Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I was looking to buy a flat in the area, one estate agent told me that these two blocks are known as 'the battleships' as when you look at them from a distance it looks like two ships facing each other with funnels pointing out from the tops of them. Quite a good comparison I thought.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, Keef, Malcolm. Very sad. It was an accident.

> I'll tell you about it on Friday at the drinks.


Yes very sad, and yes do!


I'll be sure to tell my old man as well, because I think he's always believed he jumped. They weren't exactly great mates, but think they played a bit of golf, or maybe just drunk in the same circle...

ClareC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are the Dawson Heights flats empty then? Does

> anybody know what is happening to the flats

> opposite Sainsbury's? I think they look really

> nice, just unkept.....


The Dog Kennel Hill estate... yes, the buildings are quite nice. There's supposed to be some sort of redevelopment project going on, but I have yet to see any concrete evidence of this.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's not forget that the East Dulwich Postcards

> showed the view from up there:

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/images/eas

> t-dulwich-postcards.jpg


Nor that these great cards are being distributed around East Dulwich by my son (only 150 to go Mark, last post tomorrow) to publicise EDF.

I've also heard about them resembling battleships - was also told that they won an architecural award when built - any truth in that? On the whole, despite certain brutalist tendency I like them - tho' better at night.


Don't know if anyone has watched the programme "The Tower" on BBC2 (I think). Old council tower block in Deptford with fabulous views across and up / down the Thames taken over by private company, tarted up and sold on to private leaseholders. Could this be the plan for Dawson Heights?

I'm amazed that no one has commented on how great the view over London is from the hillside just below the estate itself. I walk there often and hardly ever see anyone around, except the occasional dogwalker. Either people just don't know about it, or are put off by the thought of walking near an estate for some reason. In my opinion the views are better than those from Hampstead or Highgate by far - you have a panoramic view of the whole London skyline, stretching from Millinium Dome, Canary Wharf, the City, St Pauls, BT tower, Houses of Parliament to the Battersea Power Station, you name it. On a clear day you can even see the Wembley Arch and Harrow. And best of all, you don't have 1,000 tourists tossing frisbees over your head either....
  • Administrator

Parker's Folly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm amazed that no one has commented on how great

> the view over London is from the hillside just

> below the estate itself.


The East Dulwich Postcards showed the view from that exact point, as mentioned earlier

Parker's Folly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm amazed that no one has commented on how great

> the view over London is from the hillside just

> below the estate itself.


The East Dulwich Postcards showed the view from that exact point, as mentioned earlier :)

I was told by someone who lives close to the estate that it's suffering from subsidence problems (something to do with them being built on the spoils of the second Blackwall tunnel) and the council can't sell them until they've sorted the problem. Could be nonsense though.

Candy & Candy bidding for Dawson Heights, now that has to be a wind up, I can see their portfolio strap line now, 'Mayfair, Chelsea, Monaco, Dulwich'.

The Candy brothers are responsible for the super luxury development of Richard Rogers One Hyde Park on the old site of Bowater House (IMHO a far nicer building).

If you believe the hype, once it's built the flats will cost between ?4m and ?80m EACH, next doors Mandarin Oriental Hotel will provide a concierge service.

The brothers are also doing the same at the old Chelsea Barracks, which they paid ?900m for, oh and they already hold the ?27m record for selling a single London flat.

Now I now prices are getting steep round these parts, but really.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It fails to mention the dirty great flat blocks

> bang in the middle of it.


That's a lovelt map. To be fair, it does say "Ladlands flats Dawson's Heights Estate" where the flats would be, but to actually draw them would have people complaining that it ruined the view ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...