Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi...


I've booked my 14 month baby a seat on a BA long haul flight and have discovered that the stipulations for a suitable car seat are pretty strict. They have some available on board but it's on a first come first served basis.


The car seat has to be forward facing with a 5 point harness and compatible with a 2 point lap strap, have no base and be 43cm x 43cm.


If anyone has done this sort of flight before and knows of a suitable make, or, even better, actually has one to sell or lend this would be amazing!


Alternatively, the BA flights allow A CARES (AmSafe) child aviation safety harness. If anyone has one to sell or lend (for a price!) that would be really really helpful.


Either way, any advice would be welcome!

You shouldn't need any of those things?


For take off and landing have your baby on your lap using an infant seatbelt extension (which they will supply). At other times you should just be able to have him/her sitting on the seat if awake, or lying down with the seatbelt fastened around if asleep.


I fly long haul frequently to NZ with my two kids, two of these times we've bought seats for them despite being under 2, and we've never had to use anything special for them. This is with Singapore Airlines, but I'd be surprised if there was a huge difference with BA.


A car seat would (in my opinion) be a real nuisance when flying long haul with an active toddler. My daughter loved being able to climb all over her seat, and when she slept she just lay down on the seat quite comfortably. Same applied to my son at a similar age.


P x

Hi. I recently traveled with my 21 month old to NY and purchased him his own seat. I was told on the phone by BA that I needed to use my own car seat or buy the AMSAFE A Cares harness. I bought the harness and on the way to NY it was great. However on the way back the BA flight attendants told me they had never seen or heard of this harness. They were extremely aggressive and told me they would not allow me to use it. This is after I was told on the phone by BA to buy it, and also used it with no problem on my outbound flight. I pointed out that it was FAA approved and also recommended on the BA website. They told me they don't need to follow FAA regulations as they are a British airline. In the end they compromised and allowed me to use it during the flight but not on takeoff or landing. They also filed " a report" about it. On takeoff and landing I needed to have my son on my lap. I have written to BA as I am flying again in June when he will just turn 2. I am only telling you this as perhaps you should bring a print out off the BA website with you that proves that the harness is a recommended device. Otherwise you may face some opposition. Or you might not like my first flight. I would say that the harness was good however it doesn't sit flush with the BA seats due to the sides of the seat extending out at an angle. So part of the harness sort of pushed into my sons neck but he didn't seem too bothered. Also as an aside there were no car seats even on my return flight so that wasn't even an option.

We have flown a couple times with twin babies on both BA and American Airlines. We purchased extra seats on all the flights. Neither airline provided car seats but we took our own as we needed them in our destination.


BA required us to use lap belt extensions and hold the babies on take off and landing. The car seats had to be belted forward facing even though they were approved for rear facing seats. We were allowed to use them during the flight.


American Airlines allowed us to use the car seats rear facing. They had never heard of the seat belt extensions and were very relaxed. They allowed us to have one baby in the car seat and one on our lap during take off and landing. A couple on one of our flights spent the money for the FAA approved harness and found it great with a toddler who would not stay in his seat unless he was strapped in. The airline belts are too easy for some babies to unhook but you could just use walking reins instead of purchasing anything special.


As a tip, giving your baby a drink during take off and landing is highly recommended as children don't understand they need to swallow when their ears hurt. We found water worked best.

we used one of the amsafe harnesses on flights to/from Thailand but i can't say it was much of a hit with my son, then 17 months. Most of the time he was "on the loose." We borrowed the Amsafe so unfortunately I can't lend it to you. We also brought a copy of our correspondence with the airline about it, in case they asked. It was Thai Airways and they didn't actually have seat belt extensions at all - you were just supposed to hold the child.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...