Jump to content

Recommended Posts

interesting question - money, space, age, limited time and attention for more children, all these aspects will impact it. Il be interested to see what people think.


I always thought the ideal family would be - B, G, G


I do however know someone who had 5 children. The middle ones were triplets and were premature hence she had 5 children under 3 years old at one point!

It's odd this notion that 3 is bad number...middle child syndrome and all that. I am one of two as is my husband and we both wanted more than two as we could see the down side of being just 'one of two'. Personally I think the number of children you have and their future childhood experience is much more to do with the parenting and love that the child/children experience than how many siblings they may or may not have.

Three would be our ideal (Mr Smiler is a happy middle child and I would have liked more siblings). But have had some problems trying to have our second child and will be very happy if all continues to go well with my current pregnancy and we are able to have our second.


An even bigger factor for me, though, than money/space/fertility issues is the sleep deprivation. I have never, at any point, felt OK or even halfway OK since the birth of our daughter two years ago. Am like a zombie/blob-like marshmallow in brain and body, and sleep is still a problem. Assuming a similar experience with any future kids, two more kids with two years of bad sleeping each could potentially tot up to six years of sleep deprivation. Not to mention over-lapping night wake-ups between them. Don't think we could take it! Fingers crossed for a dream-sleeper this time, then we may reconsider...


Being pregnant with a toddler is also even harder than I thought, especially changing filthy nappies and dealing with vomiting bugs etc. when have nausea - bleugh!

Oh Smiler - I really do feel for you!! I love the idea of 4 grown up children (2 girls, 2 boys) who all get on famously well and come to visit for my delicious Sunday lunches. So my 'fantasy' would be 4.


The reality is: I had one because I wanted kids (in that sort of vague way you want kids, not knowing quite why) and then we are having a second because I thought she would benefit from a sibling, and once again thought in some vague way that another one was the right thing to do. I am hoping once we have two, I will be blessed with strong feelings to stick at 2, as a 3 child family brings all sorts of new practical requirements I just can't quite cope with. And I am done with giving up beer for months on end; it's frankly no way to live!

Yes Sillywoman, I'm assuming limitless money would mean plenty of help affordable too, in which case, maybe I'd go with what I said in my 20's and have 6 like my Mum did! Though maybe I'd have stuck at 4 (imagining plenty of time to 'pop to the gym' etc. to reclaim figure whilst nanny entertains the Walton style family!!).


But like Smiler, for me the other big issue is fertility, I just don't want to ever have another miscarriage....and also....having a baby at 40 is very different to having one at 35....I feel tired down to my bones most of the time, and I seriously am not sure I'd be able to do it all again, should have got on with it sooner I guess.....sigh.


So.....two will be it for us.....


Molly

I can't even imagine having 6!


I'd like 2, Mrs Keef, 3 or 4, so we'll have to see.


I absolutely adore my daughter, but not sure I'd say I "enjoy" being a parent, as it's a drag, and maybe I'm selfish. I sometimes think there is something wrong with me, as everyone else seems to think it's absolutely the best thing ever.


That said, I guess it'll get more fun as she gets older, and it becomes more fun... Still though, the thought of having 6!!! :-S

Before we had kids I had ambivalent feelings about being a dad, whereas Mrs CitEd had always longed to be a mum. Now we have two boys and will stop there. But as they grow older (youngest is 2 and a half)from time to time I certainly get the feeling that having a third would be nice. It's not so much that three is a better sized family than two it's just that I get a tad envious of those with tiny babies!
Nature is so clever hey...that's my problem too citizenED, I just loooovvvveeee tiny newborn babies. Keep telling myself they don't stay like that for 5 minutes, and focussing on my mostly cross/frustrated 18 month old....but still......sigh......

that's pretty much how me and my husband feel. It just IS a drag - well a lot of the time - not for everyone I know, I mean there are plenty people who do seem to loooove it all but lord it's hard. I spent the first six months basically telling all my childless friends to stay that way! I think that's the thing - there is a big difference between loving your child, and loving being a parent.



Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I absolutely adore my daughter, but not sure I'd

> say I "enjoy" being a parent, as it's a drag, and

> maybe I'm selfish. I sometimes think there is

> something wrong with me, as everyone else seems to

> think it's absolutely the best thing ever.

>

> That said, I guess it'll get more fun as she gets

> older, and it becomes more fun... Still though,

> the thought of having 6!!! :-S

like many people, i think two is ideal. we started too late and had problems though so it's probably just the one for us. It doesn't really bother me though. One is a million times better than none if you are set on having kids and initially can't.


My brother has five and that seems fun but nuts too. (and expensive)


Maybe if I had full time help and cooperative fertility, three or four would be nice.

Mmmmm, age is definitely an issue. There's no way I'd want to do new baby stuff now in my early forties & with other kids to care for. Just too knackered. There's also the 'time for each' issue as they get bigger. Whilst money would help with that I'm sure, without it I just don't think it fair to spread my self any thinner than I do among the four I've got.


Re; the restrictions of parenthood. I felt the same, but I have to say it has got a lot more fun as they've got older, & I'm loving having teenagers, grumpiness, hormones, smelly feet & all (I'm so going to regret saying that aren't I? The gods will come & bite me on the bum now you'll see). They're so funny and witty, and interesting (and beautiful of course ;-)). For me parenthood does seem to get better as the years roll by.

Initially, I always said I wanted three. My son is 15 weeks old now and I think he may be the last one we have :( Not because it's hard, it is but it's easier to deal with now, but because DH *promised* he would cut back on his insane working hours once the bubs came along, but I find myself being alone with the baby for 18 hours a day, seven days a week (Not even joking here, wish I was!!!!). I don't think I could cope with two or three kids under these 'conditions'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...