Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KD it sounds like you don't like the people on this forum or who participate in the fair on goose green (fair enough), but who DO you like and who ARE the 'real people of East Dulwich' ?


I been here 20 years since I was a laddie SO does that make me 'real' / UN'real' / somewhere in between ?

What is the demarcation between the 'real' / and 'unreal' populace in SE22 ?


I feel for you and your comments, I really do, but the bit about 'real' people does seem a bit 'us and them' (again, fair enough) mate.


But you're right, you have experienced some hostility.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Out of intrest, what is a "real person of East

> Dulwich"?



I can tell you what their not, their not school yard bullies.


I have watched this site for about two and a half years and I have seen gross bulling of people for asking the most innocent of questions.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KD, when were you appointed the voice of the

> People's front real people of East Dulwich?


I think it was the Queen Mum did it, in the old police station garden.


I knew it would be relevant at some point! Pip pip!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, on your second post of this thread, you very

> cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he

> disagreed with you, so one could argue that you

> started the agressive bullying behaviour.



Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Real Name: Huge Nought

Posts: 3,086

Date Registered: 06/11/2006 16:49

Last Activity: 05/05/2010 15:29

View all posts by Huguenot

KD, if you typed out a conversation - verbatim - of any group of people on an average night at the pub it would look pretty much like they all disagreed, scoffed at each other, joked, got annoyed, concurred, challenged opinions, became friends again etc - not unlike an online forum.


Haven't you noticed how helpful the forum has been to people over the last few years that you watched it too?


PS. I am a 'real' person living in East Dulwich and I have met other 'real' people who live here via this forum.

Katie, until KD advises what HIS meaning for 'real east dulwich person' means I am not sure you can use the same term, because if HIS meaning does not match your current understanding of what 'real east dulwich person' means there will have been a breakdown in terminology !


KD please please expain what is real and what is not real.

I need to know if I am real or not, this is a basic human right whether I vote LibDem or not.

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hidden (but registered users can send me a

> message)

> Real Name: Huge Nought

> Posts: 3,086

> Date Registered: 06/11/2006 16:49

> Last Activity: 05/05/2010 15:29

> View all posts by Huguenot



*absolutely chokes from excessive laughter*


Well, well - KD, you are truly wasted - I honestly haven't laughed this much for about a week (when I found myself piggy-backed on another forumite in the gents attempting to dry my wet jeans under the hand-dryers).


I list my real name as Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones. It means sweet FA!!!!!:))


Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Real Name: Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones

Posts: 2,790

Date Registered: 22/02/2009 12:38



*collapses completely as a result of uncontrolled laughter*

Re: I say no to Lib-dem

Posted by: Keef Today, 05:17PM


Also, on your second post of this thread, you very cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he disagreed with you, so one could argue that you started the agressive bullying behaviour.



Re: I say no to Lib-dem

Posted by: KD Today, 05:23PM


Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, on your second post of this thread, you very

> cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he

> disagreed with you, so one could argue that you

> started the agressive bullying behaviour.



Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Real Name: Huge Nought

Posts: 3,086

Date Registered: 06/11/2006 16:49

Last Activity: 05/05/2010 15:29

View all posts by Huguenot



*absolutely chokes from excessive laughter*


Well, well - KD, you are truly wasted - I honestly haven't laughed this much for about a week (when I found myself piggy-backed on another forumite in the gents attempting to dry my wet jeans under the hand-dryers).


I list my real name as Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones. It means sweet FA!!!!!


Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Real Name: Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones

Posts: 2,790

Date Registered: 22/02/2009 12:38



*collapses completely as a result of uncontrolled laughter*

==========================================



Try keep up

Come on KD - don't slow down now...


I haven't done this in a while, but I'm absolutely pissing myself laughing!!!


Thank you SO much


ha ha ha ha ha


Oh my Lord!...


This is the Thread of The Year - fabulous!


For you KD...please take it...I insist...


http://www.thelondondailynews.com/images/Gold%20Cup.jpg


Oh, such joy.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on KD - don't slow down now...

>

> I haven't done this in a while, but I'm absolutely

> pissing myself laughing!!!

>

> Thank you SO much

>

> ha ha ha ha ha

>

> Oh my Lord!...

>

> This is the Thread of The Year - fabulous!

>

> For you KD...please take it...I insist...

>

>>

> Oh, such joy.



==========================================


You have just demonstrated why people should not abuse drugs and alcohol, whist using a computer. You are clearly over stimulated. Might be time for you to have a little lay-down.


KD

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You have just demonstrated why people should not

> abuse drugs and alcohol, whist using a computer.

> You are clearly over stimulated. Might be time for

> you to have a little lay-down.


Oh my dear KD, there is really no need for such modesty from you. May I assure you that not a drop of alcohol has passed my lips. As for recreational drugs - I never touch them. Nope, you must take the credit for this intense feeling of joy which inhabits me this evening. But I will go and have a little lie down - sound advice indeed.



*still chuckling*

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think so. There is no other logical conclusion.

> Mind you, logic was never a highlight of this

> thread, right from the off.

>

> On the other hand, KD's playground taunts are

> classics in their own right. Some of them I've

> not heard for decades!



========================================


Lets face it logic has never been your tour de force, I also see your still steeling my lines and trying to make them your own, still mimicry is a form of flattery, so I suppose I should thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
    • The situation outside Oru is far worse with their large tables immediately adjacent to badly parked bikes using the bike racks there. And the lamppost also blocking the pavement.
    • Urgently looking for a garage in SE London - Brockley, Crofton Park, Catford, Lewisham, Honor Oak, Dulwich, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Deptford, New Cross, Hither Green or Lee would all work. Willing to pay market rent. Must be available long term. Please call Andrew on 07740 339669 if you have one available.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...