Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it depends on your gap sizes, the colour of your floor, what you want it to look like - and the level of effort and cost you're interested in.


In the end - for ours - I used some stuff which I think is called 'draughtex' now, which is a big roll of squashy dark grey rubber tubing that you stretch out and push in with a supplied applicator tool. It's easy to use, no glue/mess, looks good (with our colour floorboards anyway, you don't really see it), isn't permanent in case you change your mind later - and most importantly, hasn't fallen out yet.


If there's a lot of variation in your 'gaps' you might need a couple of different width tubes. If the gaps are really big, over a certain width, it won't work.


They used to let you order a few free samples to try it out first..

The guys who sanded our floors used the sawdust-and-resin method. We weren't expecting it to last a lifetime, but it all started dropping out within a couple of months (maybe OK for very small gaps though). We should have probably found someone able to do the thin-strips-of-wood thing instead.


Have filled in some gaps myself with brown decorator's caulk which seems to work OK, but is a bit of a messy job.

Strips of wood / splicing is the top-end solution - but it's only as good as the person who does it and can take a long time and cost wedge. If you've got lots of variation in gaps it's a bit of an art to get it looking good.


I started out with a bag of sawdust and a tin of clear sticky stuff and did a few experiments first - decided pretty quickly it would succumb to gravity in lots of places. And it was a real arse.


I should say the purpose of the draughtex is to.. er.. seal the gaps and stop draughts, not to fill the gaps for a visual effect for a flat, gapless floor - it can't do that!

Yeah that would probably work better.


tbh I didn't really like the way the sawdust thing looked anyway.. it looked a bit like fluff, dirt and 'stuff' had just fallen into the cracks and built-up.


I prefer the gaps between the boards look - just not the icy blasts that rush up from them during winter.


I was only doing sporadic areas though, not a whole room.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The guys who sanded our floors used the

> sawdust-and-resin method. We weren't expecting it

> to last a lifetime, but it all started dropping

> out within a couple of months (maybe OK for very

> small gaps though). We should have probably found

> someone able to do the thin-strips-of-wood thing

> instead.


This is because the timber floorboards will expand and contract with temp/moisture changes. The floorboards need a gap to expand into...

Where is the foor and do you need to fill the gaps in? As it will be a floating floor no doubt houses breath in part through the floor.


Will there be any sort of covering?


If you do need to fill the gaps, thin slithers of wood as has been already suggested. Anything else will just be messy.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is because the timber floorboards will expand

> and contract with temp/moisture changes. The

> floorboards need a gap to expand into...


Not 100% convinced, people manage to have fitted hardwood floors without the need for gaps for expansion.

All the flooring companies recommend that you leave a gap at the edges to allow for expansion, and that's with flooring products that have been manufactured to minimise it.


We used the sawdust & glue method - ok for a while, but over time it becomes more brittle and with expansion it pulls away from one side, eventually cracks and falls out. You can get silicone products in 'wood' colours that supposedly get over the problem, but not tried them.

That's right DaveR. If you want the close boarded look, the best solution is a perimeter expansion gap under the skirting so it's not seen, i.e. the skirting board sits slightly above the floor boards. The gap can be filled with a flexible mastic to prevent draughts in either clear or a colour to match the floor boards. Personally I'd leave the gap if it's a period property as the building needs to 'breathe' a little...

I found that boarded, judo mat style thick underlay and a good wool carpet did the trick.


Bloody lovely it is now too, but stopped about a 30cm short of the and hearth and fitted a wood edge along that length. It shows the painted boards from there on (a bit like a giant fitted rug)

In keeping with what the Victorians did...


Flooring: Do try to be authentic. Carpets should be heavily patterned in dark green, red or pink and white, with large three-dimensional designs incorporating flower, animals and sometimes geometric motifs. Most Victorian houses had some carpets, but there was usually a two-foot wide margin around the perimeter, with the floorboards quite often stained or stenciled with geometric or floral designs.

I used plastic strips which come in two colours. Can't remember what they're called but I'll see if I can find it.


Really easy to fit, they're a V shape and expand to fill the gap, look natural (I used dark brown between white painted floorboards and they just look like gaps) and stop draughts.


There is another thread on the subject on here somewhere, and I gave the name on there. I'll see if I can find it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Bit nerdy. But the traditional form of England/Wales local government was based on committees with themehmbers in proportion to the respective political parties numbers.  Blair government introduced for councils that chose it cabinet structure where the majority hold roles covering each of  former committee would decide/confirm. Additionally a Blair option for a super council leader Mayoral role such as Lewisham rather than ceremonial mayoral role who chairs council Council Assemblies of all councils. A number of councils have since moved from exec Mayoral role to cabinet basis.  Without Councillors being elected via a Proportional Voting system I personally would prefer to see a return to committee decision making structure. It ensures all Councillors have to know what they're doing rather than the ruling party leaving it to a few cabinet members and the rest just voting at Council Assemblies how they/re told. Just a personal view. 
    • With the elections coming up soon, it's interesting to note that residents over the boundary in Lewisham have a different system of local government than Southwark. Lewisham has a directly elected Executive Mayor while Southwark has kept a traditional local authority structure. Nothing is perfect, but I think Lewisham made a mistake with the Executive Mayor in that it blurs the legislative branch and executive branch of governance, and makes serious scrutiny of decisions less likely to happen - especially in a Borough like Lewisham which is essentially a one-party state. None of the political parties are offering any major reforms of local government for London, which is very disappointing since it seems obvious that having 33 local authorities - all with their own internal administrations - is not a good way to run things, when most of them are struggling even to maintain basic services.
    • My  understanding is that all developments whatever size, have to have an element of social housing…affordable housing… council housing..No longer sure of percentage but clearly less than years ago.. The point is house builders clearly make a profit or they simply would not  continue building what I refer to as modern  boxes!  Putting housing condensed or what originally was one house with land attached.  Huge development going on in Beckenham - 200 social housing and rest open market.. sited over several houses now demolished… up the road from the park on way into town centre.. might even be completed by now.. haven’t been that way in last year… certainly can’t miss it.. So, for example, let’s say a developer builds houses and flats on a site… social housing I assume would be in a separate block to other flats and I assume house as well. Ie to put it bluntly, away from main site.. Nothing wrong in that at all.  Many years ago, near Borough a developer built flats divided into blocks. . Price range £300/400,000. Social housing was in a different block…. Can’t remember how many… so families , couples etc got a brand new flat with modern kitchen and bathrooms, flooring etc  and could not even keep common parts clean.. trash thrown out and left including out of windows etc..total disregard for community and certainly not  grateful for brand new property and a home.. I hasten to add, not every flat in the social housing sector but certainly a fair few behaved that way.      
    • Please name all of the shops.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...