Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw a parking enforcement chap getting set to ticket a car parked across the dropped kerb in front of my garage door. Explained that the neighbours are fine to park there as I don't need the access, and they've left cars there alone ever since. I'm pretty impressed that they remember, it can't be easy.


My neighbour came into the road when I was having the conversation. She gave the fellow a right old ear bashing for the fine she had just been sent for the same thing. Anyway I wrote her a letter and the fine got cancelled, so it's definitely worth appealing if it has happened to you.

Dear Edanna, I asked Council officers for an answer to this problem. Here is their reply.


Enforcement of parking adjacent to dropped kerbs was decriminalised in 2003 in line with "London Local Authorities Act 2003" (section 14) (This was later added in the Traffic Management Act 2004)

This has become the responsibility of local authorities within London to enforce the dropped kerb.

Southwark Council has been enforcing dropped kerbs since 2006 within the Borough. However there are procedures in place to issue parking tickets (PCN)


RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES


Dropped kerbs leading to a single occupancy property is only enforced if the resident contacts the parking services to complain about a vehicle parked on the carriageway in front of the dropped kerb leading to the property.


The telephone number residents need to call is 0207 708 8587 which is staffed between 6am to 8pm Monday to Saturday.


A mobile Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO-traffic warden) will attend the location to issue the PCN.

Southwark does not have a car pound anymore, however occasionally a truck is hired to re-position persistent offenders.


BUSINESS PREMISES OR MULTI OCCUPANCY PROPERTIES


Vehicles parked adjacent to dropped kerbs leading to a business property or multi occupancy properties (such as a block of flats) are ticketed without receipt of a phone call.


I hope this has been useful.


Yours Sincerely


Councillor Charlie Smith

East Dulwich Ward Labour Member

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...