Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It brings to mind the parable of the rich man making a show of his huge donation to charity and making sure everyone sees him. Then a little old lady is embarrassed by her meager contribution. The moral being that the fat cat gave less than he would ever even notice not having and the little old lady gave all that she had.

I think (except for a small number of noble exceptions) human nature is to look after number one and get away with as much as possible - regardless of how much you have. A spot of tax evasion here, a bit of cash-in-hand there.


'The Poor' always say it's because they aint got naaffin' and life is 'ard. But when any of them 'make it' they retire to enormous new-builds in Surrey, realise that their tax burden is actually now around %50 of their income and immediately hire a clever accountant to give away as little as possible - cos they bleedin' earned it, didn't they?

The poor believe themselves to be the most generous because they haven't got much.. so if they put 10p in a tin they're a saint.


The rich believe themselves to be the most generous because without their grand donations to charity and higher tax contributions the country would be on its knees.


The middle classes worry and debate endlessly about whether they're generous enough with their cash or not - and err on on the of caution by just keeping as much of it as they possibly can (like everyone else).

hmmmmm. In my observation as an outsider to this horrible little thing known as the british class system the divide between middle and working class is not clearly defined along financial lines anymore. It seems more about how people see themselves or more importantly how they want people to see them.
Ha! I was wondering when someone was going to bring up the dreaded C word again. The middle classes in general I have found to be as tight as two coats of paint. But let's put it this way, CitizenED's post got it about right IMHO, although in my experience and I have friends who are extremely rich and friends with absolutely nothing but on the whole it's the latter rather than the former who I have found to be more generous with their time, money and spirit. And if I can quote the late Jeffrey Bernard here "you meet a better class of person in the gutter."

Jah - couldn't agree with you more. When I moved into my new house in Feb, my next door neighbour, the only other council tenant in my row of houses, gave me a welcome present, has given me stuff for my granddaughter and bones etc for the dog, they invited my daughter to their granddaughter's birthday party and helped me clear the jungle that was my back garden.


The rest of my neighbours are all nice as it goes, but these ones who have been the most generous aren't working.


I have friends with money but more friends who are broke (like me), and I find the ones who have little, care less about hording their money and tend to live for the day. When I had my own business and started making serious money (it's all gone now!) I helped everyone I knew, because I'd been broke before and knew how it felt. When I was later on my @rse, many of the people I'd helped were there for me.


If my neighbour needs help with anything that is within my power to help with, I've got her back.


Thats how you survive at the bottom, but people who have never had to struggle don't understand this way of banking.

Whilst I agree that rich people are the tightest I think it's important to note that 'this way of banking' relies heavily on the giro.


Being generous with other people's money is of debatable merit and giving up time when you are out of work is probably preferable to staying up all night watching jobfinder on Ceefax.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...