Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They had a very similar question on QI - Grizzly Bear vs Lion

Apparently in the early 20th century in America they used to have these fights and the bear won every time. Its got a very hard skull and immense power in its arm to swipe the lion and crush its skull.


So i'm guessing polar bear vs tiger would be the same.

Apparently the largest Tiger is the Siberian Tiger that grows up to 350kg.


By contrast Polar Bears start at 350kg and grow to almost 700kg.


Seems like a no contest.


Despite have a polar sounding name, the Siberian Tiger seems to naff around in China, so the two probably don't cross paths.

Baby polar bear - "Dad, am I a polar bear"?

Dad - "Of course you are son, you're a very handsome polar bear".


Baby wanders off.


Baby polar bear - "Mum, am I definitely a polar bear"?

Mum - "Of course you are, and a lovelier polar bear never set foot in the snow. Mwaaah".


Baby trudges off pensively.


Baby polar bear - "Grandma, is it right I'm a polar bear"?

Grandma - "Of course you're a polar bear, look at you! You could be something else"?


Baby wanders away deep in thought.


Baby polar bear - "Grandad, tell me the truth, what am I"?

Grandad - "You, my boy are a polar bear, born and bred. What makes you ask"?















Baby polar bear - "I was just trying to figure out why I'm so f*+king cold"


Thank you, I'm here all week, look after your waitress, I get a share of the tips.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...