Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One for female cyclists (sorry fellas): are you familiar with the Breeze network from British Cycling?


It's a network of bike rides led by women for women, to encourage more women to get cycling. If you're on Facebook, check it out here.

Website


It seems to me that ED is just the sort of area that has people motivated and helpful enough to set up a local network.

  • 3 weeks later...

It was my misfortune to catch the tail end of the bike rally yesterday. Who knew sitting in a cab would put one at a disadvantage with sight lines.


To the chap who was totally naked on a Boris Bike: eeeeeeeeeew. Sincerely hope you wiped the saddle.

Personally, I found the naked cyclists edifying and delightful and I didn't perv in the least. Although I was witnessing from the front, rather than from the, ahem, rear.


LM, slightly delayed reaction due to being out of commission for a while, but welcome on the Breeze thing. I don't cycle in London myself - scares the bejesus out of me - but a good friend works for British Cycling and this is a big initiative they're trying to push. Apparently women are under-represented - seems that's not the case round here!

Yeah... the ones on Boris bikes did make me wonder...


The thing that made me laugh was all the nakedness... and then clumpy shoes on the feet. Understandable but amusing none the less. One of the papers had an amazing photo of a woman who had a wheel painted onto her back to one side with a chain going across the other side of her back, around her waist and then with a chain ring painted around her breast. Stunning piece of work...


Rosie - should you ever want to try cycling in London, I'll happily figure a route and go along with you. This time last year, I was of exactly the same opinion... This year I cycle 100 miles a week on London roads. :)-D

hey guys,


ECG doesn't do it naked, but the rides are varied. We did Farthing Downs on Sunday, then the longer riders headed off to Reigate.


If you want to ride, the cold days for some of those on the thread have long gone..... even the rain this Sunday had zero impact on the riders.


And the Reds keep cycling on!




PLH

a bloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Any chance all you cyclists could make those

> longer rides even longer....and one way?

> Just keep cycling and cycling til you drop of the

> white cliffs of Dover like a load of Lemmings.


> Imagine how lovely the roads of London will be

> then for all us drivers. :)-D


1/10


Could do better for Friday afternoon.

a bloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't wait til they introduce road tax for

> cyclists and compulsory cycling proficiency tests.

> Then the roads will be a white van man's paradise

> again...just like in the olden days. (tu)



Sorry to burst your bubble, but the days of cheap oil are well and truly over, so the 'olden days' won't be coming back any time soon whether compulsory cycling proficiency tests and vehicle excise duty are introduced for bikes or not.


By the way, there is no such thing as road tax.


Roads are paid for by everyone from general taxation.


Vehicle excise duty is paid according to the size of your vehicle and level of CO2 pollution you produce.


As bikes emit no CO2 or other pollution I imagine any vehicle excise duty payable will be zero, just as it is for low/zero polluting cars.

Why oh why don't cyclists make themselves more visible. The number of times I see cyclists wearing dark clothing which renders them barely visible, even when they are carrying children on their bikes for goodness sake.


There should be a law that makes it compulsory for cyclists to wear some kind of visibility aid such as a day glow bib, or a sash or anything that makes them visible. How on earth can they expect motorists to see them if they do not take precautions to make themselves seen.


There used to be an advert that encouraged people to 'Wear something light at night'. Cyclists should wear something that makes them more visible all the time they are riding their bikes.


I ride a cycle, and yes, I do wear a day glow sash and day glow cycle clips.

Vilmos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why oh why don't cyclists make themselves more

> visible. The number of times I see cyclists

> wearing dark clothing which renders them barely

> visible, even when they are carrying children on

> their bikes for goodness sake.


Personally, I put on high visibility clothing when cycling simply because, in my opinion, it makes me more noticeable to other roadusers and that this will, hopefully, lead to fewer collisions etc. However, not everyone shares the same view. A friend of mine says he doesn't bother with "special high viz" clothing on the basis that it has become ineffective, ironically, because of the high number of cyclists who actually do wear it. He also believes that, as "so many others" don such gear - even in daylight - such as street cleaners for example, that, for him anyway, wearers of such, no longer stand out. He may be right, I don't know. However, I certainly "feel" less vulnerable attired in my fluorescent jacket; in the same way as I "feel" safer wearing a helmet. However, I acknowledge that "feeling" and "being" less exposed to the perils of road use are two very different concepts.

