Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think I might start buying the Telegraph they have been doing some great investigative journalism recently on the politicians, but more to the point they've printed it too.


This paper used to be the darling of the upper classes and other assorted toffs,

but now their remit seems to have changed and for the social good,

a dramatic change of direction and they seem to have achieved their transition superbly.


Full marks to the Telegraph, and they also have a good crossword too, which is a bonus.

Not to belittle what the guy must have gone through in his life regarding his sexuality and the motivations for what he did but for someone who is supposedly such a genius he seriously miss read the public mood at the moment. Did he not think this would get out or that considering what has happened over the last year it would not (quite rightly) cause him no end of trouble?


The Telegraph is just the Daily Mail with bigger words though. Borderline xenophobia and homophobia with the odd bit of patronising the poor thrown in to make its readers feel righteous.

matthew123 - whilst Laws did something wrong, what Danny Alexander did doesn't seem wrong to me. CGT laws give you three years to sell a residence that has been your main home.


I think the fact that no one else has picked up on the Danny Alexander story probably indicates it's a lame duck story that the Telegraph has tried to pump up.

Despite a good article from Matthew Parris in The Times yesterday in defence of Laws, it was right that he resigned.


The new Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander should also resign immediately. If you're about to oversee draconian cuts that will result in thousands of redundancies with the consequences of relationship breakdowns and repossessions then you need to come to the job with clean hands and suitable qualifications. Danny Alexander has neither.

Latest from The Guardian:


David Laws in talks over informal advisory role


Downing Street confirms that Laws, who resigned last week, may play an informal role alongside Danny Alexander, his successor


Polly Curtis, Whitehall correspondent

guardian.co.uk, Monday 31 May 2010 21.51 BST


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/31/david-laws-danny-alexander-economics

The Guardian wrote:-

Laws, the former chief secretary to the Treasury, was the subject of intense speculation today after friends expressed concerns that he might quit parliament altogether.



Who would choose a fraudulant embezzler for any post in the treasury?


There are honest people in this land but not it seems, in politics.


Would that be because they have to twist, turn, and make deals before landing there in the first place, ensuring their place in the "Commons" leaves them with "soiled hands"?


Tebbit wrote in the Telegraph:-

"I very much doubt if anyone could form a government based in the House of Commons without including some of those who have transgressed the rules on expenses."


Which all bodes well for the future of the "new era"!


Laws was in it to the tune of forty thousand pounds.

I know a guy who defrauded an insurance company of seven hundred pounds and got two years gaol for that first offence.


Laws is reported as being very wealthy,

if that is the case why should he be exempt from due process of the law of the land,

it's not as if he was desperate for the money for his personal survival,

he is hardly a starving waif. More 'snout in the trough' syndrome.



Wouldn't it be a shock to read the headline Laws becomes an outlaw, gets four years for fraud.


It'll never happen............

Embezzling? It wasn't fraudulent to claim back rent - MPs are allowed to do this on expenses. If he'd been living somewhere else, or indeed doing as many do and claiming morgtage repayments, it could easily have been more than 40k. It's a question of whether it was wrong not to declare who his landlord was.
?950 a month to rent a room? I have had a look on the forum and this is well over the odds. It makes me feel quite sick - all nods and winks- the sooner there is a purpose built block of tiny flats in vauxhall for all mp's fitted out with basic fittings the better. the closer it is to a scummy estate the better- and they will have to walk the street with real people and see what life is like for most of us.Preferably a pub outside with shouting and broken glasses/ fights too. ( bitter - me??)Maybe a few screaming drug dealers with guns too..........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...