Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On Monday I was walking my dog around the outside of Dulwich Park as I do every morning and I was approached by a young boy who firstly asked me the time then made some lewd comments while holding on to his genitals. Before this I noticed two undercover police looking for someone so put two and two together and approached them with my story. They were looking for him and ran after him, followed by a police car patrolling the park. I'm not sure if they got him as I saw him in the bushes again yesterday sitting on one of the tree stumps.


Please be aware of this boy as although young (maybe around 12-16) he came across very menacing and I did feel rather threatened and intimidated (being 5 months pregnant doesn't help either). He is about 5 foot, short dark hair, very pale skin and was wearing black school trousers and a grey pullover/hoodie type jumper.



Jilly xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11932-boy-in-the-park-beware/
Share on other sites

Poor you. Curious as to how you knew the cops were cops?


I feel sorry for the boy's parents when they find out what he has been doing. I have had more than my fair share of flashers since living in London. In cars (when called over by a man asking for directions), Bond Street tube station, and also while walking my dog.


I was in Dulwich Park today and left the outside track when I noticed a very large man lurking about near some trees. He gave me the creeps. Maybe he was harmless but didn't want to risk it.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cate he was probably having a pee.


No, he wasn't. At least not when I saw him and I watched him for about 2 minutes. I had been on the track, went off it to dispose of a poo bag and then wanted to rejoin the track and saw him lurking about.

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You stood and watched someone who gave you the

> creeps for 2 minutes???!!!



I wasn't close by ! Watched through the trees while with my dog and at least 25 feet away. There were other people near me on the road/pavement near exercise machines. He gave me the creeps because he seemed to be lurking and I wanted to see what he was doing. There are lots of female joggers and runners using that path at that time.

Wouldn't it be funny if he was telling his mates about this woman in the park who gave him the creeps by staring at him for 2 minutes or more....



cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> stevebailey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You stood and watched someone who gave you the

> > creeps for 2 minutes???!!!

>

>

> I wasn't close by ! Watched through the trees

> while with my dog and at least 25 feet away.

> There were other people near me on the

> road/pavement near exercise machines. He gave me

> the creeps because he seemed to be lurking and I

> wanted to see what he was doing. There are lots of

> female joggers and runners using that path at that

> time.

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> stevebailey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You stood and watched someone who gave you the

> > creeps for 2 minutes???!!!

>

>

> I wasn't close by ! Watched through the trees

> while with my dog and at least 25 feet away.

> There were other people near me on the

> road/pavement near exercise machines. He gave me

> the creeps because he seemed to be lurking and I

> wanted to see what he was doing. There are lots of

> female joggers and runners using that path at that

> time.


___________________________________________________________


Gotta be honest, I feel sorry for the guy who was 'lurking' and giving you the creeps by doing so, when you were 'lurking' behind some trees with your dog watching him for a good 2 minutes.

Seems as though you were doing exactly what he was!

Bloody lurkers!

I think I spotted this boy a few weeks back and was thinking of putting a post on here but didn't really have much to say, except I'd spotted him first walking around the lake - it was quite at the time, 9.30ish and I was with my little boy. It was really warm out but he had a hoody on, and kept looking back at me - i'm 7 months pregnant so it wasn't as if he was admiring my figure! Then I noticed him walking along the dog walking path, and he then stopped and was just hovering around. He just looked a bit odd and to be honest I did feel a bit uneasy.

If i spot him again will inform the wardens.

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > stevebailey Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > You stood and watched someone who gave you the

>

> > > creeps for 2 minutes???!!!

> >

> >

> > I wasn't close by ! Watched through the trees

> > while with my dog and at least 25 feet away.

> > There were other people near me on the

> > road/pavement near exercise machines. He gave me

>

> > the creeps because he seemed to be lurking and I

>

> > wanted to see what he was doing. There are lots

> of

> > female joggers and runners using that path at

> that

> > time.

