Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need easy access to things stored in my understairs cupboard, including meters (which I'm not willing to pay to have moved outside).


I used to have just one door, but the door blocked the whole of the hallway when it was open.


I removed the door and replaced it with a curtain, but it was still a pain getting at things at the end of the cupboard. Everything else had to be taken out to get at them, and then put back again :


Then I removed the panelling under the stairs, but since then it's just all been left open, and although things are tidily stored it just looks a mess with hoover, stepladder, brooms, shopping trolley, ironing board, overflow freezer, random boxes of bird food, etc etc :))


I considered having a carpenter build a system of doors/drawers, but because of the narrow passageway (further narrowed by a radiator) I decided that that wasn't going to be workable.


It seems to me the only solution is a curtain (would have to be divided into several lengths) or what I've recently discovered is called a string curtain, however there are issues because of the triangular shaped space with the curtain slipping down.


I have googled it and found various possible solutions (eg very thin hem so curtain doesn't slip. Clips. Velcro.) but I'm not convinced any of them are going to work very well in practice.


OK getting to the point, has anybody actually used a curtain or curtains or similar to hide the contents of their understairs cupboard, and if so did it work and did it look OK or did it look totally naff???


There are lots of houses like mine (small terrace) round here, so surely other people have had the same problem - and hopefully solved it?!

We had just one door to our under stairs cupboard. As you say, made the low end virtually inaccessible. We had a small triangular door fitted at the low end which has done the trick for us. It's on a magnetic catch, press in to release, so no low level door handle which might otherwise have attacked our ankles. Doesn't answer the curtain question I'm afraid.

Thanks TheCat, I've considered that kind of thing, but my hallway/passageway is far far narrower than in that picture - the drawer would not open fully into it, particularly with the radiator there.


Also, much of what is stored in the cupboard would not be suitable for drawers. I have big things stored in there, not little things like books and shoes.

ours has one door and then the entire wooden panel can be removed in two sections, the smallest being triangular in shape and closest to bottom of stairs to access different bits. they are on hinges and you just pull them out. this was done in the 1930's! tried to attach? photo but too big!!

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ours has one door and then the entire wooden panel

> can be removed in two sections, the smallest being

> triangular in shape and closest to bottom of

> stairs to access different bits. they are on

> hinges and you just pull them out. this was done

> in the 1930's! tried to attach? photo but too

> big!!



Oh that sounds like a clever idea - so you don't actually have doors (apart from your one), you just lift off the panels?


If I PM you my email address, could you send me the pic?

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tried getting rid of some stuff?


I have had a massive clutter clear in the past year.


However I cannot get rid of essential things like stepladder, hoover, brooms, shopping trolley, toolboxes,ironing board (rarely used but still needed occasionally), laundry basket, bucket, bird food etc..


It's a small house and I have nowhere else to put them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...