Jump to content

Heads up - Interesting threads in the main section

Keef

By Keef
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted
Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to express an objective view without someone implying they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple of times before, I did use the forum before for a time, then had a long break and had to set up a new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that meets with the Inquisition's approval!
red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to

> express an objective view without someone implying

> they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple

> of times before, I did use the forum before for a

> time, then had a long break and had to set up a

> new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that

> meets with the Inquisition's approval!


Guilty? Inquisition? Hardly, it was a straightforward question which I wouldn't have asked had you not made reference to it in your previous post. Methinks the lady doth protest too much ;-)...

Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted

How tedious this is.


I was talking about someone else, not me. By juxtaposing your question with that, ending with an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that or were just stirring. If your intention was to be taken at face value, however, you could have explained your though process and not used the ellipse.


Go and needle someone else. Not interested.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How tedious this is.

>

> I was talking about someone else, not me. By

> juxtaposing your question with that, ending with

> an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also

> Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that

> or were just stirring. If your intention was to be

> taken at face value, however, you could have

> explained your though process and not used the

> ellipse.

>

> Go and needle someone else. Not interested.


Judging by your last but one sentence, you clearly thought the latter.

Once again you come across as overly defensive, only this time with added neurosis, alluding that I was now somehow implying that you're Blah Blah. Go to the previous page and you will see an image I posted that is a visual clue as to who I think Blah Blah is. Here's a clue: It's not you...

aquarius moon

aquarius moon

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you by any chance smoke weed?



Unfortunately my weed smoking days are over & I've always found the effect of alcohol to be far nicer.


And before you ask.....I'm not drunk either.


RD is right. I wasn't even talking about you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Decision 2 April - Proposed Development - The Sidings, Railway Rise, SE22

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      The private sector is not going to build a significant amount of social housing. Everyone is very keen for *everyone else* to subsidise construction of social housing. I take it none of the objectors to this scheme was suggesting putting up council tax so Southwark could build more social housing...? Social housing isn't going to appear in serious numbers if the state doesn't borrow money and build it.
    • Michelle.
      Tesla at Belair House

      By Michelle. · Posted

      They must be really desperate to collab with Tesla. Honestly, it's not even the worst thing they've done. I've noticed these sex events happening in the last few months at a place that's supposed to be a restaurant and venue. I was planning my wedding there and was appalled by the setup for those events. When I discovered what was going on, I was disgusted by how they were using the same rooms as 'playrooms' where families are supposed to eat. The hygiene and safety concerns are just unacceptable. We really need to come together as a community to put a stop to this! They're destroying a sacred, Grade II listed building, and it's just not right. The owners need to be held accountable for their actions. It's time for us to stand up and protect our heritage and ensure that these spaces are used appropriately, especially when they should be serving families and the community.   sex events vid.mp4 sex events videe.mp4 Literally promoting it on their Instagram! Only just taken down after scrutiny.     
    • trinidad
      Anyone experiencing even greater issues securing a GP appointment with Tessa Jowell GP practice?

      By trinidad · Posted

      yes, which properly explains why they responded to me on this occassion, as i included the CQC in my response. I have spoken to the Health Ombudsman, and they feel the regulator is more suited to the issues I have raise for more than a year now. welcome aboard. its great to have you on the thread. so sorry you are also experiencing issues. has this been addressed as yet?
    • tiddles
      Tesla at Belair House

      By tiddles · Posted

      Tbh most Tesla owners are people who are concerned about the environment and have purchased accordingly- but mr nut job has soured their purchasing- so I actually sympathise with them being associated with such an awful man. But to actively promote the company given the knowledge we now know about him makes utterly unacceptable. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...