax of ?47 is 598 a month

live out nany costs 650 a week

total 2,197 per month assuming 4.3 weeks/ month (?150 rent)

total tax 250


so it's cheaper to have a live in nanny depending on how much you can rent the room out separately

if you can get >?150 per week for your attic room or whatever, then it's worth having a live out nanny but it'd still be marginal


is this right?

looks like live-in is best option financially

It doesn't look to me like you have the correct tax for the room rental... if you exceed the 4250 allwed tax free under the rent aroom scheme, then you pay tax on the whole profit (ie income less any expenses)


I don't quite follow your calcs re the live in nanny... 500 gross pay 350 + 150 tax? I suspect tax is chargeable on the benefit in kind (accmomodation)


http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/exb/a-z/l/accommodation.htm

If your gross income is above the rent-a-room limit

If you receive more than ?4,250 (or ?2,125) you can choose either to:


A: pay tax on your profits in the normal way for a rental business (by paying tax on your actual profit after deducting expenses); or

B: pay tax on your gross income less the ?4,250 (or ?2,125) limit, with no allowance for expenses.


So for a room at ?100 a week (?5,200) is 950 taxed

950 * 30% is ?20 a month (but this depends on your tax rate?)


the ?350 a week and ?150 is what charlottep said in an earlier post?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...