Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oops! Sorry, didn't realise it was a "Football" film.


I've never really rated Upson and him being an ex-Gooner you can keep him but Green's a pretty good goalkeeper. As it happens I thought Gomes had his best game in a Spurs shirt against West Ham the other night especially when he pulled off two brilliant point blank saves towards the end and we went up the other end and scored our second.

Bagpuss is after Glen Johnson now according to our darling media. So that is David James, Glen Johnson, Sylvan Distin, Kranjcar, Diarra, Belhadj, Peter Crouch and Jermaine Defoe he is buying!


I guess imitation is the best form of flattery. Spurs will be moving to the South Coast and winning major trophies soon! :)

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bagpuss is after Glen Johnson now according to our

> darling media. So that is David James, Glen

> Johnson, Sylvan Distin, Kranjcar, Diarra, Belhadj,

> Peter Crouch and Jermaine Defoe he is buying!

>

> I guess imitation is the best form of flattery.

> Spurs will be moving to the South Coast and

> winning major trophies soon! :)



It's just press speculation ratty but I'd like Defoe back and I think it's possible we might nick Johnson off you. He's certainly a better player since his time at West Ham and Chelsea.

Jah is Spurs, but no, Sandperson is Man U, LadyGooner (oviously), Sean, and others are Arsenal, Ratty is Pompey, Mockney, ???? and Rhinestone are all Hammers, and myself and Annasfield are Liverpool.


By the way ratty, "Spurs couldn't afford Tottenham"? I had to read that about 4 times just to make sure ;-)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You will, she's never ever predicted a loss for

> Arsenal I don't think ;-)

>

> Lovely lass though despite her misled choice in

> team.


And have you ever predicted a loss for Liverpool Keef?!


Thanks for calling me a lovely lass - Kells may be misled into thinking I am 21 - again!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah is Spurs, but no, Sandperson is Man U,

> LadyGooner (oviously), Sean, and others are

> Arsenal, Ratty is Pompey, Mockney, ???? and

> Rhinestone are all Hammers, and myself and

> Annasfield are Liverpool.>

> By the way ratty, "Spurs couldn't afford

> Tottenham"? I had to read that about 4 times just

> to make sure ;-)


Ahem! Er and little me.

...and there are those of us who eschew the spurious glamour of Premiership clubs (sour grapes? moi??!!) and soldier on with our lifelong enslavement to the Giants of the Championship...or even the Football League, although alas the numbers in the latter category were recently reduced by one when one chap apostacised and gave it all up for the dubious pleasures of the Oval Ball....


B)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...