Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ive out this here knowing that the editors will shuffle it over to an area they think is more appropriate. Never mind!


I am a Labour Party member, and the local MP has written a letter explaining why she has supported the vote of no confidence in Jeremy Corbyn.


Here is my reply; If you want to you can copy/paste, pass it around etc.


https://www.facebook.com/rgutsell2?fref=nf


Hallo Ms Hayes MP

I am writing this with the feeling that in view of the numbers involved its unlikely to be read, but I want to state my view.

It is being presented to us that Jeremy Corbyn does not have the support of the majority of MP's.

What you, and the parliamentary MP's need to "get" is that you do not have the support of the ordinary and natural Labour Voters throughout the country. The Labour party had the opportunity to present itself in a new light in last the Labour leader contest, and failed miserably. This failure is not just of the Labour Parliamentary group. It is a failure of the "First past the post system", of the Blairite "win the minority middle ground" approach, and indeed of Parliament itself. Parliament has become the bastion of privilige, wealth, careerist politicians, corruption (the expenses scandal) and penetration by business and lobbying.

Unless you and the parliamentary team grasp that it is not the voters who have left you, and that it is the PLP's who have left the voters, you will make no,progress.

The PLP treated Corbyn appallingly; they, and the right wing press, mounted an attack that was reactionary, misandristic, ageist, classist and hateful. The PLP and the press, demonstrated their utter inability to handle change. And that is incredible, since it is change that is expected of the voters.

I see no one in the PLP who has the integrity, or the creativity to present anything other than another "Tory Lite", PR ready, slick and bland alternative.

If the PLP ousts Jeremy Corbyn, I will cut up my membership card and return it to you in pieces,

Yours Sincerely,

R N Gutsell

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112557-letter-to-local-mp-hayes/
Share on other sites

I disagree with you gutsell. I and many others who voted for Jeremy can also not longer support him and if someone like Angela Eagle stands will vote for her. 41% of the membership did not vote for Jeremy. They have a voice too. We need a leader that can bring all sides of the party together.


Every MP was elected by LABOUR voters under the leadership of Ed Milibnad. Confusing membership with electorate is the biggest error being made by many die hard Corbyn supporters who just can't seem to accept that there are other MPs on the left who would do a better job of leading.


I want McDonnell to stay, and the left direction to continue, but I also want a leader that is a natural leader. Jeremy isn't that. Sorry.

Shame she didnt see fit to follow the party's rules on challenging a leader and decided to follow a well organised coup whilst hiding in the shadows until so much damage has been done to the party that a leadership election is inevitable.


Not what i would call great leadership material.


If a decent leader had presented themselves the JC wouldnt have won, no one did.


If one emerges from under their rock i would be happy to lend them my vote, unfortunately i don't think any one will

"What you, and the parliamentary MP's need to "get" is that you do not have the support of the ordinary and natural Labour Voters throughout the country."


Frankly you're making one heck of an arrogant assumption about what Labour voters think. I suspect that Corbyn has s lot of support, but not as much as much as you think.

All this party politics at a time of acute national crisis is palpable.


We need leadership from our Government and from the Official Opposition. The bickering needs to stop, and we need to quickly decide the runners and riders, call a leadership election and get over with. Time to move on to more important things than self indulgence.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi. Have you managed to find any groups in the area? I'm also a woman with ADHD and looking for support/discussion ideally locally.
    • Went to the junction today to check the "scene of the event" to try and work out from the tyre marks on the road and the damage to the kerb, what were the contributing factors to the accident. Here are my observations and deductions. 1.Compaction type refuse collection trucks, such as these, are exceptionally "tail-heavy" due the the weight of the hydraulic compaction mechanism and the fact that this weight is positioned on the  rear overhang ie behind the rear wheels. 2. To compensate for the extra weight, the truck is fitted with a "tag axle". The tag axle is located  forward of the rearmost axle. When fully laden, all the rear tyres will be running at very close to their operating limit. 3. The tag axle has only 2 wheels as opposed to 4 wheels on the rearmost axle. So on either side at the rear, there a three wheels. So if one rear tyre on the near side has lost pressure,  the weight carried by the remaining two is increased by 50%. 4. Being tail-heavy with a high centre of gravity, the driver of such vehicles should be ultra cautious when cornering. 5. When turning to the right,  the weight imposed on near side tyres is further increased depending on the speed involved. 6. The two long curved tyre marks on the road  suggest that only two of the 3 tyres on the near side were taking the weight.  7 These curved tyre marks end abruptly and I'm trying to work out exactly why. This spot is  very close to where the  near side rear wheels  slide up against the kerb and the wheel rims gouge out chunks  of the kerb stones. There is a possibility that the driver braked late and so caused the tyres to loose all grip and so slide into the kerb. If there are any forensic traffic experts around, I would welcome their take on this.
    • I don't think there are stupid questions Sue.  There are informative questions, policy questions, normative questions.... You suggest to do a sort of survey! Interesting idea but not for me as I have other priorities and if I do not address these with NHS doctors I will go, once again, privately.  In any case as many people using this forum know, GP surgeries in England offer at present services that in most cases do not and cannot cover matters that are under the remit of secondary care - for instance rheumatologists clinics in hospitals. If the dismantlement of NHS England will bring possible positive changes also in primary care with more choices for people  I do not know but I would really hope so because at the moment lot of people with chronic rheumatic conditions  fall into the cracks  of he system, that means are not seen by NHS rheumatologists that have long queues and cannot be cured by GPs neither in most cases, even when (I am sure about this and I would like to know more) there are physicians and local GPs fully qualified and experts to do such jobs even if they are not rheumatologists!    Thank you for your time Sue and by the way  if you do any survey like the one you mentioned please let us know. 
    • There was a thread about this a year ago that included a post from the new owners. Be great to have an update - nothing seemed to be happening when I walked by last week. https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/343709-kenro-press-empty-shop-forest-hill-road/#comment-1662773
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...