Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My 21 month old has a lisp when she says the "S". She used to be a night- and naptime dummy user but we weaned her off it last month. She started talking quite early and has a reasonable vocabulary, meaning she's had good practice with various sounds already. With the s she still folds her tongue a bit, resulting in a lisp. Her upper 4 incisors are through but only about 80% "down". Her lower central incisors are fully through, her lower lateral incisors have just come through and she doesn't have her canines yet.


Is this lisp likely to stay and require "help" later on or do many kids have a lisp at this stage that will still disappear on its own?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11081-should-i-worry-about-a-lisp/
Share on other sites

I'll be interested in responses to this, as my 3.25 year old speaks with a very prominent lisp when making the "S" sound. Cute as a 3 year old, but not sure it's something that will be so endearing as an adult! I did mention it to the speech therapist at Babble & Squeak last year and she didn't seem to think it was something to worry about at this age, but as my daughter is now speaking without a lisp it makes his seem even more obvious.
Interesting, don't have a clue, kiddies change so much all on their own but then you've got nothing to loose by seeking a professional opinion. I just wanted to add that you could contact Sunshine House on Old Kent Road, run by the NHS. My son is under their care and sees a physio and when he's older will see a speech therapist etc and I have found the services there incredible.
This looks encouraging but I'm not sure if the fact that the -s- needn't be fully developed until age 8 means that a toddler lisp is nothing to "worry" about (I'm not really worried, we're not talking about basic health here, just hoping we won't need a speech therapist).
my son had a lisp when he stopped with the dummy but after a couple of months it stopped and one of the little girls i look after also had a lisp at the same age but you only notice it now and again i think children with a dummy tend to do this but it seems to stop after a while
I had a very pronounced lisp as a child for which I had speech therapy when I was 6 - still have a slight lisp but not many people notice it. I have 2 cousins who also had a pronounced lisp when they were younger (it is a family trait) who did not have speech therapy - and still have a pronounced lisp as adults - don't really think it has held them back in life though. I doubt very much could be achieved through speech therapy at your daughters age and it may well sort itself out as she gets older - I would have thought 5 or 6 would be the earliest anything could really be achieved through speech therapy in any event.

My 5, nearly 6 year old had (has?) a lisp with the 'S' which has certainly decreased over the past few years (hence the has? in brackets as I'd have to listen now to see if it is still there at all).


It used to be very noticeable, and I did speak to a speech therapist about it once who didn't seem concerned.


The Ivydale Surestart Centre has a Speech Therapist there sometimes, so you could easily pop to playgroup and see them at some point if you wanted reassurance. I will try to remember to check the notice board as to when they are there as I think it is only once a month, but if I forget, just phone Ivydale School 020 7639 2702, and ask to speak to Andreas in the Children's Centre and he will be able to tell you. If you are in ED it is quite a nice walk over Peckham Rye Park to the Centre, takes about 15 mins.


Molly

x

I would definitely not worry about a lisp for under 3s. Maybe even not until they're 4/5. My nephew had trouble with Ss and well as Ls (and tends to be a little hard to understand - talks too fast and doesn't enunciate properly), but just a few sessions with a professional at around 5 and a half years cured him almost immediately of the major problems. Prior to that I don't think the correction would have been so quick and easy.


I think the fact that they have a decent vocabulary and communicate happily and confidently is so much more important that the details of how they pronounce certain letters (says the new and improved me!). When our daughter was about 2.5 I freaked out that she was still saying 'f' (instead of 'th', e.g. I'll be free on my birfday'), and harangued her into learning the 'th', but she now says all her 'th's in this rather peculiar and over-emphasised way. I prob should just have left her to gradually pick it up on her own. A speech therapist friend of ours (noting how hysterical I used to be about my daughter speaking perfectly) warned me not to go overboard as kids can develop a stutter if pressured too early.

Good point littleEDfamily, I don't want to pressure her at all, I'm so glad she's such a confident talker, happily mixing up the two languages she's exposed to. We're not fussed about the languages either, we know it'll fall into place... I just don't like the idea of a lisp much but will definitely wait with any kind of proactive guidance until later (if it's still necessary).
My two year old struggles with sssss sounds, it sounds quite sweet. My friend who's a speech therapist says the main thing for smaller kids is that they can talk and be understood. Her little boy, who as you might expect has great language, is nearly 4 and has just packed in the dummy.
Hi! My son used to say L words with a W until he was nearly 5. I took him to the walk in clinic at Townley Road and was reassured by the therapist that if he could make the L sound he should correct himself eventually. She also showed me an interesting chart of what sounds are expected at which age. She was right and the problem has fixed itself! I would really recommend dropping into this clinic for your own reassurance.

Just found this;


General Guideline for Sound Production

3-4 years: p, b, m, w, h and all vowels

5-6 years: d, t, n, g, k, f, y, ng

7-8 years: r, l, s, ch, sh, z, j, v, th, sh


from this website: http://www.earlyinterventionsupport.com/development/speech/articulation.aspx


Molly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...