Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The people I know who lived there described the (mostly) conscripted army as a unpredictable rabble of undertrained, frightened and often drunken young men who also happened to have guns."


A bit harsh there bob. Max Hastings considers it to be the most enlightened and intellectual army in the world, and to a certain extent its true as its made up of a genuine cross section of society.*


Mind you the below analysis of the recent invasion of Lebanon by the US Army College (they did the analysis not the invasion) considers it an army that has got soft having spent 20 years shooting at stone throwing kids from concrete towers (very rough precis there)


http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub882.pdf


*where else would have such a healthy organisation of disillusioned soldiers speaking out about the wars they are sent on.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "No - you went over and shot people instead....."

> more facile nonsense.


> > So in other words they came over and got shot.

> PLus 125 of those were innocent English civilians

> killed by republicans, so don't get all high and

> mighty.

>

> If you're referring to bloody sunday, it was daft

> to send shock troops to police a peaceful civilian

> march, but they were fired on by snipers who knew

> what the response would be and got the result they

> wanted, a huge recruiting sergeant and the

> effective end of the civil rights movement as a

> viable means.

>




Sorry Mockney, but you are way off the right track with that post. Its the sort of analysis I'd expect from an ill informed teacher trying to get the basic British defence over to an English GCSE class. And that's not meant as a put down, its a routine line of argument which is trotted out many times, its both simplistic and one sided. An excuse invested for the disgraceful treatment of UK citizens.


Its Narnia's thread but I wanted to respond to Jah's comment, which implied britain behaved honourably in the face of bombs in England.

Possibly a bit harsh.. and a fair point that a lot can happen in twenty years (or rather, not a lot)


Is having an army made-up of a genuine cross-section of society really a good thing? Like any other profession you ought to have people that 'fit' and are good at it, not people who are made to do it. All our dentists are drawn from a genuine cross-section of society.


  Quote
> *where else would have such a healthy organisation

> of disillusioned soldiers speaking out about the

> wars they are sent on.



That's conscription for you.

Sorry Mick though in fairness I was responding to 'they came over and shot people' which would hardly qualify as 11+ now would it ;-)


Of Bloody Sunday it may be a little simplistic but basically holds water. Of the other abuses, I am aware of them and would never defend them. In fact if you've read me on these boards over the last few years you'll know I've been incredibly critical of Britain's recent policies and often horrific past.


I consider all forms of empire to be intrinsically evil, and any form of coercion through violence to be barbaric, hence my hatred of neo cons, new labour and Israeli policy.


On the other hand I do have several friends who served in NI and they are unanimous in what a dark, depressing and terrifying place it was to be posted, one of whom lost friends there. Without exception they considered Bosnia less awful as at least they felt they were doing good there.


Incidentally I also know several Israelis who have served across 2 generations of conflicts there, and the younger ones have similar thoughts about their postings (actually the air force guy who served in the first Lebanon invasion was none too thrilled either).

To a certain extent I do sympathise with soldiers who want to do the right thing for their country in general but have governments who's ends are more nefarious.


Even in this case as someone posted out, pity the poor IDF men who were given this task; they'd have known it was an absolute turkey (no pun intended) of a mission.

Surely, by now, the phrase 'weapons of mass destruction' can only really have a very limited usage - as a feed line for jokes on panel shows.. that sort-of thing?


It was completely ridiculous in the first place. Say it a few times. It even sounds ridiculous.


Weapons of mass destruction

Weapons of mass destruction

Weapons of mass destruction

Weapons of mass destruction


See? Ridiculous.

Mockney - I'm not surprised to read that you have friends in the forces having read your initial post. I'd suggest you would have been influenced very differently if you had friends who lived in Derry in the 70s. There are two sides to every debate. I'm suggesting yours is the traditional British one.


Sorry but I am also unimpressed with anyone that claims other people's posts are "more facile nonsense". Its a bit high handed.

Fair points all Bob.


