Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was that the one slagging off his next door neighbour and giving the address?!


His other posts seemed quite normal. He must have been very very very drunk :))


Or it could have been a her I guess. Certainly his neighbour was (keep your snotty legs together was part of it, if memory serves :))


And "posh t*at" )

Only ever gonnae be one winner there #AdminsABoss


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This seems unlikely to end well:

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,1848218

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This seems unlikely to end well:

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1848218


And it's gone as well now. Admin obviously decided enough was enough on that one.

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9

> ,1848085


Oh dear. Surely everyone knows by now that on this forum you mention cyclists vs drivers, make a first post complimenting a new business / dissing an existing one or advertise cats entirely at your own risk?


[Edited to correct effing autocorrect]

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > And it's gone as well now. Admin obviously

> decided enough was enough on that one.

>

> Still visible, fwiw, at

> http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cac

> he%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Ffor

> um%2Fread.php%3F5%2C1848218&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%

> 2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fread.php%3F

> 5%2C1848218&



Sadly that is only a tiny part of the thread, ianr :)

  • 4 weeks later...

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Filed under "Watching brief"

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,1856347


Do the police actually come for reports of noise/ loud party in Southwark?


I'm just over the border in Lewisham now. Our "noise team" only works 9am-5pm (or thereabouts), and police will not typically attend to sound complaints unless there is a threat of violence.


Just curious. xx

I love the recommendations for Fernando Pinto. All legitimate for sure. I just read them as if they are written in code used by the bored housewives of ED who engage his services...



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And he's offering "favours" for continued use.

>

>

  • 2 weeks later...

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the recommendations for Fernando Pinto. All

> legitimate for sure. I just read them as if they

> are written in code used by the bored housewives

> of ED who engage his services...



Yeah. Agreed. I love these. "Fernando came over and trimmed my bush today leaving me with a real feeling of space and light. He's great with his hands and leaves no mess behind him". "He always has the best tool for the job" etc etc.


Disclaimer: I'm sure Fernando really is a great guy and a good gardener.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...