Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some useful, hopefully objective, background on this whole debacle http://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/uk-government-under-pressure-to-set-out-brexit-vision/


Sounds like confusion reigned in the debate yesterday with TM rejecting points based immigration and DD needing to be corrected.

Local MP Helen Hayes (Dulwich & West Norwood) spoke in Monday's debate on the petition for a second referendum. Sensibly, she is in favour:


"Yesterday, the Prime Minister confirmed that there is no commitment to give additional funds to the NHS as a consequence of Brexit?a pledge that toured the country on the side of a bus, and on the basis of which millions of people voted in good faith to leave the EU. The Prime Minister says that Brexit means Brexit, but when such pledges are broken almost immediately, none of us really knows what Brexit will mean. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that that lack of clarity further underlines the case for enabling the British people to see the detail of the actual Brexit deal and vote again on whether they would like to proceed on those specific terms, and that that should take place before article 50 is triggered?"


Full Hansard is at https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2016-09-05/debates/1609058000001/EUReferendumRules

I like Helen's comment. Also glad to hear Tim Farron finally making this same point clearly. But there's no real strong, cohesive opposition voice on this. It's disgraceful. This is one of the biggest peacetime challenges of the last 100 years for goodness sake. TM is doing a good job of holding a clear, united government line - but they have no proper sense of direction, and whatever David Davis says to the contrary, the whole process DOES look like a desperate attempt to make the best of a very bad job. I feel very let down by the whole lot of them.
The SNP are doing a reasonable job on holding the govt the some sort of account on this but they are really the actual opposition nowadays. Meanwhile hapless, useless, dogmatic Jeremy is stillgoing to win the Labour leadership contest, which will mean no effective opposition from Labour this side of a GE.
Not a mention of the EU or G7 from Corbyn at PMQs today. What planet is he on? Even on the topic of housing, he failed to mention the upcoming homelessness resolution debate. He seems to deliberately sidestep anything that is topical and it is just far too easy for May. And Labour look likely to be stuck with him.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a mention of the EU or G7 from Corbyn at PMQs

> today. What planet is he on? Even on the topic of

> housing, he failed to mention the upcoming

> homelessness resolution debate. He seems to

> deliberately sidestep anything that is topical and

> it is just far too easy for May. And Labour look

> likely to be stuck with him.


It seems to have been a childish reaction to Owen Smith's open letter saying what he should raise today, deliberately refusing to do so. I had great hopes of Corbyn, sick of him now - under that mild-mannered exterior there lurks an ego the size of Bournemouth. But as you say, looks like we're stuck with him now.

I do hope that a new opposition party will emerge after Corbyn's apparently inevitable re-election as leader of the current Labour Party. But that depends on politicians with vision and courage taking an initiative. If the current political landscape is anything to go by, one can't count on it. If we do have a GE any time soon could the SNP become the official, as well as the de facto, opposition?
The problem is that Corbyn seems to have cast some magical spell on people who don't think polling, or election results or performance at PMQs matters. Who knows how they think Labour will win the next election. That's what irritates me most. The naval gazing and ignorant blind faith, and there's no reasoning with them. Like you Rendel, I had great hope for Corbyn, and voted for him. But I also didn't know very much about him and can now see what a disaster he is for the party. But as you say, his ego is massive, and he is living in the past.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The problem is that Corbyn seems to have cast some

> magical spell on people who don't think polling,

> or election results or performance at PMQs

> matters. Who knows how they think Labour will win

> the next election. That's what irritates me most.

> The naval gazing and ignorant blind faith, and

> there's no reasoning with them. Like you Rendel, I

> had great hope for Corbyn, and voted for him. But

> I also didn't know very much about him and can now

> see what a disaster he is for the party. But as

> you say, his ego is massive, and he is living in

> the past.


Well if the media had given some respect to Ed Milliband

and Ed Balls maybe the ordinary members would think differently.


Whoever is Labour leader will be made a laughing stock by the press.


Edit: Did anyone notice how they treated Angela Eagle at that

press conference - that would have continued if she had become

leader.

I don't entirely agree JohnL. My heart sank the minute Ed Milliband won the leadership, rather than his brother. EM is clearly more impressive than Corbyn - but he never looked like great leadership material to me. I know we are none of us entirely uninfluenced by 'the media', but I would regard my opinion as having pre-dated any 'media judgement'.