>

> __________________________________________________

> _________

>

> Gotta be honest, I feel sorry for the guy who was

> 'lurking' and giving you the creeps by doing so,

> when you were 'lurking' behind some trees with

> your dog watching him for a good 2 minutes.

> Seems as though you were doing exactly what he

> was!

> Bloody lurkers!



Solitary men don't lurk on that part of the path. And I wasn't on the path at that point. I take it you are not a woman, Steve or is it Stephanie? therefore you wouldn't understand this and lots of other things. It's like men who walk behind a woman on the pavement, usually at night, not overtaking her and not crossing over to the other side of the road. It's frightening for a woman but I wouldn't expect you to understand that. You sound like a real plonker.

cate I think stevebailey is just having a bit of fun. To be fair, your "I watched through the trees" line did make me laugh, and leave you open to a bit of teasing.


It's an interesting point you make about men walking behind women. I do usually try to take over, or drop back if they walk fast, but then as I'm gaining, I think "do they think someone is coming up behind them to attack them?" It's difficult.


To be fair, I wouldn't cross the road, I don't think I should have to just because I am a bloke out at night.

I spent an interesting week recently at a resort where the wildlife were very human friendly.They are used to humans and thus act differently than if they were truly in the wild. They just come up to the villa door looking for food.If you leave it open the squirrels come in and help themselves. However there was a pecking order.Ducks and birds would chase off the squirrels. The only species the squirrel could bully were the cute rabbits. In the context of this thread what does this mean?

> Solitary men don't lurk on that part of the path.

> And I wasn't on the path at that point. I take it

> you are not a woman, Steve or is it Stephanie?

> therefore you wouldn't understand this and lots of

> other things. It's like men who walk behind a

> woman on the pavement, usually at night, not

> overtaking her and not crossing over to the other

> side of the road. It's frightening for a woman but

> I wouldn't expect you to understand that. You

> sound like a real plonker.


I can understand why you might find that frightening but if what you say is the case for a lot of women (ie. having a man walk on the same pavement as them at night causing fear of attack) then I think that is a real shame. I must honestly say that when walking behind someone of any gender at night time, I would not be thinking to myself that perhaps I should cross the road in case I'm making them worry I might jump them...I'm simply walking down the pavement.

It is sad but having been mugged from behind once... it does make me slightly nervous and I do feel better if the person behind either crosses over OR preferably, when I turn to glance behind, makes eye contact with a smile, nod or other acknowledgement.


While I know a mugger/rapist/axe murderer may be equally capable of making eye contact, I do feel safer since it shows that they're not worried about letting me see their face. And it feels a little more like a community/local friendliness action - just as you'd nod or say good morning in daylight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. 
    • @Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police.   They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No  qualifications are needed to become a PCSO.  At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes.      
    • Right.  Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed    Nothing ...  Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns.  Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “   ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had   But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems    as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it.  So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy.  But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response 
    • What would you have done differently, Rockets? I cannot, for the life of me, think of a financial strategy that would have satisfied 'working people' and businesses and driven growth and reduced the deficit. But I'm no economist. On another note, since we're bashing Labour, one thing that really got my goat was Labour's reaction to  Kemi Badenoch being elected leader of the opposition. When our own dear Ellie Reeves was asked for her reaction to KB's election, the first thing she said was "I'm proud that she's the first black woman to lead a political party, but..." Congratulating someone for being black (she's Nigerian FFS, not 'black') and female is such an insult. You'd be forgiven for thinking that that's all Labour sees... and it completely detracts from her achievements as a politician. It's almost as if they were implying that she'd done well in spite of her race and sex. If that's not racist... I think Kemi is an absolute nut job. People in her own party have said she'd start a brawl in an empty room and would cross the street to bite your ankle. But that kind of makes me like her. And if anyone can hold Labour's feet to the fire, she can.  (Ex labour party member here, who voted Keir for leader of the party, BTW, in case anyone wants to start a pile-on and call me a Tory lover). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...