Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wonder if anyone knows the answer to the following:- Not after detailed advice just really an indication of whether this is doable or not.


Both my boyfriend and I are employees of our own limited companies. I am currently on maternity leave receiving SMP but have been looking into child care needed for me to work again.


If we were to employ a nanny as our childcare solution, could we employ her by one of the companies thus avoiding paying for childcare out of our personal (net of tax) income?


My gut feeling is that to do so would incur a taxable benefit to the value of childcare for the employees concerned (me ?) presumably negating the benefit of emloying the nanny by the company rather than personally.


Thx :-)

I looked into this a few years ago, and I got varying answers from different sources, either accountants or Mums-in-Business helplines. I think there is an option to pay yourself dividends as income instead of a higher salary, then claim childcare vouchers, although it seems pretty complex to set up. There is also some option to have a 'workplace creche' but it wasn't suitable as we work from home.


I didn't go for the nanny option, just went for a childminder supplemented with a bit of tax credits instead.

Hi ClareC, we're in the same position and were advised that we would not be able to employ the nanny through our business as childcare/nanny etc didn't fall in to the current nature of what our Ltd company is listed as doing. The one thing we have done is to register for the full value of childcare vouchers thus negating some tax. You don't have to pay yourselves a silly salary to do this. Good luck.

I've been told frequently it doesn't work though I have also heard people saying they claim. I don't think it's within the rules and, worse than being charged to tax n the benfit in kind, might even constitute evasion(!!).


your only alternative is to become an MP....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...