Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This of course means allowing another Scottish referendum for the same reasons. And sooner rather than later.


I always felt this was too close for any one side that won (whichever it was) to go steaming ahead without taking the feelings of those on the other side of the argument into account.


Cameron made a mistake promising the referendum but may not have got his majority without it so he can sink.


I think there needs to be a general election and a new government chosen that sets out exactly how it will deal with EU and what negotiations will take place and with exactly what aims. Once the electorate knows what those plans are a second referendum is probably right - all this should happen asap and before the 'button' is pressed.

maxxi Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

>

> I think there needs to be a general election and a

> new government chosen that sets out exactly how it

> will deal with EU.


I agree, but it is not clear how such a manifesto could be formed, or implemented (remember the Scottish MPs). Rather it suddenly looks quite likely that a new centre party will emerge - the non-Corbyn centre-left joining the non-Ruritanian centre-right. Their leader will win the election easily, and on a manifesto that the General Election itself is the new referendum and a promise to remain (because by that time we will know how the EU plans to punish us).


If you think this is far-fetched think about the position of centre-left and centre-right politicians at the moment: virtually all of whom (of course rightly) think that brexit will be an unmitigated disaster.

I agree with that too. Only thing I'd say is, EU is not planning to "punish" us, other than, it will have to allow the natural consequences of our decision to flow.


It would be playing right into the hands of existing anti EU propoganda to call this punishment or vengeance. Any more that you are punishing a 5 year old who tantrums out of a party by declining to follow her from the room offering sweets.


WM x

DulwichFox Wrote:


>

> If we backtrack on any democratic vote that does

> not suit some individuals we lose our democracy..

>

> I suspect there are those not willing to embrace

> democracy and the outcome of any democratic

> decision that does not suit them.

>

> DulwichFox


Do you think the first past the post method of choosing MP's in this country is democratic? The usual result is that party representation in parliament does not represent how the people have voted. But that's ok I suppose. Really?

messageRe: EU Petition new

Posted by DulwichFox Today, 10:48AM


NOBODY questioned the referendum voting system when it seemed very likely that Remain would win..



Er, I think you'll find the Brexiteers did:


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nigel-farage-eu-referendum_uk_576e6585e4b08d2c56393f12

messageRe: EU Petition

Posted by Toffee Today, 12:09PM


How will signing thos petition change anything? On this basis the whole voting system will have to change. If I vote for the tories in the next general election and labour get in. Does that then mean all tory voters can demand a re-election?



The voting system would not need to change. A referendum is advisory only. It isn't legally binding in the way an election is.

Actually, that's why I signed too. I doubt it will get more than a debate in Parliament as promised. The Brexit side seemed to feel they had a corner on the market of being able to beat their chests and howl with rage about feeling their country had been hijacked. They would be the first to be raging if we'd voted in on a narrow margin people were saying within hours of the vote that they felt deceived into voting Remain.


Rage rage against the dying of the light etc.

It will give the opportunity for the many, many Remain MPs to argue against Brexit and against the whole validity and truth behind the Brexit campaign. I'm not sure of the numbers but if there's a cross party vote then the motion for a second referendum might be carried.


(Difficult tactical choice for the SNP)

Corbyn doesn't want us in the EU. Historically, he was anti-EU as many hard leftists are (EU state aid rules make nationalising assets very difficult). I don't believe for a second that he wanted us to stay, which was pretty obvious from his weak campaign.

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I start a petition not to have another

> petition?


Lynne, that is the entire point of the demand for another referendum.


I did not have to read Kant to realise that there is an aporia in the notion of a single referendum. Aporia: the idea of a single referendum undoes the conceptual basis on which it is posited. IF the will of the people is sovereign on any particular issue THEN the will of the people must be consulted on EVERY particular issue.


Now, this aporia could be sutured: we could have a rolling (of course, online) market for/against EU exit with a deadline of 2 years set when article 50 is invoked. Now how do you think that market would unfold as we came to study the consequences?


I do not have to think referenda are a good idea to think that IF we have one THEN we should have many.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13810676
    • Police should be redirected to stop cyclists.  Well that is what is being suggested elsewhere Telegraph journo either put a message on social media that was hate crime, or just plain hate and that did not meet the bar for hate crime.  In any case it is a potential hate crime and I'd like my police to respond to this - up to them how and the priority. It's been picked up by the rabid media including GB news, as yet another thing to rant about. Edited, to add.  I've been subject to crime over the years and wouldn't like to trivialise it.  It's wrong,can be highly personal, and frustrating when the criminals are not caught.  One of my early threads here was when a bike was stolen and immediately on Gum Tree  I'm not in the hug a hoodie brigade, although we should understand why people may be attracted by criminality and society needs to address this  However I detest those who use the opportunity to plug their own agenda, as soon as the Telegraph journo was quoted that set me off  
    • There was someone of that name living in Wandsworth over ten years ago.  I can PM the address if that would help?
    • PCSO's  are NOT real police,  They DO have the power to ask the real police to arrest someone, but then again so do you and I?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...