A friend of mine says he doesn't bother with "special high viz" clothing on the basis that it has become ineffective, ironically, because of the high number of cyclists who actually do wear it.


So drivers shouldn't put their lights on in urban areas because everyone else does it?


This person sounds like a candidate for a Darwin award.

A reflective yellow vest guarantees high visibility, but who would wish to be seen in such a garment?


In Summer I think there is no need to wear such things. In winter I have lights. This is sufficient.


I never wear a helmet.


These are my choices and I take my chances as does everyone who crosses a road who has chosen not to don an American Football suit for protection.


Making laws on such things shows a contempt for individual liberty and an incessant appetite for clogging the parliamentary timetable with yet more unnecessary legislation.


I expect you to drive as carefully as I cycle; and as to how you can see me - use your eyes, like you do for every other road user. I shall do the same. Together we may, just may, get along famously.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Because they have been awful - scoring own-goal after own-goal. You cannot be an apologist for their diabolical first 100 days on the basis that the previous lot were worse - in the same way the whole of the 14 years of Tory rule was tarred with the brush of despair about their very worst behaviour in the latter years Labour run the risk of their government being tarred with the same brush on the basis of their first 100 days. It has probably been some of the worst 100 days of any new government and Starmer's approval ratings aren't as low as they are without reason. You know they are in trouble when MPs start posting the good bits from their first 100 days - it's a sure sign they know they have a problem. And when this government have a problem the frontbenchers disappear from media interviews and they roll-out the likes of Pat McFadden to provide some air cover. Yesterday it was farmers. Today it is the pensioners being pushed into poverty by Winter Fuel payments. It's a perceptual disaster and has been since day 1 - they have to get a grip on it else this leadership team is doomed. You highlight the very problem here. Farmers are not being gifted money. They are being gifted assets. Assets that they don't realise as they continue to work those assets to provide food for the country. Most inheritance is cash or an asset (a house) that people sell to generate cash. Passing a farm to younger family members is very different. On the news they interviewed a farmer whose family had owned the farm since 1822 and he broke down in tears when he spoke about his 13 year old son who was working in the farm to continue it - no doubt in the realisation that his son would be hit by a tax bill when he took it over. Given farmers are not cash rich then the decision would likely be that they would need to sell some of the land that generations had worked hard to build to fund the tax bill - and so many farms are on a knife's edge that it might be enough to send them over the edge.   There are many valid reasons why the government are doing what they are doing but those reasons are not cutting through and they are losing control of the narrative. That is a massive issue for them.  
    • Another great job by Simmonds Plastering. This time he decorated the newly plastered living room and added a pantry cupboard in kitchen.  He is reliable and works really hard.  Highly recommend 07949 180 533
    • Because land has been exempt from inheritance tax wealthy individuals (like Clarkson and Dyson) have used it as a tax avoidance measure. Clarkson is on the record stating that he bought land for precisely this purpose. It is people like him who farmers should be angry with, if anyone, because they have exploited a loophole, which is now being (partially) closed. Yes, I do grasp the concept of inheritance - it's were one is given money, or valuable assets by chance of birth (having done nothing to earn it). As money you have earned, is taxed, it seems odd that money you have not, shouldn't be. I assume you don't disapprove of income tax? Why do you think people coming into a massive, unearned windfall shouldn't pay tax, but a nurse who works hard for everything they earn, should? Everyone has to pay inheritance tax over a certain threshold. In my opinion, if you are fortunate enough to be gifted any amount of money (whether cash, or a valuable asset), to quibble about paying some tax on some of it, seems rather entitled. Most farms worth under £3m will still end up being passed on tax free. Those that do have to a pay inheritance tax will do so at just 20% on that part of it that is over the threshold (rather than the standard 40%), and they'll have 10 years to do so (usually it is payable immediately). So it is still preferential terms for those being gifted a multimillion pound estate. 
    • Ah yes, good spot! Thanks for the link. It sounds like they are planning a licensed restaurant with a small bar from reading through the application. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...