Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually, it can be politically significant. In Oz, where voting is compulsory, the number of spoilt papers always counted and declared. For instance, the referendum for a hydroelectric dam in Tasmania back in the 80's offered two choices, neither of which the environmentalists liked. So, many people wrote 'No Dams' across the ballot instead. 45% of votes were 'spoilt' papers.


Unfortunately, in the UK where is not compulsory to vote, you just end up looking a bit dim and unable to follow simple instructions...

Spoiling your vote to make statement is just childish.


Politicians aren't like mummy and dadddy. If you fold your arms and stick your bottom lip out because you don't like something they won't go down to the shops and buy you a special treat.


Politicians only need to be elected. You 'train' politicians like you train a dog. If they cooperate you put them in power, if they don't you elect someone else.


A spoiled ballot effectively means you've stopped 'training' because you're in a sulk. As a result our politicians/dogs do exactly what they were doing in the first place.


This is so blindingly obvious that spoiling ballot papers is mostly the preserve of first year students and cross-eyed antipodeans.

I dont agree. To not participate at all is childish - its taking your ball home with you and sulking. By not participating you have no right to complain about the outcome.


Getting off your backside and going to the polls or posting your ballot paper is participating and subsequently gives you a right to moan and bitch to your hearts content.


A vote is a statement of belief in one of the options and a "spoilt" ballot paper is a statement of a lack of belief in any of the buggers; but it is still a statement and is a demonstration that you have fulfilled your civic duty to the wider polis.


The fact that your purple flower party didnt get in is unfortunate but at least you can throw brick-bats at those that did.

To paraphrase my post in the Drawing Room


Putting a cross against a candidate's name means I approve of the party and I don't. None of them.


Voting for the least bad candidate is like buying the least rotten fruit. Voting for any of this lot says that I condone theft, lies, wars and mediocrity. I don't want to be represented by any party that has members who in any other walk of life would be in prison.


Not voting is a vote for none of them. Creative destruction of the ballot paper given publicity might help spark the revolution man.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 21 fixtures...   Saturday 31st January Brighton & Hove Albion v Everton Leeds United v Arsenal Wolverhampton Wanderers v AFC Bournemouth Chelsea v West Ham United Liverpool v Newcastle United   Sunday 1st February Aston Villa v Brentford Manchester United v Fulham Nottingham Forest v Crystal Palace Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester City   Monday 2nd February Sunderland v Burnley
    • had to drop a package off at LL.  30 mins in the queue.  Given the no of people, in front of and behind me, conservatively, a working days worth of time.  
    • Selling one's property by oneself  is totally feasible if one uses an online agent to get a listing on  Rightmove. RightMove will not accept listings from individuals however if you use online agents such as Strike ,  Purplebricks,  Yopa,  99Home,  TheHouseShop  etc.  They act as a "gateway" for you into RightMove or Zoopla. They offer Professional photos and floorplans (sometimes optional), Enquiry forwarding and  Optional extras like hosted viewings. 
    • Why would you not talk to someone in a queue?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...