Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Very open question and very keen to hear different views.


My situation

Getting married and will start trying for a baby in the next couple of weeks. Both are in decent jobs and have paid for the wedding ourselves. All the money spent on that will now start to be saved monthly meaning within a year we could get a decent deposit together to fulfil our aim of buying a house. We are currently renting.


What to buy

We aim to move out of London to be closer to our families - most likely on the commuter belt but anywhere from Kent, Sussex or Surrey. Our dream is a country pad with lots of space but this will prove difficult for our first home. Looking around at the different help to buy schemes available I have noticed 2 things. The help to buy ISA is good, but limits you to a property of under ?250k outside of London and we are in a position to spend a little more. The Equity loan scheme would allow us to buy a bigger house and sooner too but limits us to new builds. Fully apprecaite that this needs to be paid back but would aim to do this within the 5 years so as not to incur interest.


Does anyone have experience of buying new builds? Any known pitfalls?

Are they like new cars in that they lose a % of value as soon as you move in?

Would we expect new builds to become cheaper as the companies have taken a hit on the stock market? Does this make them more appealing?


Any insight appreciated - quite daunting as a first time buyer anyway but made harder with the current uncertainty in general.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112442-new-builds/
Share on other sites

With older properties it's probably easier to see any likely problems and not be fooled by new plaster/paint but it depends whether you are practical people or not. New builds should come with a guarantee though (if it's signed off) and that's why they have a small premium. I wouldn't hope for a reduction on price because of the share price drop (if anything, reduced borrowing for future projects may mean the lack of supply pushes the price up further). I'd always be worried about buying a new build that's had the price reduced (is there another reason for a quick sale?)

If you're having children then a shiny new house (no DIY/dust) may make things easier but remember that children grow up and want to kick a ball - older properties outside London tend to have more space.

New builds come in various shapes and sizes but the typical modern estate has less opportunity to extend (no empty loft space, or too shallow) when your family gets bigger.

I don't have personal experience of buying new build but friends who did (and didn't get anyone else to check it over first) were shocked at how cramped it was when they moved their stuff in. Beware the show home room layouts with reduced sized furniture! If you look at an empty property it will look even bigger. Take a tape measure and check the actual dimensions yourself.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112442-new-builds/#findComment-1015931
Share on other sites

Agree that the hit they are taking won't directly decrease their asking prices. They will simply build less (for now) and sit on the land they already own, therefore re=balancing supply for the market. Their asking prices are much more driven by the market more generally (I often found they tried to charge a slight premium to equivalent properties locally).


I've looked at new builds a fair bit, and my parents almost went for a new build last year. The company behind it makes a big difference. You have to go out and look at their work in person. I found huge variances in quality (fixtures, size of rooms, how solid walls and floors are). Some were awful, and some were consistently great (Telford, the Berkeley Group, Taylor Wimpey had some good ones). This is obviously reflected in prices.


For your other questions - you still need to know the local market (including non new builds) as that's the only way you'll really know if their asking prices are crazy. They don't lose value immediately after you own it, assuming the original price was commensurate with local stock. There can be some benefits if you buy off plan, like choosing the kitchen or colours or floors, but agree that you need to be able to picture your unit well as show homes can be idealised.


In the end I didn't buy a new build, but only because I was selling so I couldn't afford to put up with an estimated completion date 12-24 months from putting down a deposit! The range was too wide, but it sounds like this isn't an issue for you.


If you find a good company, and a good area, it can be a great buy. For places outside of London - look carefully at the local area and whether infrastructure is there. My parents looked at a development they liked, but it was a company building an entire community from scratch (literally nothing for miles around, the developer was planning to build a supermarket, school and so forth). They weren't comfortable with this - what if it didn't all work straight away? If it's just a few new houses within an existing community I personally think that's better.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112442-new-builds/#findComment-1016029
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...