Jump to content

Recommended Posts

narnia:

you didn't ask a question, you just burbled. I did not refer to you sunbeam so myob


loz and bob and all the other communicants:

you guys are so much more worked up about what I did and when and the fact that I find the lib dems a bunch hypocrits than you are about them being complicit in the breaking of the law.


get a grip sunbeams.


I am now going out for a spot of real life.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ..this just reinforces the view of us

> ordinary...no let's change that to normal

> people...of what a bunch of maggots you political

> sorts are.


Tell me about it. I wonder when the next one will be.


I?m waiting for the ?A Libdem just raped my Labrador? or ?Nick Clegg is a Satanist, I have proof? threads.

davidh.. come, let us stand together now - and sing the Polish national anthem..


A one-a, a two-a, a one-two-three-four..



Jeszcze Polska nie zginela,

Kiedy my zyjemy.

Co nam obca przemoc wziela,

Szabla odbierzemy.


CHORUS

Marsz, marsz, Dabrowski,

Z ziemi wloskiej do Polski,

Za twoim przewodem

Zlaczym sie z narodem.


Przejdziem Wisle, przejdziem Warte,

Bedziem Polakami,

Dal nam przyklad Bonaparte,

Jak zwyciezac mamy.


CHORUS


Jak Czarniecki do Poznania

Po szwedzkim zaborze,

Dla ojczyzny ratowania

Wracal sie przez morze.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So who did *you* report it to? (Since you asked

> the leaflet deliverer about his pay, and knew that

> 'steps are being taken'.)


I notice DavidH that you neatly sidestepped this question. Is the answer too embarrassing, perchance?

I can categorically state no paid delivery of East Dulwich ward Lib Dem literature.

Its all been delivered by really kind helpful volunteers and the candidates including Jonathan Mitchell.

We're all experts on how horrid vertical letter boxes, dogs that head butt the front door, low down letterboxes really are. We find gates with a spring that make a rackets after 9am when after a hards days work at the regular job we're trying to catch up with our deliveries without disturbing people are alarming.

Paying for deliveries mean you have less money for printing and staying within the election limits. You also have to raise the money which for Lib Dems means relatively small donations from members.


Now, what do we suppose Lord Ashcroft's multi millions has all gone on?

Tess Jowell has a slight ?20,000 pa advantage in the form of her MP's Communications Allowance + free postage and packing for letters to remind people she once replied to a letter from someone.


Apologies for grumpiness. I'm exhausted from delivering election leaflets.

Why don?t you and ruffers get a room.


Cool. Nice to see the new local nutter is not going to be a one-thread wonder. Stick around Kev - you're entertaining, if nothing else.


Hang on a moment - is this *really* KD? First, not slavishly haunting his own thread and then he comes on here and forms a complete sentence, properly spelt and punctuated. I smell a rat!


Oh, hang on... the question mark missing. It's KD. Phew.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why don?t you and ruffers get a room.

>

> Cool. Nice to see the new local nutter is not

> going to be a one-thread wonder. Stick around Kev

> - you're entertaining, if nothing else.

>

> Hang on a moment - is this *really* KD? First,

> not slavishly haunting his own thread and then he

> comes on here and forms a complete sentence,

> properly spelt and punctuated. I smell a rat!

>

> Oh, hang on... the question mark missing. It's

> KD. Phew.



=====================================================



I see you like quoting out of context as well, so for the rest of the reader.



Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's brilliant ruffers. I think it truly got to

> the very spirit of this OP with the awesome:

>

> COULD NICK CLEGG TURN COMMON SENSE AND DECENCY

> GAY?



Why don?t you and ruffers get a room.

I got a ballot card through the post a few days ago - was addressed fully and looked official .. apart from the Labour Rose and the photo of Mad Hetti on the top. The instruction on the ballot card was to report to the Labour Party representative on arrival at the polling station. WTF?

Ah - I got a 'Good Morning' one from the Lib Dems. I wouldn't mind but it's a bit hazardous first thing in the morning while carrying newborn bleary-eyed down the stairs to find unexpected paper (banana skin-esque) on the wooden floor.


No diff to all the pizza/curry menus though so not a deal breaker...


I'm going to feel sooo unpopular tomorrow. I guess the result will give me something else to worry about though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...