Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I had to drop my daughters off at a summer club in SE5. I couldn't park anywhere. Not because of a lack of spaces, but because of a completely overzealous and irrational approach to parking restrictions.


You cannot park, even briefly, anywhere within the area between Lomond Grove, Southampton Way and Elmington Road. You would be hard pressed to find more than a few parked cars anywhere within this area - there is no shortage of supply, or obvious, significant demand from residents.


A lot of the area was cleared many years ago by Southwark Council and has only recently started being redeveloped (total incompetence, but another story), so there are fairly large, empty and 'plots'. What housing there is often has it's own parking (the low rise council blocks), so this might explain the low level of obvious demand from residents. I know this area well having lived there for the best part of a decade and I cannot understand why there is a blanket ban on cars stopping?


Their policy has the hallmarks of a solution looking for a problem. I cannot understand why Southwark would want to create large areas where people 'pass through', but do not stop. Think about it, what kind of area is it that lot's of people drive through, but no one stops to actually spend any time in?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would question ‘affordable’. Fit For is £115 per month for the standard (cheapest) membership.    for comparison, the leisure centre on CPRoad is £44 per month (£37 for concessions) and JAGs sports club is £60 per month, they also have various concession or family membership offers 
    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...