Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef


I quite deliberately used the phrase "seems to suggest" in order to imply this was how I had interpreted the last sentence of your post. Clearly as this is just my interpretation it is open to correction. If you feel I have misrepresented your post, I apologise and by all means put me right, but please don't accuse me of "putting words in your mouth" when I haven't.

Fair enough, apologies.


With regards the crossing the road thing, I have to say, it's never crossed my mind. I've crossed the road (when I was younger) to avoid gangs, but never even thought to cross the road because I might be worrying someone else.


Perhaps now I will in the future, but again, it's a sad state that this should be necessary, and that women should feel so afraid when ou alone.


I've always gone for the keeping my distance, or the friendly smile approach.

It is indeed a sad state when a minority of social misfits can affect a society to the extent that it does.


Perhaps a rethink of how did it get to this position and should it be allowed to continue with the culture of soft


leniency in sentencing.


Perhaps flogging should be brought back for the benefit of the judiciary and ultimately society?


That serial rapist Reed who should have been stopped by the police several years ago, and whom are now being charged for their ludicrous handling of the case may improve things.

Unfortunately there are far more corrupt cops than the token dupes who have been knicked.

Sad for the straight and honest ones on the force who must find it difficult to watch what goes on at close quarters, and have to bite their tongues and ignore it for the sake of their careers.

He cycled by me in the park on his BMX this morning at about 10.45am, looked back at me and shook his head, he was wearing the same clothes, black trousers, grey hoody/jumper. By the time I got round to the old tennis courts the police were speaking to the boy, he was sitting on the tree trunk again. I gave them a positive ID on him but by the time the wardens had got over to him again he had vanished. They called 999 and had 4 cars and a van out looking for him on the streets but to no avail. They are hot on his heels and very keen to get him as they realise the potential danger that he could be and are patrolling the park daily.


Just to let you know that the police said if you see him, call 999 straight away as they are determined to get him and they are very aware of him.


I now feel really uneasy being in the park on my own now and think I'm going to walk my dog in Peckham park until he's caught. Such a shame that it's come to this but I am now fearing for my safety.

I think you'll find Peckham Rye an altogether more cheerful environment.


From a community point of view, the dog crowd in PR is close knit, so you are never far from someone who will stand by you.


It does have it's occasional yobs & hoodies, and I believe there has been a 'flasher' in the past (long time ago) but the general atmosphere of Peckham Rye is way more relaxed and less 'Yummie Mummie' than Dulwich Park, and dog areas are less restricted too.


Come to the Irish Festival this weekend & check it out!!

  • 3 months later...
My friend was in the park last week on the exercise machines. A black man stood in front of her and undid his top and then put his hand inside his trousers. She said he was probably in his late twenties. She could not find the warden but has asked me to post this to warn others.
Very terrifying. Do you mean Dulwich Park? Was anyone else around? Your friend should report it to the police. They take this very seriously thank goodness as it can escalate to something else. Hopefully your friend can give a description which could help find him.

Not sure about the hands in trousers thing - is it something trendy.


I had to access a building site recently and all the younger guys seem to walk around with there hands in their tracksuit bottoms. They also walk around 'on tiptoes' in a strange slovenly way that I never noticed before. The 'trouser' trends now are strange (for us that were young in the 80's).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...