Jump to content

Why are buses travelling more slowly? Blame Ocado....(and others).


Recommended Posts

The growth in the number of delivery vans and private hire vehicles together with the loss of road space to cycling have worked against the good effects of the congestion charge:

[www.theguardian.com]


If you don't want to read it, the boil of it is that congestion is rising, buses can't meet their revenues so the service is likely to diminish in terms of reliability and routes/timetables. Also, bus users are less likely to be "professionals" who know their ways around the system and are confident enough to complain.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the growth in the number of delivery vans and

> private hire vehicles together with the loss of

> road space to cycling have worked against the good

> effects of the congestion charge:

> [www.theguardian.com]

> 016/jun/06/london-cannot-afford-a-bus-service-slow

> down


Interesting reading, thanks. Have to take issue with the claims about cycle superhighways though, they refer to a reduction in capacity by 25% on "certain key routes" - well at present they're only on two routes representing 1% of total capacity, and furthermore there's no attempt to assess how many of the cyclists using them would otherwise be in cars or private hire vehicles.


Slightly suspicious also that the author of the quoted report, Prof.David Begg, is a non-executive director of FirstGroup, the UK's second largest bus company...which isn't mentioned anywhere...

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The growth in the number of delivery vans and

> private hire vehicles together with the loss of

> road space to cycling have worked against the good

> effects of the congestion charge:

>

>

> If you don't want to read it, the boil of it is

> that congestion is rising, buses can't meet their

> revenues so the service is likely to diminish in

> terms of reliability and routes/timetables. Also,

> bus users are less likely to be "professionals"

> who know their ways around the system and are

> confident enough to complain.


People don't 'complain' as such - they tweet and include

photos - I only see that increasing.

Surely one Ocado driver who leaves the depot and delivers to ten customers is going to cause less pollution than ten customers making individual return journeys to their local Waitrose branch. They might not all go by car I suppose...

Certainly less congestion with deliveries. Pollution... maybe.


As for minicabs - yep, Uber is cheap enough to be a viable alternative to public transport, and there are huge numbers of minicabs on the road. Sorting out the disgusting state of our public transport would be a good start there...

Buses are driving slower not 'more slowly'. Slow is a comparative term. Compared to walking buses are faster. The World is a circle without a beginning and nobody knows where it really ends. Now all join in with the rest of the chorus.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_gB9beh0bc


I'll return with some serious comment.

Lots of reasons buses are travelling slower - or journey times longer. Or less faster speeds or less shorter journey times


Roadworks and increaased traffic including increased population

More workplace deliveries in particular Amazon in central London

Roadworks associated with the Cycle Superhighway, Crossrail and the continued resedential and office developments - for example the Shard screwed up the London Bridge area for yonks

Reduced bus lanes and vehicle lanes due the CS

Smaller vans as there is a shortage of qualified drivers for larger vehicles and the pool of old gits like me that can drive 3.5 - 7.5 tonnes is getting smaller

Possibly longer dwell times on lights to give greater priority to pedestrians

Black cabs roaming around without customers as a legacy of the highly protected market (try getting a bus on the strand at about 10.30 and just see).


This is a mixture of informed and casual views.


I'm not aware of the impact of home deliveries vs old school shopping.

What I do know is you don't have to lengthen bus journeys by much to reduce demand and people to return to their cars. IF you want to get people out of cars then make it difficult for them and make cycling more attractive.


Hopefully that bus driver's son/geezer is onto this.


Of course it is all the EU's fault so things will magically improve when we leave. Actually some common standards would not go amiss for example (can't remember why) there was a rejection of longer wheelbase buses in the UK.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...