Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just found this on the planning portal. The existing newsagent at 100 Lordship Lane, 'ED Local', looks like it will be sharing the space with a branch of Subway aka 'eat fresh'. Guessing it will be a franchise? What does everyone think? Welcome addition? Will be handy if it's open late for the post night life crowd wanting a snack on the way home.


http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9568891


http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?GetDocument=%7b%7b%7b!ux9H2xq98bHbAjZyYwj63Q%3d%3d!%7d%7d%7d


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/124945-subway-coming-to-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's borderline junk food, but am not averse to

> the occasional Subway as a bit of a guilty

> pleasure.


I'd leave out the "borderline" :)


And damn, I too thought we were getting a subway under the road! Maybe at that nasty junction opposite The Bishop,!

Can't say the thought excites me but ED, like a lot of gentrified London, has become a place of two parallel lifestyles and there are plenty of people who will probably find it more to their liking and their pocket than W Rose, Moxon's or Franklins.
Their bread is rubbish- they must have employed someone to investigate how much air you can pump into bread before it collapses....also- what is that horrible sour smell in their shops...I have been in several with other people and they all smell weird?

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see it succeeding personally given all the other tastier

> places to eat on the lane with our cafes and bakeries


I think you're kind of missing the point. It's not competing with Boulangerie Jade or Brick House... it's more of an alternative to fried chicken or a kebab.

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It'll be an alternative to Co-op or M&S sarnies at

> lunchtime, for anyone working in the offices on

> the lane.


Everything on the menu is 'reformed meat'.


You'd do far better getting a lamb or chicken wrap from Kebab and Wine, or felafel, for a similar price.

ontheedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember reading subway food is on one of the

> worst type of foods to eat lists, ranks way lower

> than McDonalds, but tries to dress it self up in

> something healthy!


The 12" meatball marinara contains more salt than the recommended daily total for an adult, 42 grams of fat (18g saturated, almost 100% RDA for adult women) and over 1000 calories. Never eaten anything from them myself but friends who have tell me it's actually pretty revolting too!

They might not have very healthy components to their offering, but I reckon almost all local food options - including the new MEATLiqour and Franco Manca, are not exactly 'healthy', cheese, fatty meats, bread bases. When you're on a budget something like Subway is a good addition compared to fried chicken and greasy kebabs, the other local budget options. At least it contains salad.


Louisa.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You'd do far better getting a lamb or chicken wrap

> from Kebab and Wine, or felafel, for a similar

> price.


A shish, potentially. But not a doner, no way. K&W don't do falafel.


ontheedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember reading subway food is on one of the

> worst type of foods to eat lists, ranks way lower

> than McDonalds


source?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • According to https://www.compass-pools.co.uk/learning-centre/news/the-complete-guide-to-swimming-pool-maintenance/: ... "Your weekly tasks should include: ...  Checking the pH levels and adjusting the water balance ... The ideal pH rating of swimming pool water is between 7.0 and 7.6. Anything lower than 7.0 and metals and pool finishes can start to corrode, while anything above 7.8 and there can be issues with scaling due to calcium salts in the water and chlorine becoming ineffective." And for comparison of different pH values, see for example the examples chart at https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/z38bbqt#zb2kkty There are several other sites that can easily be found that say something about variation and correction of pool pH levels.  
    • Perhaps we should all ask Lord Ali to help out as he does seem to help out those that make these charges?
    • I find it worrying that the pH problem was considered  bad enough for the pool to be closed. Something must either have been wrong with the water going into the pool in the first place, or something was added afterwards which shouldn't have been, or in the wrong quantity? Whatever, surely there should be checks every time a change of any kind  is made to the water, and appropriate action taken? Or was this closure a result of such a check? In which case, I wonder what went wrong?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...