Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw a parking enforcement chap getting set to ticket a car parked across the dropped kerb in front of my garage door. Explained that the neighbours are fine to park there as I don't need the access, and they've left cars there alone ever since. I'm pretty impressed that they remember, it can't be easy.


My neighbour came into the road when I was having the conversation. She gave the fellow a right old ear bashing for the fine she had just been sent for the same thing. Anyway I wrote her a letter and the fine got cancelled, so it's definitely worth appealing if it has happened to you.

Dear Edanna, I asked Council officers for an answer to this problem. Here is their reply.


Enforcement of parking adjacent to dropped kerbs was decriminalised in 2003 in line with "London Local Authorities Act 2003" (section 14) (This was later added in the Traffic Management Act 2004)

This has become the responsibility of local authorities within London to enforce the dropped kerb.

Southwark Council has been enforcing dropped kerbs since 2006 within the Borough. However there are procedures in place to issue parking tickets (PCN)


RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES


Dropped kerbs leading to a single occupancy property is only enforced if the resident contacts the parking services to complain about a vehicle parked on the carriageway in front of the dropped kerb leading to the property.


The telephone number residents need to call is 0207 708 8587 which is staffed between 6am to 8pm Monday to Saturday.


A mobile Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO-traffic warden) will attend the location to issue the PCN.

Southwark does not have a car pound anymore, however occasionally a truck is hired to re-position persistent offenders.


BUSINESS PREMISES OR MULTI OCCUPANCY PROPERTIES


Vehicles parked adjacent to dropped kerbs leading to a business property or multi occupancy properties (such as a block of flats) are ticketed without receipt of a phone call.


I hope this has been useful.


Yours Sincerely


Councillor Charlie Smith

East Dulwich Ward Labour Member

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Those 5 bedrooms are all tiny though. Even the largest of the master bedrooms in these old jerry built houses are often no larger than 15 square metres. For context the minimum size for a two man prison cell is 8.5 square metres.  It's hardly palatial luxury being offered round here. And after you've paid £155,000 in tax to buy the house, and another £3000 a year to the council to empty your bins twice a month, this greedy government is coming after you now taxing you what amounts to another 12.5% of the value of your home every ten years. 
    • There is nothing in the budget to promote growth, which is what we desperately need. The wealthiest pay more already, with the higher rate tax. I’m sure they can afford £7.5k but we need to encourage successful people and business to invest and stay in the country. 
    • I went to a girls' public day  school in the fifties and sixties. The first school rule was "courtesy and consideration to others are expected at all times".  There was quite a high number of Jewish girls, both in the junior and senior school. I don't recall a single incident of anti-Semitism. Is this something confined to boys' schools, or was my school unusual?
    • The biggest problem in the UK is that we don't know if we want to be a European social democracy or the US when it comes to tax - and we are left with the worst parts of both. The US has a strong growth economy and incentives that has lead to high standards of living for the middle classes. Europe has high tax, but distributed fairly across different earners, and has lead to good public services and satisfaction for all. In the UK, we have an ultra-progressive tax with disproportionate burdens on high earners. But we have poor public services because that tax burden is not spread more fairly and is therefore limited. Meanwhile, high earners feel disincentivised to work and will suppress earnings to avoid tax traps.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...