Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick, I apologise for misinterpreting your initial nugget. It was 5 hours of sport at its very best, and however much I may have wanted Westwood to win, Mickelson was a worthy winner. The really sad thing is that the BBC is set to lose the rights, meaning that from next year you will have to have a Sky Sports subscription to watch this great sporting event.

Oh Rats..



I missed it....


Did they ( the good guys ) get them ( the bad guys )


You know like that scene out of Casino, where they beat him "nasty style" to a pulp



Ewwww , but did Tiger Woods actually kill anyone ?



But he's the new OJ , right..?



W**F

TonyQuinn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick, I apologise for misinterpreting your initial

> nugget. It was 5 hours of sport at its very best,

> and however much I may have wanted Westwood to

> win, Mickelson was a worthy winner. The really sad

> thing is that the BBC is set to lose the rights,

> meaning that from next year you will have to have

> a Sky Sports subscription to watch this great

> sporting event.


I did not know that - I do have SKY but cannot stand Ewan Murray. I think the BBC do a fantastic job on the masters and I have watched it every year since 1980 during which time the team has improved with Ken Brown Sam Torrance and Wayne Grady being great support now to Peter Allis.


It just won't be the same on Sky.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Vispring, I'm not a poet so I don't have enough vocabulary to gush about it, best money I ever spent. Open your wallet, they say you spend a third of your life rafting on it (probably more these days with Netflix).
    • Ah wonderful, I'll pop in and see him One more day and then the fundraiser will close. Just £70 needed to get to £1,500. Thank you all for your generosity and support. Private messages have been lovely. 
    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...