Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MP3 files are convenient but sound like shit, losing up to 25% on compression. So after agonising long enough I've just invested in a pair of these beauties after reading THIS amongst other reviews and trying a few out.


I'm not disappointed - these are really very good indeed IMO for the price and will change the way you use your ipod/MP3. You'll listen to it waaaaay much more. I'd almost say its like listening to music in 3D. Or having a religious experience. Especially if you can pick out the the wire brush drumming on that Miles Davis track that didn't otherwise didn't exist. Also great on an 8 hr flight - beautifully cancelling out the mid flight duty free announcement and both engines of a 757.


Still waiting for the next generation quality MP3 format - but these are a decent start.



Caution: Do NOT wear on the late 12 bus back home. You will be mugged.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12361-ipodmp3-magic-on-the-move/
Share on other sites

Sorry but how can a pair of headphones magically replace the detail lost through compression?

Once it's lost it's gone!


I'm not denying that these may be very good headphones, and I'm in the market for anew pair of 'buds and will definitely check these ones out, but these aren't going to miraculously make everything sound exactly like how the master track would have done, compression is compression, once the details gone it's gone.


Thanks for the heads up on the 'phones though.

I'm liking your 'phones vibes there Steve. I like to call 'em buds


You're right - they can't replace compression but they can still bring out detail that your standard stock issues don't and underpin it all with a bass that will sing to your soul. And with background noise cancelling to boot.


As Jimmy Iovine says - "You can make bad coffee warm, but its still bad coffee" but these make a huge difference. He likens playing through stock earphones /speakders to playing a Beatles master through a portable tv. Try them out and see for yourself?


I've got the in ear version which retails at 125 squids with phone mic or 92 without. It comes with 10 pairs of different ear bud adaptors for weird shaped ears.

Get a load of the pretentious arsehole in that article, ?The people we work with spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year getting the sound exactly right.?


Why bother?


It?s the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on marketing telling the vacuous masses what to enjoy that determines what they?re going to buy. It could just as easily be the crazy frog song as the messa da requiem. Sound quality doesn?t matter. They?d buy a recording of Sheryl Cole farting into a can if they were told to. The money spent on production is just knob grease to make those involved feel like artistes and placate them into compliance.



Ps. Fight the power etc?

And another thing?


Wotthefukis the obsession with bass? It came out of the club scene where pilled up bellends needed the physical stimulus to get their serotonin going and from rap and R&B where they needed a good background thump to drown out how utterly crap and substance-less the rest of it was. Now it?s seems to be the overriding factor no matter what you?re listening to. Bollocks, crap and nonsense.

Fair enough B but I still need some new headphones because mine are held together with superglue so what to buy?


One plus for Bosse is that they don't leak. I find it really annoying when I'm on the bus and someone has leaky headphones so I try to ensure that mine don't.

Anyway I?m looking for new in-ear ones too. Can?t be bothered with the big helicopter pilot ones.* Thing is I?ve tried expensive ones and cheap ones and they both sound the same and both broke after about the same amount of time.


Either way neither of them were any fuken good at revealing the subtle production wizardry underpinning tracks like, Murder the Government and I Hate Led Zeppelin.



*Especially as I don?t have the Clapham standard issue aviators to go with them.



Edit because it's subtle not sublet.

So am I OK to replace my falling-to-bits Boses with some new shinny ones then? I'm not remotely gizmo-minded so a yes or no will suffice. I only replace gizmos when they fall to bits, and that would be now. I don't replace them just because a new model comes along; I save my money for more important purchases (shoes).


And Brendan "I hate Led Zeppelin". Well that's just wrong. Also, I?m sure that each and every one of Cheryl Tweedy?s farts has been declared a national treasure and Heat Magazine has a photo-spread lined up. I've absolutely no idea who Murder the Government are but it sounds like an excellent idea so definitely with you on the fukoff call. The ?3.50 is yours when you want it though.


Px

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...