Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"If I say that I don't hold individual members of the Labour party for Corbyn's mistakes, any more than I hold individual members of the Tory party responsible for Cameron's mistakes, does that mean I'm explicitly equating Corbyn with Cameron? No it doesn't."


Yes, it does, and correctly, in two ways. Firstly it recognises their equivalent status i.e. as leaders of their respective parties, and the nature of those parties. Secondly, it doesn't differentiate between the roles, responsibilities and actions of each of them - it implies that their mistakes (whatever they might be) are qualitatively comparable.


Now apply that reasoning to Corbyn's statement.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "If I say that I don't hold individual members of

> the Labour party for Corbyn's mistakes, any more

> than I hold individual members of the Tory party

> responsible for Cameron's mistakes, does that mean

> I'm explicitly equating Corbyn with Cameron? No it

> doesn't."

>

> Yes, it does, and correctly, in two ways. Firstly

> it recognises their equivalent status i.e. as

> leaders of their respective parties, and the

> nature of those parties. Secondly, it doesn't

> differentiate between the roles, responsibilities

> and actions of each of them - it implies that

> their mistakes (whatever they might be) are

> qualitatively comparable.

>

> Now apply that reasoning to Corbyn's statement.


You need to learn the difference between "explicitly states" and "implies." You have chosen to infer that Corbyn is equating ISIS and Israel. He has not explicitly done so. You can argue that that's what he means if you want, but to say that he has explicitly equated them - as you have - is simply untrue.

By the way: "A spokesman for Corbyn later clarified that the Labour leader had in his speech been referring to states of an Islamic character, giving the examples of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran or Hamas in Gaza." So in fact explicitly NOT equating Israel and Islamic State.

"A spokesman for Corbyn later clarified that the Labour leader had in his speech been referring to states of an Islamic character, giving the examples of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran or Hamas in Gaza."


Oh, that's all right then. If that's what he says he meant after he's caused a political firestorm, it must be true.


We're not going to agree on this - suffice to say that equating Israel with murderous fanatical thugs is entirely consistent with Corbyn's stance on Israel for the last 30 years

DaveR Wrote:


> Oh, that's all right then. If that's what he says

> he meant after he's caused a political firestorm,

> it must be true.


The alternative being that we take what you say he meant as true, of course. As per previous, if you choose to interpret what he said as equating Israel and ISIS that's up to you, but don't say that he did so explicitly, because he didn't.

  • 2 weeks later...

This existential crisis makes the Michael Foot leadership and subsequent SDp/Liberal pact look like a cosy trip to the seaside for the Labour in comparison to its present woes.


If Andrea Eagle is the best they have to offer as a replacement for Corbyn, this it is likely they are looking for the next Kinnock to guide them back into sensible opposition until a better candidate takes them to an election victory many years down the line. I can see them being in the wilderness for at least a decade, if they even remain as one. Very depressing for democracy.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because he is very popular with members

> (idealists), but much less so with the

> parliamentary party (pragmatists).


Members = Social Media savvy text-a-crowd.


PP = Has anyone got any more Post-It Notes?...

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This existential crisis makes the Michael Foot

> leadership and subsequent SDp/Liberal pact look

> like a cosy trip to the seaside for the Labour in

> comparison to its present woes.


Yup!!


I'd like to see Corbyn gone, but if that end is achieved by keeping him off the ballot, the trouble will be far from over.

An interesting idea being bandied around... the Leader of the Opposition is defined as "Leader in that House of the party in opposition to Her Majesty's Government having the greatest numerical strength in the House of Commons.".


The Leader in that House. You could interpret that as not (necessarily) being the official party leader.


Can the 178 rebel Labour MPs propose a new Leader in the House, and therefore the leader of the opposition?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If Labour had any business sense (yeah, I

> know...), they'd up the ?3 supporters fee to ?50

> or even ?100 and at least make some dosh from the

> upcoming debacle.


And right on cue the Beeb is reporting:

"Only pre-February Labour members get a vote

Posted at 21:03

Only people who joined Labour before February will be able to vote in the leadership contest, BBC chief political correspondent Vicki Young says. It looks like anyone who joined after then will have to pay an extra ?25 to become a "registered supporter" - and will get a two-day window in which to sign up."


Lots of lovely dosh...

Well at least we'll now probably get a new political party emerging from the current turmoil. The consensus seems to be that with Corbyn in charge the old Labour party will split by the end of next year. I would hope to see that happen sooner rather than later, so that a new centrist 'Common Ground' party can emerge to challenge the Tories rapidly and effectively.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect a party that represents organised labour not to be "hard left", or have some elements of that. Labour's problem isn't Corbyn, it's that organised labour is a marginal force these days, the world has changed around them. The honest thing would be for the "centrists" to break away and create their own social democratic party or whatever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...