Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And I thought lies around immigration that may

> > have led to a mentally vulnerable man murdering

> an

> > MP equally diplorable.

>

> Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal link

> here no matter how Remain tried to create one. The

> man was unfortunately mentally unstable.


Again, can you provide any links to anything to back that up?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And I thought lies around immigration that may

> > have led to a mentally vulnerable man murdering

> an

> > MP equally diplorable.

>

> Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal link

> here no matter how Remain tried to create one. The

> man was unfortunately mentally unstable.


He was also involved with Britian First who two weeks before the murder told members that any 'muslims in offical positions, like MPs and Mayors were now enemies of the state'. I think it's clear where his motivation lay and why he selected his local MP. She had publically worked for taking Syrian refugees. You have no way of knowing either if Jo Cox' active local campiagining for remain is what provoked his interest in her. So best not to make assumptions about her murder either way eh - or make claims that the remain camp used her murder for gain when they didn't as well.

And of course there is that thing isn't there. That a Brtish MP is murdered by a white British man, and he's mentally unstable. Far right ideaology couldn't possibly have played a part.


But a Black muslim convert murders a soldier in Greenwich, and he's evil, and all of islam is at fault.

Yea I know Blah blah, it is of course poor taste, but let's face it - anyone who brought up that awful murder as a 'decent' argument about why we shouldn't be 'whinging' is highly unlikely to listen to any alternatives to their own beliefs with an open mind.

In reply to etta166


I agree that Brexit is not necessarily inevitable (although the UK would be a laughing stock if we went cap in hand a la Cameron to the EU to say we've changed our mind)


Next year Hollande is likely to be out of a job and Angela's position is looking shaky. We might get new players in positions of power in the EU who decide they cannot keep framing EU rules for the benefit of Germany and France and maybe the little people have genuine concerns.


In such circumstances the Uk could agree to stay in a reformed EU with head held high and in the knowledge that the bravery of the U.K. Electorate in voting leave helped liberate Europe.


All the more reason to delay activating Article 50. The British people are now calling the shots. If the EU says it takes up to 7 years to negotiate a trading agreement why not say ok once we're happy with your trading agreement proposal then we'll activate Article 50

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's ok Keano, taste is a very personal thing. I

> suppose I should have said that I found it

> distasteful, but you are completely within your

> rights to not think bringing up Jo's murder was in

> poor taste.


Ah, I now understand your point and see why you might find it in poor taste. I thought Bryan Appleyard's article on this very point interesting in today's Sunday Times though. Worth a read.

He ignored my comments too Joe (conveniently). Bedtime for me too.


"anyone who brought up that awful murder as a 'decent' argument about why we shouldn't be 'whinging' is highly unlikely to listen to any alternatives to their own beliefs with an open mind."


Agreed heartblock.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He could be referring to this

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk

> (the cannabis addled his brain I daresay)


From the article:


According to the tape recording, which was posted on the right wing Guido Fawkes? website, Mr Straw said: ?We need to recognise that people have been pulled up short by Jo Cox?s death.?


He added: ?It is now time to make a very positive case for why we want to be in the European Union to? set out the risks that we face if we leave, but to call out the other side for what they have done to stir division and resentment in the UK.?


Doesn't quite match the accusation, does it?

There are certain things that there just shouldn't be referenda on. Like this one. it was utterly stupid, irresponsible, disgraceful, you name it. britain is a laughing stock, but more than that, the British have caused global financial instability, and losses. As well as igniting extremism in the UK, the whole world are totally pissed off with the British for messing things up for everyone.


Keano you haven't seen the start of the whingeing...

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Blah Blah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > And I thought lies around immigration that

> may

> > > have led to a mentally vulnerable man

> murdering

> > an

> > > MP equally diplorable.

> >

> > Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal

> link

> > here no matter how Remain tried to create one.

> The

> > man was unfortunately mentally unstable.

>

> Again, can you provide any links to anything to

> back that up?


Personally I was offended by this use of Jo Cox's death by David Cameron in his Twitter account (on the day the Leave vote was said by the polls to be ahead for the first time):


David Cameron Verified account 

‏@David_Cameron

Jo Cox's strong voice in the campaign to remain in the EU will be badly missed. Her final article, published today: https://www.facebook.com/StrongerInCampaign/posts/1196877127019276 ?


