Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tulip,


Hello there, I generally type summaries of my thoughts, onehandedly, with a squirmer on my knee and expect most people to have ESP and understand! This might jsut be unreasonable - ;-). Let me clarify.


Most diseases have specific groups at risk, for different reasons. Some are inherited (eg sickle cell, cystic fibrosis), some are environment linked - stress, living conditions etc, and some groups have a predisposition (eg malignant melanoma).


When we balance the likelihood of our child (a) being exposed to the disease and (b) developing it, it is clear that the cost/benefit analysis indicates against taking the vaccination. But we'll see - if numbers and medical advice change, we'll re assess it, as any conscientious parent will.

New Mother, what medical advice are you waiting to be changed? The advice is already for all under 1s to be vaccinated in this area isn't it?


And I don't understand your comment about herd immunity being irrelevant if your child is at low risk. Isn't that the whole point of herd immunity? That the majority get vaccinated to protect the most vulnerable minority even if that doesn't include your low risk non-ethnic child.

New Mother- I know that your post was probably not quite meant as typed!


However, the recommendation is that babies in this area have th BCG. My twins had it at 8 months and we fine with it. Although they may be lower risk that other children in the area as the family aren't travelling in and out of high-risk TB countries, there is enough risk for there to be a recommended vaccination schedule. Ultimately it's not nice having a needle stuck in a young child and it will most likely cause a descrete scar, but would you forgive yourself if your child was one of the few who contracts TB? It's after all vastly more unpleasant and dangerous than the BCG. You are also adding to the herd immunity- I also feel a responsibility to do this as some children can't be vaccinated for legitimate reasons and the herd will offer them some protection too.

My daughter had her BCG when she was about two months old.She is six now and I don't remember it being more traumatic than any of the others, just glad that she won't have to go through the punches in the arm that i endured at the age of thirteen. She has a small scar, and was actually asking me about it today, she's pretty proud of it! Looks a lot better than mine.

My little boy had it about 7 weeks ago. It was all fine actually and was just a bit red until couple of days ago - it's now developing into an angry looking thing with yellow stuff oozing out.. Booked an apppointment to see a doctor later this week.


Seems odd that it's getting like this so long after the injection. Does anyone else have similar experiences?

yep - my son's reaction took at least a couple of months to appear - thought we'd got away with it! And even now, (he had it in November I think) it's still red and a bit swollen - doc says all normal, but def worth checking if worried about infection. The oozing etc happened to us too - yeuch!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...