Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was almost always disappointed with nannies and au pairs, it seemed as if you were adopting someone's child, rather than getting in somebody to help lighten the load.


I would find a senior-ish citizen probably more useful as they can cook, and generally do not block the sink, the lou, or the washing machine, in other words they have more life skills.


The best Nanny we ever had was in her late thirties when she started, and mid forties when she finished. The youngsters we had were just a trial of one's patience.

It important to remember that aupairs are supposed to be part of your family. They are usually young and can't be expected to do everything or even have had any experience with children.

Often people leave them on their own loads and dont include them in fmaily life and they end up feeling really lonely. When I was a child I had aupairs helping my mother and I loved them. They were fun and had lots of energy and talked to me in all sorts of launguages. But I have also been an aupair in families where I was treated like a servant. Had to go to my room in the evening andwasn't given the same food as them which was really horrible.

Dear missd,


An aupair is not a nanny or a cleaner or a housekeeper. Aupairs are generally students who come to live in your home for approximately 1 year, who are generally here to study English, and in exchange for full board and lodging (they live as part of your family), and pocket money of approximately ?70 per week, they will provide you with 25 hours of childcare and associated light house work.


I have never heard of an aupair turning up at your home at 8 and leaving at six. They generally do five hours per day (ours works from 7 - 9 am and from 3.30 to 6.30), and they are not to be left in charge of children under 2 and a half. They go to language school during the day.


It is reasonable to ask for two evenings per week of babysitting and they must have two full-days off at the weekend.


People who expect the aupair to work longer, take sole charge of little ones, and do the laundry and cleaning for the family, are generally abandoned with no notice quite early on.


An aupair is a great solution when kids are school age and could do with a big sister type of family member, who allows both parents to work full-time and do the school runs. And I agree with bonce, I have heard of families setting aside separate food for the aupair which is not the quality that the family eats themselves, but when that happens, the aupair will not be happy and she may leave.


Having an aupair can be a bit like adopting someone elses teenager - lots of slamming doors, drunken behavior, even stealing from you, BUT, if you do your research properly and interview throughly and are honest about the job you are advertising, you can find someone who will bring great energy and creativity into your children's lives.


I wouldn't waste time with agencies as they are more trouble than they are worth. Aupairworld is a terrific site.

here here Dulwich Mum. They are here to learn, not to be exploited. au pair ?60-?70 a week ( dep on how many hours- mine just 15 hours) plus food and lodgings- no qualifications.

Nanny ?500 a week - qualifications, CRNB check, healthy meals, first aid, knows the area, can drive, networking etc.


If you have ever had a competent nanny phoning you from hospital with your 18 month old having a febrile convulsion who know exactly what to do - you would understand why nannys are nannys and worth every penny you pay them in the early years.

Then again if you look at some au pair sites you will see not all of them are teenagers, some of them are a bit older and depending on your needs you can specifically look for people who are willing / not willing to cook, clean, look after babies or just older children, drive / not drive, work x hours etc. I have no personal experience on the subject yet but I understand there is a standard weekly salary for x hours and x type of work, and what I would do is first speak to the person before I hire them, see what they are looking for and be fair: if I expect them to do more than the standard I would pay them more too. I do agree that whoever comes and whatever they end up doing for you, when you have someone living in your house they become part of your family and should be treated as such, it would be awful otherwise.

Thanks for the clarification everyone - that's exactly the information that I needed - I didn't really know what an au pair does exactly. It's just that we've been offered one through my husband's work (he's been offered a job overseas and will go on ahead to work and sort stuff out. I will remain here with our children for the first few months. Then we'll all go over together). His new office have offered us the au pair and I needed to be able to tell them how much one would cost).


Thanks all

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No and Wes Streeting is heading in this direction because he knows the NHS is broken and was never built to cope with the demands currently being placed on it. A paid-for approach in some shape or form, and massive reforms, is the only way the NHS can survive - neither of which the left or unions will be pleased about.  
    • Labour talks about, and hopefully will do something about, the determinants of poor health.  They're picked up the early Sunak policy on smoking and vapes.  Let's see how far they tackle obesity and inactivity. I'd rather the money was spent on these any other interventions eg mental health, social care and SEN, rather than seeing the NHS as income generating.
    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...