Maybe unlike you guys I am particularly sensitive about politicians trying to weedle a bit of what they might perceive as an advantage out of someone's murder, but that struck me as extremely unfortunate and for me (rightly or wrongly) suggestive of someone who would stoop at nothing to try to win and save his own skin.


And before you start ranting - I voted to remain. But I am far from unhappy with the result, despite all the hysterical nonsense and false facts and hyperbole being bandied about. I think long term we may well be better off. Time will tell I suppose. One thing is for sure, defeatist hysteria isn't going to help in any way at all.

Also, on that note, for example people whining on about how the economy has crashed is just errant nonsense. We are still EU members with full access to the single market. We have not even yet given notice of leaving so nothing has actually happened to the economy yet (good or bad).


If any of you are referring to the FTSE market then I suggest you get a life and start looking at reality. 7 days ago (i.e. before the vote) the FTSE 100 opened at 6021. This morning it opened at 6049. 28 points higher than a week ago, so it was up on the week of the Brexit vote, not down. Yes it went down on Thursday as speculators cashed in (in fact I did ok on some short positions - in a very moderate way) and profits were taken from the FTSE's earlier inflated position, but really - they are markets - what do you think they are!! You can't look at one day's fall (actually, in this instance a few hours in one day) and start running around talking about the economy taking a hit! Well, you can, but if you do, don't expect your opinion to be taken seriously by anyone with more than a passing familiarity with the true facts, or economic principles.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, on that note, for example people whining on

> about how the economy has crashed is just errant

> nonsense. We are still EU members with full

> access to the single market. We have not even yet

> given notice of leaving so nothing has actually

> happened to the economy yet (good or bad).

>

> If any of you are referring to the FTSE market

> then I suggest you get a life and start looking at

> reality. 7 days ago (i.e. before the vote) the

> FTSE 100 opened at 6021. This morning it opened

> at 6049. 28 points higher than a week ago, so it

> was up on the week of the Brexit vote, not down.

> Yes it went down on Thursday as speculators cashed

> in (in fact I did ok on some short positions - in

> a very moderate way) and profits were taken from

> the FTSE's earlier inflated position, but really -

> they are markets - what do you think they are!!

> You can't look at one day's fall (actually, in

> this instance a few hours in one day) and start

> running around talking about the economy taking a

> hit! Well, you can, but if you do, don't expect

> your opinion to be taken seriously by anyone with

> more than a passing familiarity with the true

> facts, or economic principles.


The Economy is all about what Speculators think about the future.


If things are crashing they think the future is not good.


But give it a few weeks and we'll see - I have fears.

John L said


"The Economy is all about what Speculators think about the future.


If things are crashing they think the future is not good."


But this was exactly my point! The FTSE went up last week - it hasn't crashed! That's not to say it might not do so some time, of course it might, but my point is that some people are hysterically saying it HAS when it hasn't! This is not a matter of opinion - the FTSE index is published data!


It's fine to say I think in future there might be problems. To say oh look the economy has tanked (meaning the FTSE) is not - because it hasn't.

Brexit Thursday


Fri. ? water turned into blood; fish died. ...

Sat ? frogs. ...

Sun ? biting insects and wild animals. ...

Mon ? livestock disease and boils. ...

Tue ? fiery hail. ...

Wed ? locusts. ...

Thu ? darkness.


The following week is expected to calm with periods of warm sunshine.


Foxy

Robbin, the FTSE may have gone up slightly, but UK buiness are 14% down, the pound is a third down, and ?100bn losses have been made. You are the one that needs to understand that FTSE trading is business done accross the world. When you look at performance of UK business on the markets it is all down.

Trading was suspended in Barclays, RBS and Taylor Wimpey today. Easyjet is in trouble too.


Robbin, I appreciate that it is difficult to get a grasp of what is going on with the financial markets as a whole if you're not regularly immersed in the area, but please appreciate that we genuinely are facing serious economic consequences right now. I've explained why repeatedly on this forum.


This is not an ideological position based on euroscepticism or Europhilia - this is the inevitable consequences based on the fact the markets know the structural impact of leaving the EU. The banks know this and are looking to get out of Dodge.


You may have been told by Brexiteer campaigners or certain portions of the media that this was propaganda. To people used to two different political parties exaggerating potential doom if you don't pick them, I can understand why you might be inclined to believe the advice that supports your own desires. This is not propaganda. The markets don't care about democratic deficits and impact of immigration, whether we are culturally richer together or not. The markets care about whether they will be able to trade in the EU or not, and whether there is a risk of systemic financial failure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...