Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So still no evidence and no explanation?


Just mudslinging and innuendo, unsubstantiated cash claims, luridly coloured flamer websites, fantasies about the High Court of Justice and weird 'secret knowledge'.


If this was the kind of stuff you were putting in your emails to councillors it's not really surprising they'd delete them before reading them. It's possible that you may need treatment, not access to a local representative.


Bonkers. It's just such a shame that you should try to drag down innocent bystanders as you go.

Don't think he's dodgy - A whois identifies him straight away as a small businessman in ED - He'd hide all that if it was dodgy.


Probably feels he's being ignored by Southwark Council



Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So still no evidence and no explanation?

>

> Just mudslinging and innuendo, unsubstantiated

> cash claims, luridly coloured flamer websites,

> fantasies about the High Court of Justice and

> weird 'secret knowledge'.

>

> If this was the kind of stuff you were putting in

> your emails to councillors it's not really

> surprising they'd delete them before reading them.

> It's possible that you may need treatment, not

> access to a local representative.

>

> Bonkers. It's just such a shame that you should

> try to drag down innocent bystanders as you go.

Just a little background on me.


I?m Kevin I was born in East Dulwich in 1960, I went to St John's and St Clement's Primary School, this was when it was in North Cross Road and Archdale Road my favourite teacher there, was Mrs. Best.


My brothers, sisters and I, used to go to the Odeon cinema at Goose Green on Saturday mornings - it was just opposite the petrol station ? flats have now replaced the old Odeon building, that was demolished a few years ago. I remember the police station when it was on the corner of Crystal Palace Road and Upland Road. I also remember that one day in the1970s, the late Queen Mother came to visit the police station, well actually because at that time, it had a very beautiful rose garden at the front of it.

My secondary school was William Penn, yes aka Billy Biro.


So those on this site trying to marginalize me, forget it - I have too much history in East Dulwich, your rudeness and impolite manners will not work on me.


Thank you,


KD.

KD, obviously no-one on this site knows all the details of what has happened, but it's obviously something you feel strongly about. Have you thought about referring it to the Local Government Ombudsman?


They are independent, have the power to get access to documents and council employees that you don't, it's free to you (unlike the High Court) and any decision is made public. If not, may I ask why?

Siduhe


Thank you for your reply, I have look at the LGO route but if you investigate the LGO as I have done, you would see they have no real power, over 50% of people whom work for the LGO are themselves ex-local authority employees. The LGO is just another non functioning quango.


Thanks again for your reply,


KD

Hey KD,


I thought you were going to put the letter up today? I've just checked back on the site and nothing there. You might find you get more support or helpful suggestions if you tell people what on earth you're talking about, rather than just telling them you've lived here all your life.


If I, as someone you've never met, told you that my boss had failed to reply to a number of emails I'd sent, but wouldn't tell you what they were about, yet expected you to boycott the company that I work for as a result, would you do it?

RosieH,


Thank you for your reply,

I wrote today at 09:18AM ?approximately 20 delete emails and 8 letters - So will try have them up on site for tomorrow.?

Sorry for any confusion, but as I said this morning it would be tomorrow, as I need to adobe down the data.


Thank you for your interest


KD

I'd like to know why you only send your letters/emails to LibDem councillors. I thought initially that they must be your ward representatives, but I've just checked and the councillors you've named are responsible for different wards.


So:


- did you send letters and emails to Labour, Tory and Green councillors. IF so, what was their response?

- if not, why not? Did you think they were not worth bothering with? Which leads to...

- if we are saying no to LibDems, whom should we be saying yes to and why?

KD, I'm not really interested and just wonder why you are bothering? There must be many people out there who have felt slighted by one party or another over the years for different reasons. I'd be more interested to hear who you would vote for and why as opposed to simple negativity about the one you obviously wont be voting for.

Loz


Thank you for your reply,

Mr. Tim McNally first wrote to me, all be it a very confusing letter. When I then asked him several time to clarify his letter he chose to ignore my requests.


Yes I did send letters and emails to the other parties and received a reply from them, on one occasion I wrote to Tessa Jowell MP and Mrs Jowell was kind enough to help with an issue. Please note I have no ties to any party.


KD

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll be interested to see how your schools

> attended and memories of seeing the Queen Mum turn

> out to be relevant to whatever complaint it is

> when you give some details.



I?m sorry I don?t remember voicing a complaint.

I do remember voicing an opinion.


Maybe in your dictionary complaint & opinion are the same.


Thank you for your comment.


KD

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry KD, I am still confused. The others

> responded, but you still seem to have the issue?

> And Mr McNally first wrote to you?

>

> I can't make head nor tail of all this.



Please let me clarify things for you.

My original posting was

?I say no to Lib-dem?

I have posted a website given my reasons for this.

I will be posting letters and emails on that website tomorrow.

People can make up their own minds as to how they vote.

Not trying to speak to Loz, but I think this is what's actually being asked.


I believe Loz is referring to your site where you say -


"Councillor Timothy McNally of Southwark Council sent me a confusing letter and

when I asked him several times via both email and Royal Mail to clarify his

letter, he chose to ignore my letters and emails."


- Where Loz says "And Mr McNally first wrote to you?"


Your other "opinions" are over a lack of response to your communications which appear to be initiated by you. This one appears to be initiated by Mr McNally, and Loz is merely trying to clear up whether that is the case.


From my perspective I'm wondering what that opening of dialogue was all about.

So you sent them a letter with some serious allegations, the councillor replied to you saying because of the seriousness of the allegations they've passed it on to the Strategic Director of Communities, Law and Governance.


You then continue to send letters to the councillor about this issue even though you were told it had been passed on. Why not ask the Strategic Director for the details you require?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...