Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sadly, I've written to the manager, because ....



Shelves of chicken pieces but no free-range pieces, and I won't buy chicken that isn't free-range.


No organic fruit and veg any more, that I could see.


Shelf after bare shelf - no stir-fry bags or salad (around 6pm on a Friday), hardly any alcohol in the chiller (ditto).


Carton of cottage cheese on display past its sell-by date.


Astronomical price rise in own brand tissues (which have now disappeared from the shelves altogether :-S )



I was really looking forward to the Co-op opening, and from the point of view of stuff that I buy, on the whole it's got worse.


Not because it's a Co-op per se, but because of what appears to be poor management, poor stock control, insufficient shelf filling staff, and/or a lack of research on what local shoppers (ie me :)) ) might want to buy.


I did however buy a load of what appeared to be perfectly good plums reduced to 25p a pack last week so swings and roundabouts I guess :))

I too had high hopes for the Co-op, but was left disapointed. Shelves bare, disinterested staff, a lack of basic food items, fresh items going off too quickly and unpaked items left to rot, general mess. I was only saying to my wife this evening, after a trip there, that the manager seems to be doing a really bad job. I'd have thought, given the obvious investment made in the new shiny store, that more would have been put into training the staff.

I haven't found the staff disinterested, but I do think the management is poor. And I'm not sure that's something you can train, because a lot of it is common sense, surely.


If I don't get a proper response to my letter and if things don't improve I am going to copy the letter to Co-Op HQ because I think it's a real wasted opportunity.


I would rather shop at the Co-op than Sainsbury's, but there's no point if I can't buy the stuff I need - I don't want to have to go to two supermarkets.

I was looking forward to the Co-op opening but couldn't have been more disappointed with the reality once it did. Death by a thousand price cuts. Display stands, half empty, boasted items that weren't reflected by the contents. Dislocated items, abandoned by shoppers who had lost their enthusiasm in mid-trawl, remained unrepatriated. The torn flaps off cardboard boxes and the clear wrapping from multiple packs lay discarded alongside the shelves, ignored by staff and scuffed along by bored children. Newspapers, too many to go in the display stand, overflowed in untidy piles on the floor. My assessment - it's gone downhill from when it was Somerfield. Is that possible? It seems so.


Anyone remember the Co-op chemists? I used to go there as a point of principle, being an old co-operator, but even that lacked the clarity of vision and the stock to make it attractive to the consumer. And now we've lost it, because apparently it was losing money and the victim of theft. Well, even my kids know that with a counter right at the back and no one to stop the opportunist thief at teh door, stock is going to disappear.


I really want to like the Co-op; I truly want to be able to say "yes, I walk up Lordship Lane and go to the Co-op - it has everything I need and it's such a joy to shop there" but I just don't see it happening unless there is at least a manager who believes in what it could be and enthuses all the staff to feel the same.


Oooh, it's good to have got that off my chest............

There seem to be more staff at the tills which is good.


Agree with Sue about the lack of free-range chicken pieces. Somerfield sometimes used to have good bargains on this.


Do not like the quizes on the chip and pin machines which, before you enter your PIN, ask a weird mix of questions like "do you think that there should be more research into the effects of pesticides on bees?" and "did you see the new Pepsi bottle in store today?"

I think the check-out area and the staff are better - especially a young bloke, probably in his late teens, who is very helfpful, especially to elderly shoppers. A lot of the fruit and veg is British and they have organic skimmed milk, as well as decent own-brand soups, olives, dishwasher detergent, washing powder, tonic water etc . On the whole it's cleaner and brighter and better staffed, but I know what people mean when they say they expected more. Answer - keep your hopes low, folks!

I went in Sunday lunchtime, shelves were empty, no lemons?

No keen on new layout - although maybe i need to get used to it.

It seems like the ranges of brand/choices has been reduced in favour of some odd selections like a whole shelf of tupperware products, when we already have shops selling that stuff.

I won't be rushing back.

Worse.

Yes ,sorry ,another vote for it's worse .

Called in earlyish ( before 9 ) and could hardly move for blocked aisles that were being restocked.

Have never seen it so bad .

Loads of empty shelves .

Plus Lordship Lane gridlocked on Sat am ( early ) by delivery lorries .

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> If I don't get a proper response to my letter and

> if things don't improve I am going to copy the

> letter to Co-Op HQ because I think it's a real

> wasted opportunity.


I wouldn't hold your breath, I have twice done exactly that about the Coop store on Forest Hill Rd and after (chasing to get even as far as) an acknowledgement of my mail... I never got a substantive response.

Once I get my teeth into a cause I don't let go :))


ETA: I've also got a gripe because the last three times I've been in, I've been charged more on the till than the price on the shelf for items, twice for grapefruit and once for eggs (you can tell I'm on a diet :)) ).


It's only a matter of a few pence each time, but the thing is, I've never been undercharged, and a few pence for each person buying these items adds up.

Hmmm....now I understand why the service appears to be quicker....no-one is shopping there anymore.


Personally, I have always found the staff to be helpful and polite in there.


Maybe things will improve if those dissatisfied customers let the management know? Its early days...and I hope it gets better for everyone.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>.

>

> Maybe things will improve if those dissatisfied

> customers let the management know? Its early

> days...and I hope it gets better for everyone.


xxxxxxxx


I've already written to the manager. I await a reply......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The main problem Post Offices have, IMO, is they are generally a sub optimal experience and don't really deliver services in the way people  want or need these days. I always dread having to use one as you know it will be time consuming and annoying. 
    • If you want to look for blame, look at McKinsey's. It was their model of separating cost and profit centres which started the restructuring of the Post Office - once BT was fully separated off - into Lines of Business - Parcels; Mail Delivery and Retail outlets (set aside the whole Giro Bank nonsense). Once you separate out these lines of business and make them 'stand-alone' you immediately make them vulnerable to sell off and additionally, by separating the 'businesses' make each stand or fall on their own, without cross subsidy. The Post Office took on banking and some government outsourced activity - selling licences and passports etc. as  additional revenue streams to cross subsidize the postal services, and to offer an incentive to outsourced sub post offices. As a single 'comms' delivery business the Post Office (which included the telcom business) made financial sense. Start separating elements off and it doesn't. Getting rid of 'non profitable' activity makes sense in a purely commercial environment, but not in one which is also about overall national benefit - where having an affordable and effective communications (in its largest sense) business is to the national benefit. Of course, the fact the the Government treated the highly profitable telecoms business as a cash cow (BT had a negative PSBR - public sector borrowing requirement - which meant far from the public purse funding investment in infrastructure BT had to lend the government money every year from it's operating surplus) meant that services were terrible and the improvement following privatisation was simply the effect of BT now being able to invest in infrastructure - which is why (partly) its service quality soared in the years following privatisation. I was working for BT through this period and saw what was happening there.
    • But didn't that separation begin with New Labour and Peter Mandelson?
    • I am not disputing that the Post Office remains publicly owned. But the Lib Dems’ decision to separate and privatise Royal Mail has fatally undermined the PO.  It is within the power of the Labour government to save what is left of the PO and the service it provides to the community, if they care enough; I suspect they do not.  However, the appalling postal service is a constant reminder of the Lib Dems’ duplicity on this matter. It is actions taken under the Lib Dem / Conservative coalition that have brought us to this point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...