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Possibly a bit harsh.. and a fair point that a lot

> can happen in twenty years (or rather, not a lot)

>

> Is having an army made-up of a genuine

> cross-section of society really a good thing? Like

> any other profession you ought to have people that

> 'fit' and are good at it, not people who are made

> to do it. All our dentists are drawn from a

> genuine cross-section of society.

>

> > *where else would have such a healthy

> organisation

> > of disillusioned soldiers speaking out about

> the

> > wars they are sent on.

>

> That's conscription for you.

Perhaps, but then my best man grew up in Derry in the 1970s, he used to bring back rubber bullets from his holidays after he'd moved here to my school; his dad, a good friend of mine with whom I've discussed politics more often than I care to mention, was himself a school mate of a certain Mr McGuiness, so I'm not showing bias, just empathy.


And again, in all fairness it was at the very least a simplistic post wasn't it.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps, but then my best man grew up in Derry in

> the 1970s, he used to bring back rubber bullets

> from his holidays after he'd moved here to my

> school; his dad, a good friend of mine with whom

> I've discussed politics more often than I care to

> mention, was himself a school mate of a certain Mr

> McGuiness, so I'm not showing bias, just empathy.

>

>

> And again, in all fairness it was at the very

> least a simplistic post wasn't it.



It was a very simplistic post Mockney. I'm afraid there is no getting away from that. I expected as i was typing that you might come back with a Derry friend. That said, he has a bit of work to do to, to balance your views. I doubt many people from Derry would be impressed with your analysis of Bloody Sunday.

Indeed I'm sure they wouldn't Mick and I genuinely wasn't trying to stir, sorry if I offended.


Vince, I'll have to look into it, but I've a feeling that we didn't really get involved in Burma after their independence, mind you that was 1948, not sure about straight after the war.

We did indeed have a policy of effectively extrajudicial executions in what became Malaysia, but one of the reason counter-insurgency was more successful than in most places was that the communist rebels were mostly ethnic Chinese with little support among the locals and thus rather easier to tell apart.

Again, something of a might makes right, and not something I would approve of, though in this case the locals, taxed, intimidated and often murdered by the insurgents, probably did!


Perhaps what he meant was that they crossed into Burmese territory where they hid out to carry out the executions?

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz let's say, for arguments sake , a group of

> activists were able to beat up a group of heavily

> armed highly trained , combat ready soldiers.

> Killing NINE people seems an insane over

> reaction. I'd like to think our troops would never

> act in such a way. And btw where is St Obama in

> all this? Imagine US reaction if, say, iranian

> soldiers killed nine civilians in similar

> circumstances. I mean, I support the guy, but he's

> been a bit of a pssuy on this. He should take a

> break from scoring cheap populist points against

> BP and show

> some actual leadership on this important

> international issue. Its time to man up.

> His government is israels chief supporter and

> sponsor, after all.


Over and above the question of whether the IDF should be there or not (and I'm fairly sure the answer is that they shouldn't), if I am armed with a paintball gun and a revolver and a bunch of people are smacking me with iron bars/wooden clubs/whatever, I know which one I will be reaching for.


I can see the right and wrong of both sides of the Israel/Palestinian argument. Israel needs to recognise Palestine's right to exist as a country and Palestine and surrounding countries need to recognise Israel's right to exist as a country. Both need to sit down around a table and negotiate; but neither side really want to. I think the world should be encouraging both sides to find a solution - taking sides is only making the situation worse. Too many people are using the Palestinians to further other causes.


Personally, I think Gaza should be declared a UN enclave with the appropriate peacekeeping troops until a solution is found. Demilitarise and disarm the area completely and get the necessary aid in. Then sort out the politics.

If anyone wants to urge their MP to sign an Early Day Motion which condemns Israel?s attack on the aid convoy, supports the UN?s call for an independent enquiry, and demands an immediate end to the blockade of Gaza as well as a lasting settlement establishing an independent state of Palestine just visit http://www.psc.iparl.com/lobby/50 and put in your postcode - easy as that.
Did anyone hear that someoneon the ship who was trying to photograph the Isreali commandos was shot dead for his troubles. I wonder how much footage that isn't isreali propoganda we will actually get to see after they have finished searching the boats and their occupants.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...