Jump to content

Let's rewrite the rules of football........Proposal # 2


Recommended Posts

Its not just girls - most MOTD pundits don't understand it either.



But if it was done away with, would the game change much - its not as if many teams can afford to have lots of players sitting up front waiting for the ball.


There is no offside in 5 aside and it does not result in half the team goal hanging.

I understand the off side rule lol and did you know that the real reason that the FA banned womens league football in 1921 was because it was drawing bigger gate receipts than the men's game.


I watched one of the Irish footy games in the Park today and they seem to have no offside rule (although what a strange game it is...not football at all) and there were a million goals (well ok not a million but you get the point) because two players were always goal side of their defender to receive the ball.


So no, the offside rule works and should stay!


(Although I did try explaining it to ladymuck at the footy kickabout and for her sake maybe it should be abolished!)

The offside rule is easy - just think of it in these terms:


You're in a shoe shop, second in the queue for the till. Behind the shop assistant on the till is a pair of shoes which you have seen and which you must have.


The 'opposing' shopper in front of you has seen them also and she is eyeing them with desire.


Both of you have forgotten your purses.


It would be totally rude to push in front of the first woman if you had no money to pay for the shoes.


The shop assistant remains at the till waiting.


Your friend is trying on another pair of shoes at the back of the shop and sees your dilemma.


She prepares to throw her purse to you.


If she does so, you can catch the purse, then walk round the other shopper and buy the shoes.


At a pinch she could throw the purse ahead of the other shopper and, *whilst it is in flight* you could nip around the other shopper, catch the purse and buy the shoes.


Always remembering that until the purse had *actually been thrown* it would be plain wrong to be forward of the other shopper.


There, much clearer!*



*stolen from "Home is where the marmite is"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's a difficult site to make work - being located quite far from the other pubs and eateries of Lordship Lane. I really hope they will be successful. Will be a welcome addition.
    • Due to unforeseeable  circumstances, we are unable to host the Forum Drinks for (probably) the next few months. If anyone else would like to take over on a temporary basis, book the space etc, please PM me on here!
    • May  I  suggest you read your posts through before you post them? I'm sorry your attempts at teaching blinds to see have failed. Perhaps it is because they are inanimate objects? And have no eyes? 🤣 May I also suggest that you find a different source of information - one  which presents you with accurate facts? But if you seriously think that Trump is "best us president of last 50 years" (your lower case, not mine) then sadly there is probably little anybody can do to help you.
    • There are many reasons that properties both private and council are empty and these numbers do not signify that they could be moved into tomorrow to reduce homeless numbers. For example, in my terrace of 10 houses, one house is going through probate and another is going through a large scale renovation. 20% non ocupancy seems high until you examine the reasons why. Both will be providing homes in due course, sooner rather than later.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...