Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

> >

> > > Effectivly the ?350m is correct. It's like your wages.. You get what is left after Tax. National

> > > Insr. & stoppages.

> >

> > Foxy, even Farage has admitted the ?350m/week

> > figure was a bare-faced lie.

> >

> > And your analogy is wrong. It's more like getting 40% off a ?1000 television, and then telling

> > everyone you paid ?1000 for your TV. It's a lie.

>

> Dont see the connection.. but along the same lines

>

> Its like paying ?53 ffor a t-shirt marked down

> from ?75.00* and thinking you have saved ?22.00

> when its only worth ?6.00

>


I think you are now being purposely obtuse, Foxy. No one is that stupid.


I notice you also skipped over the fact that Farage has admitted the ?350m/week was a lie.

No matter what, the silly old Fox won't back down


Even if he was on fire, he'd not admit it was burning him


He's got O.D.D I reckon, so ignore him, it's a waste of your effort, it's pure attention seeking on his behalf


But if you want Morris dancing or a card trick, he's your go to guy

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > DulwichFox Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > >

> > > > Effectivly the ?350m is correct. It's like

> your wages.. You get what is left after Tax.

> National

> > > > Insr. & stoppages.

> > >

> > > Foxy, even Farage has admitted the ?350m/week

> > > figure was a bare-faced lie.

> > >

> > > And your analogy is wrong. It's more like

> getting 40% off a ?1000 television, and then

> telling

> > > everyone you paid ?1000 for your TV. It's a

> lie.

> >

> > Dont see the connection.. but along the same

> lines

> >

> > Its like paying ?53 ffor a t-shirt marked down

> > from ?75.00* and thinking you have saved ?22.00

>

> > when its only worth ?6.00

> >

>

> I think you are now being purposely obtuse, Foxy.

> No one is that stupid.

>

> I notice you also skipped over the fact that

> Farage has admitted the ?350m/week was a lie.


And I notice that you missed out the bit where I said that the offer was in an E.D. Shop.. Question Air in fact

and there are people that stupid.


Foxy.

Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions on this forum, and I would never knowingly undermine you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid. Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and just admit, look I've got it wrong.


We have been lied to on this and I honestly believe we will come to regret our decision.


Louisa.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No matter what, the silly old Fox won't back down

>

> Even if he was on fire, he'd not admit it was

> burning him

>

> He's got O.D.D I reckon, so ignore him, it's a

> waste of your effort, it's pure attention seeking

> on his behalf

>

> But if you want Morris dancing or a card trick,

> he's your go to guy


Gave up dancing in 1992.. so sorry, cant help you ..


As for O.D.D.

My boss once said. Bad Points

**** will never let the subject drop and will continue arguing his point


... Then he said.. Good Points

**** is a good engineer. He will never give on any Technical Problem until he finds a solution.



Yep I am tenacious. That is true. But tenacious people who may really wind some people up are good problem solvers and get things done.


And do not go on about narcissism... I am defending the O.D.D. accusation.


Foxy.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have respect for people's opinion, but on this I

> can no longer justify the decision that has been

> made. Not only have we, the brexit supporters been

> lied to in a big way. We have also overseen the

> potential collapse of our political system as well

> as upsetting the international community, many of

> them close friends and allies. We have also

> allowed a vacuum to develop in which some rather

> distasteful opinions have emerged which are making

> some people who are guests and great contributors

> to our country feel unwelcome and deeply

> troubled.

>

> Foxy and toffee, you have both been lied to on

> this and that really isn't any exaggeration. We

> need to respect the fact that some people have

> been hit quite hard by this decision we have made

> and it seems to me that we should now have a

> period of calm reflection, in which some of us

> hold our hands up, admit we have been wrong- and

> somehow help to fix the mess we have unknowingly

> unleashed on the population.

>

> Louisa.


Respect, Louisa..!

Early election..?


Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 there are only two ways to get an early General Election 1] Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 only a motion explicitly resolving "That this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government" is treated as a motion of no confidence which, if carried, triggers a general election. A government can lose a vote of no confidence by a majority of just over 50%, requiring it to resign. Parliament will be dissolved if no new government can be formed within 14 days of a no-confidence vote. 2] The Act also permits early dissolution if the House of Commons votes by a supermajority of two-thirds. The second option is unlikely to happen. The first will be unpalatable to the incumbent government so how viable is an early election..? Should these not occur, the election will take place on 7 May 2020.


Alternatively they could repeal the Act entirely but what about the Lords & other legal challenges..?

Yes I don't think it will suit Labour to have an early election (they have no money for one right now), so can not see a challenge to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act being sucessful through the house. Repeal of the Act would also take time.
  • Administrator

Hi Louisa


In light of your post and the fact you're being honest in admitting your decision was wrong, I find that very admirable and you have the freedom of the forum back. Of course if you hijack threads and take them down the class warfare route again you will be sectioned again but in the meantime... go make hay...


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions on

> this forum, and I would never knowingly undermine

> you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid.

> Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and

> just admit, look I've got it wrong.

>

> We have been lied to on this and I honestly

> believe we will come to regret our decision.

>

> Louisa.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Louisa

>

> In light of your post and the fact you're being

> honest in admitting your decision was wrong, I

> find that very admirable and you have the freedom

> of the forum back. Of course if you hijack threads

> and take them down the class warfare route again

> you will be sectioned again but in the meantime...

> go make hay...

>

> Louisa Wrote:





> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions

> on

> > this forum, and I would never knowingly

> undermine

> > you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid.

> > Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and

> > just admit, look I've got it wrong.

> >

> > We have been lied to on this and I honestly

> > believe we will come to regret our decision.

> >

> > Louisa.



Sorry for going pff topic but this reminds me of

last nights Game of Thrones. Repent and obey, watch out for the wyldefire Louisa.

Thankyou Admin for my reinstatement. I shall weigh up my options, and consider whether I want to spark the EDF version of Article 50, by once again posting outside of the Lounge.


I think it is only right to accept the fact that I am a polarising figure, and my return to the rest of the forum will cause some turmoil for a brief period at least. At this time of forum uncertainty, let me be clear. I shall not be posting in the main section anything regarding class, hipsters, yummy mummies or gastropubs. I will however, speak my mind about the coming of M&S and its detrimental effect on the local population (from all social classes), and my sadness at the loss of Iceland.


Finally, let me just say this. It has been a pleasure being confined to the lounge this last year. I have discovered a new purpose, a purpose far beyond the neatly trimmed hedgerows of ED. I can now admit when I am wrong, and I can weigh up my options before coming in full throttle.


Louisa.

Note to JoeLeg- no, not on medication nor in total denial, rather a pragmatist who just gets on with the job, and knows we've been through worse. I would suggest that patronising comments such as yours from a supposed position of superiority is what had nearly 17 & a half million of us screaming for the leave button! Sigh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
    • Yes thanks that's exactly the choices I get.  I will block and if somehow they find a way back I'll report.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...