Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I watched a documentary called 'The Cove' last night. It was heartbreaking, about the Japanese culling of dolphins in just one cove. The most alarming point the film made was that if nothing major is done to curb fishing overall (so that stocks can regenerate), there'll be nothing left to fish within 40 years. Billions of years of evolution will be gone.


It seems part of the problem for dolphins is that although they are technically part of the porpoise family which is a sub species of whale, the IWC (international whaling commission) doesn't recognise that, so the Japanese since the ban on whaling switched to dolphin instead, killing 23,000 in this one cove every year alone. And the Japanses are also now paying smaller countries to join the IWC and lobby with them for the abolition of the ban on whaling (effectively a bribe) too.


The thing that really needs culling it seems, is humans. There's just too many of us and mostly we are wasteful. The planet can not keep up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12367-the-cove-and-fishing/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...and mostly we

> are wasteful.


...and greedy, and have little regard for depleting natural resources and for the environment for future generations.


I saw that film at the Ritzy last year (or was it this year?)...the various shots of the scarlet blood-stained beach were quite stomach churning.




Edits due to sleep deprivation:-S

I tend to think that surely it would be possible to farm enough fish whilst the oceans recover. The Japanese though have a diet extremely high in fish - but I can't understand why whale or dolphin are so neceassry as part of that diet given all the varieties of fish out there.


One point the documentary did make was that the biggest lure of dolphin fishing is for the provision of dolphins to sea life centres...so that seems to be the main reason for fishing them.....killing the rest for food is just a sideline. So next time anyone goes to see a dolphin show - think about how many dolpins ended up as food so that you could watch that one dolphin do tricks.....it's thousands.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I tend to think that surely it would be possible

> to farm enough fish whilst the oceans recover.



But farming fish creates its own set of problems for the environment.


There is a great deal of waste in fishing...e.g. where fishermen aim to catch one type of fish but end up catching a host of other (good) stuff only to then throw the unwanted catch (now dead) back into the sea.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

The slaughter of Cetaceans is regrettable but in the marine big scheme of things, pretty much an irrelevance.The impact of their total removal would be emotional, but would have negligible effect on the Biomass of the areas they inhabit


The Japanese still hunt for political reasons - the prefectures that have the whaling fleets carry a big clout & no one will push through a decision that will impact on them. We can't really bleat about this though - We have the same situation in the UK, especially around the Scots' ports, despite overwhelming evidence to suggest we are likely past the tipping point for white fish.


The Japanese have warehouses full of whale meat that no one, 'cept the oldies, eat any more. Cods aren't cuddly or have cartoons made about them, but have a far greater importance to marine health than the whales do. Incidentaly, the West was responsible for the decimation of the whale population if the first instance, so we ought not to point fingers.


The Japanese - arguably correct to a degree - think that their hunting activities are singled out because of cultural differences with the liberal West. Maybe not racism, but the lazy demonisation and belittling of an entire people isn't usually a good start to getting things sorted out.- and this isn't too far from the current opinion of many


Whilst every middle class gap year Brit would sell his sole to get a few months on the Sea Shepherd to pad out his moribund CV, it is a diversion. Whilst smug Guardian readers support the likes of the Sea Shepherds, much the movement stinks of hypocracy, pomposity and self aggrandisement.


Whilst we worry about the slaughter of a few whales - and make no mistake they are not in any imminent danger of extinction - The European fleets vacuum these waters of every living thing they can find. Wider afield, industrial fleets pay a few bribes and strip the inshore waters of Africa in a similar fashion. This is the real issue but doesn't have a USP that Disney can harness to its profit, so goes unnoticed.


We all know about the Grand Banks Cod extermination but we forget that there used to be a Tuna season off Yorkshire until relatively recently. When was the last time you were offered a British caught Tuna ?


Vewing an emotional doc about Cetacean slaught isn't pleasant, but it's lazy and emotive. Have a look at "The end of the line" if you want to be truly appalled. In fact you can probabaly rent it at the soon to be no more Rental shop on LL. whilst on the way to Moxons for your Swordfish steaks with your weekend Guardian tucked under your arm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would have thought Oru/ Trinco would be noisy… certainly is at mid afternoon. Do let us know when you have been what is was like and where you finally settled on.sure we are all interested  as your requirements are quite specific and good to know or have reviews on places, especially from you with different needs and requirements. Actually, given the numbers involved and as you say a special occasion, assuming £20/30  head, you really should have a chat with Suzanne. Maybe your kids could chip in a bit more as they are working.. You could always provide a cake yourself for after. Her food is special and well cooked.. know what you are getting..!    Italian place is also good as well and would cater for your needs except of  course the toilet aspect which is a steep climb down stairs… even I struggle. Yes, , know you are not a fan of Vietnamese place after tea incident… Owner now does all the cooking and so nice and accommodating but you won’t go there.. Wish she got more support… had a bereavement recently…       
    • Depends on your definition of idiot.  I use the term to describe someone of low intellectual capacity.  But understand that this is now not used as seen to be offensive. In that respect he makes decisions that are good for him, and his close followers.  Whether they are in the interests of the US that is open to debate (in the same way that history will debate all major leaders eg was Thatcher/Reagan good for the UK/US). On line definitions: An idiot is most commonly a term for a stupid, foolish, or senseless person, often used as an insult or to express frustration with someone's silly behavior, but historically it was a clinical term for profound intellectual disability, which is now considered offensive and obsolete. The word comes from Greek roots meaning a "private person" or layman, evolving to signify ignorance and lack of skill before becoming a derogatory label for low mental capacity.  Modern Usage Self-deprecation: Used to describe one's own silly mistakes ("I felt like an idiot when I tripped").  Insult/Exclamation: A very foolish person or someone acting stupidly ("Don't be such an idiot!").  Historical/Obsolete Meaning Medical Classification: Once a technical term for someone with extreme intellectual disability (IQ below 25), a usage now rejected as offensive.  Origin Greek (idiōtēs😞 A private citizen, layman, or someone lacking professional knowledge. Latin (idiota😞 An uneducated or ignorant person.  The notable recent  'idiot' was Johnson who of course played the fool (lovable rogue) but that served him well So ultimately not a good word as it can be used in many ways. Ignorant is another good example - can be stupid, unaware, or simply rude.
    • Are you still needing this?
    • I couldn’t disagree more - Trump is an idiot and he was voted for by a combination of idiots, racists and arrogance  you can complain about weak opponents all you like - but when the alternative is a “strong” thug then the problem is those who favour the thug.  All we face was predicted  - and he doesn’t have widespread support across many parts of America. So that leaves parts of America responsible for this  oh and in the list of things you call him you forgot the bit about being a p(that’s enough! Ed)  Vance might be worse in many ways - but he doesn’t have the “glam” that Trump has. Once Trump is exposed properly or dies, nowhere near as many people will vote for his successor see also his embarrassing fanboy: Farage 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...