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't entirely agree JohnL. My heart sank the

> minute Ed Milliband won the leadership, rather

> than his brother. EM is clearly more impressive

> than Corbyn - but he never looked like great

> leadership material to me. I know we are none of

> us entirely uninfluenced by 'the media', but I

> would regard my opinion as having pre-dated any

> 'media judgement'.


Maybe David would have been better - but I think he

is better appreciated in the US (He's going to be

working for Hillary ?).


Anyway this link shows how far his values are from

those who voted Brexit.


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/david-miliband-wants-to-close-the-worlds-refugee-camps_uk_57370134e4b0f0f53e36389e


Ed Balls was treated horribly I think - he is a very

clever man.

That's an interesting link. Clearly a more competent, coherent policy is needed to deal with refugees and I hope DM is in a position to help that happen. And you're right - he's made a good path for himself in the US. But in my view it's a great loss to us that he's neither our PM nor leader of the opposition.

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't entirely agree JohnL. My heart sank the

> minute Ed Milliband won the leadership, rather

> than his brother. EM is clearly more impressive

> than Corbyn - but he never looked like great

> leadership material to me. I know we are none of

> us entirely uninfluenced by 'the media', but I

> would regard my opinion as having pre-dated any

> 'media judgement'.



I have to agree here. I think Ed is actually quite left wing and would have made a very ineffective PM too (He lacked the courage of his left wing convictions too) no correlation between the two, but both reasons why I wouldn't have voted for Labour with him up top...but I guess in the Corby-cult vernacular I'm a Blairite and I certainly had had enough of Brown in 2010 and Balls was with him.


Re 'Media Judgement' Fundamentally the idea that everyone except the enlightened left are somehow 'puppets to the media' is and has always been a bit laughable. The amount of the enlightened left who seem enamored with utter tripe websites such as the Canary and far worse CT type sites of various dubious provenance is quite scary - I include Jezza in this, not just his acolytes.


Labour leaders get a rougher ride for sure but Corbyn is getting it in the neck from the media and his PLP (not just the Blairites) 'cos they see in the face just utterly how incompetent and unfit he is to lead the Labour Party and be a PM

It does now seem that May has been (to put it gently) over-promoted.


Quite a thing to put forward a policy on grammar schools that has the chief inspector of schools, the previous Tory education secretary, the chairperson of the house of commons education committee and the only paper on the right-wing with a reading age greater than eleven (the Financial Times editorial today, reading age approx. fourteen) crying out in derision.


Then there is the scrapping of Cameron's impending liberal justice-reforms, the fantasy of an iron curtain around the channel tunnel, the abolition of human rights in the new IP bill, and the vacuous mantra that 'brexit is brexit is brexit'.


There seems scant regard here for the manifesto on which the Tories were elected. And each new policy in turn reflects a Ruritanian (in the sense admirably described by Gellner in Nations and Nationalism: parochial, inward-looking, ahistorical, nationalistic, and narcissistic) mindset that one suspects (or at least hopes :-( ) few people would find attractive if tested by a general election.

She is going to have problems getting anything through the Lords that wasn't in the election manifesto. The Lords can only hold up a manifesto pledge for a year, but everything else, they can regect outright, if they wanted to. Backbenchers too, will never rebel against a manifesto pledge, but they may do so for anythng else and that majority is so slim. Worth bearing in mind too that we only know about these plans because of a sharp eyed photographer - otherwise we'd still be none the wiser. Party conference should be interesting!
  • 1 month later...

It's now reflections 16 or so weeks on, but interesting that despite all the: we are going to make it work, Brexit means Brexit, take control, new oppotunities rhetoric the official reports of Chancellor's Hammond's visit to the US were all damage limitation to total catastrophe. The government's narrative was not being followed. Sadly not sure if the media really picked this up.


Report that I saw was 180 degrees to ones such as this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/05/chancellor-philip-hammond-flies-to-new-york-to-reassure-nervous/


So hard Brexit - financial passporting is not guaranteed, multinationals will need to move some of their function out of the UK, the European banks are hovering like vultures, and there may be a tipping point where business moves lock stock and barrel out of London.


I am an ignoranus when it comes to financial markets, merely reporting expert views.


Yes I know this has now moved to the Ruritania thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...