Jump to content

Recommended Posts

......have we all been there?


Boss - Lets see what you have written?


Me - Here you go.


Boss - ABC?


Me - Yes.


Boss - I think BCA is better.


Me - Really? It's no different is it?


Boss - Take a closer look.


Me - I have. Its exactly the same words except you have just changed the order.


Boss - Exactly, you have. Except I have the same words. Its just changed the order.


Me - *sighs*


Edited due to :-$

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10592-nightmare-bosses/
Share on other sites

What Bossman SHOULD have done is explain WHY 'BCA' is better than 'ABC' in his opinion, not treat it as a contest and also allow for difference in style.

Inexperienced Boss perhaps, or, Katie, your text was really bad and you just can't see it (but we know that's not the case).

As a Boss you can impose what you want but the things you explain / qualify are the ones that get accepted.

I'd say in general Katie, challenging your boss is generally not a good tactic. Support your boss despite his/her apparent shortcomings and if you are better than him/her then in the long run people will see this and you will succeed.


I'd say the most important thing is to look around the firm you work for and decide if you were in his/her job then is it the sort of job that is worth waiting 5 years for. If it is, then take the flak and play the long game.

don't listen to him.

Tell your boss hes a complete cunt and then get a job somewhere that your talents are appreciated, proabably a job where your ability to decide between ACB and BAC are key.

Then when you are king of CABBACland visiting bossisatwatland, give him a pitying look, but don't talk to him or engage in any way, ooooh no.

I...


..had a sales director / boss who said the following things...


"I know it's irritating but I am always right..."


"I measure my success in handbags "


"My husband hardly talks, he's virtually autistic "


( When she wasn't around he spoke just fine, she just bullied him into silence)


All in a really nasally Kiwi accent



Sad but true & she honestly believed them.


Hand on heart she was the nastiest bitch I have ever had to endure (& I was good at my job ) There was also an unspoken rule that if you wanted to get on you had to "fancy" her or at least pretend to, she made me cringe


At the Christmas parties she was a legendary groper of the male staff ( yes, even in front of her husband ), especially when the booze kicked in


Thankfully I only had to work with her for a 6 month contract




W**F


*shudders..*

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katie - you had to edit your own post about your

> boss asking you to edit something? :)



Mick Mac, ha ha - yes I had to edit it because I realised what began as 'boss' had become....in my eagerness.....shall we say, a bit more specific. Ooops :-$

My boss is 5'2 and he tries to bully/cop a feel/insult the female members of staff.


He does a jokey sort of squeeze hug thing and a kind of elbow nudge thing which is really irritating, so I actually did a jokey kind of headlock on him to let him know if it's ok for him to become overfamiliar then he can't complain if we also overstep the mark!


It was very funny and my colleagues thought i'd get the sack, but I'm still there!


He stopped being a wanker for about a week, before normal service was resumed!

A long time ago boss attempted to say in an interview what you put in to the company, you'll get out. Work hard and you'll get the rewards. Not and we'll not put up with it.


Unfortunately he phrased the second part as "You feck me and I'll feck you". She walked out, her big boyfriend arrived half an hour later, my how we laughed.

Most of the bosses I have worked for I was cleverer, quicker, and more astute than, eventually I realized I was insufferable as an employee, so I became a boss and have run businesses for 40 years.


I am now an insufferable boss about to retire, and I no longer have to put up with uppity employees who think they know the job better than I, but are too gutless to start their own thing.


Katie I sympathise with your predicament and understand how demeaning it is to be subserviant to a boss who appears an oafish buffoon but if you are soooo clever, do your own thing and start your own business.


Swallowing the company line always stuck in my throat, and I was forever baulking at the narrow perameters a job held, I found it was just too stifling for my overbearing, obnoxious know-it-all personality.


Best of luck in what ever venture you choose for the future.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Monday in one to one;

>

> Me: "I think the best approach for this is ABC"

>

> Boss: "No I don't like that"

>

> Tuesday in team meeting

>

> Boss: "Right everyone, I've had a think about this

> and the best aproach is ABC"



Console yourself in your next meeting by remembering that while there's no I in team, there is a u in cunt (that would be him the cunt, not you the cunt)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...