Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I dont go to CP Park too often but was jogging around there the other day and I saw this huge rusty structure sticking out of the ground at an angle (near the north of the park) with what appears to be a stage in front of it. There is then a pond and some sprawling greenery on a natural incline. I thought - if they do theatre or gigs there that must be amazing but I cannae find nowt on interwebby about it...


What is it? Do performances and stuff happen there?


Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12452-crystal-palace-park-theatre/
Share on other sites

It's the former "concert bowl".


Back in the 70's it attracted large crowds and top acts...


http://www.ukrockfestivals.com/Garden-party-71.html


The horrible rusting steel eyesore (award winning!) replaced the original stage.


Since then there have been a few events but AFAIR few have attended (the tickets were extortionate even for trribute bands).


http://www.urban75.org/festivals/crystal-palace-bowl.html


The banked area has been packed with sun-worshipers with the recent hot weather.

A few weeks ago the stage was being jetwashed so perhaps something's planned.

The handover of CP Park to Bromley Council basically led to quite a few Park resources becoming under-utilised (some would say mis-managed) and to several areas of the Park falling into decline. Yes, there used to be a few events, expensive and poorly publicised. They weren't really trying.


The bowl layout is a bit of a mixed blessing. The water means that it's not so suitable for events where people need to be up close, and while the slope is ideal in dry conditions, it can become incredibly boggy quite quickly.


The report of the public inquiry into the future of the CP Park came out last week after much delay (the inspector was ill). I haven't had time to read it all yet (very long), but I understand that the inspector supports the sale of some Park land for housing, in order to pay a (minor) contribution towards Park improvements.

Bruce & Santana played in the athletics stadium.The classical concert were free,as were the pop gigs.That all stopped,when Bromley took over,then in 2008 there was a series of classical/popular concerts,last year nothing,but theyare repairing it,so hopefully the concerts will be returning.I'll make some enquiries & get back to you.

Btw the the original stage was temporary & the new one looks great in Autumn when its rusty exterior blends in with the trees.

The LDA held 3 years of talks with locals & local interest groups,then Ken lost & Boris suspended things,but last week it was agreed that ?87 million would be invested in the park,but not sure where the moneys'coming from.The land being used for new housing will be the camp/caravan site,which it is expected to move to the Olympic site.A precedent was set for the sale of land to fund the park when all the land was sold to build the current villas down Crystal Palace Park road around the 1880s.

garden man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The LDA held 3 years of talks with locals & local

> interest groups,then Ken lost & Boris suspended

> things,


An interesting interpretation.


The LDA made three planning applications concerning the park and its future, the so-called Masterplan. A public inquiry (the applications were called in by the Secretary of State) was held into these with hearings taking place in Crystal Palace up to September 2009. The inquiry inspector reported last week.


Given that the government is due to abolish regional development agencies (?)...


but last week it was agreed that ?87

> million would be invested in the park,


It was agreed by whom?

Last week, the inquiry inspector's report was published, and the inspector approved the three planning applications and set out a scheme which might guarantee a 'little' money for the scheme (probably less than 10% of scheme cost, maybe a lot less) from sale of land for housing on two sites in the PArk. The secretary of state scrubbed out the 'guarantee' (from any developer) which his department felt would be akin to a 'tax'. That matter was dealt with in his 30-odd page letter (not in the main report). So, as is, the scheme has no guaranteed funding. It seems unlikely that public funds will be found in the current climate.


but not sure

> where the moneys'coming from.The land being used

> for new housing will be the camp/caravan

> site,


A number of sites in and next to the Park are planned to have new building. These include Capel Manor new college building (on the green on the Anerley Hill side), housing development at Rockhills (north-west corner) and housing development at Sydenham Gate (northern side). Both the latter are inside the Park, while the first is on the edge of the Park but outside the Park boundary.


The camping site would become Metropolitan Open Land (see for example paragraph 24 of the secretary of state's letter) and so - eventually - add to the total pot of MOL. And because the campsite removal would eventually result in increased total of MOL, there are Very Special Circumstance to justify sale of some MOL for housing, sez the Inspector.


which it is expected to move to the Olympic

> site.


The campsite has a lease until 2018 or 2019 and has the legal right to stay until then. AFAIK, there is no site or location for it to move to (though some attempt to track one down was made at some point).


A precedent was set for the sale of land to

> fund the park when all the land was sold to build

> the current villas down Crystal Palace Park road

> around the 1880s.


The decision to sell some land was based on current English planning law and planning policy guidelines concerning the possible uses of Metropolitan Open Land (a class of land which didn't exist in the 1880s). (Some have argued that this present case might set a precedent for other MOL elsewhere, though).


Did we read the same report?

> The decision to sell some land was based on current English planning law and planning policy guidelines concerning the possible uses of Metropolitan Open Land (a class of land which didn't exist in the 1880s). (Some have argued that this present case might set a precedent for other MOL elsewhere, though).


That means Goose Green, Peckham Rye Common and Piermont Green are not safe.


John K

No, that was also the athletics stadium. My mistake.


I've seen a few classical concerts there.


Crystal Palace Park as a whole is a bit depressing. It is a beautiful park, with a wonderful sense of history, but there is something very grubby about it.


That's what comes of a tory council controlling it I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...