Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Asset - I'm genuinely curious to know why you think the train is more hygienic than the bus?


I work by the Tate Modern and used to take the bus/train/walk. Now, I find it more relaxing to take the 63/343 - the journey time's a bit longer but it gives me time for a good read and I'm more chilled by the time I get off. It's also cheaper.

I go with everyone else, it depends a lot on the time of day and also where you are getting the bus from. I get the 12 from Barry Road which means I always get a seat as its one of the first stops. I don't get off until Oxford street which means I get a whole journey to read / doze! It is also considerably cheaper than the train/tube options. However, timings are its downside - if I get the bus at 7.15 I can be at work within an hour, if I leave at 730 its at least 1.30 door to door and 745 is more like 2 hours mostly due to the number of school kids getting on and off the buses and general traffic.

Hope that helps, I say try it for a week or two and then decide what suits you best!

I thought that would get everyone going lol. I don't think trains are more hygenic, it's just an amusing name for buses ok with an element of truth attached. It's not that 'everyone on them is plague ridden' but a high turnover of passengers coughing and spluttering in an enclosed space and touching the grab rails the chance of germs being spread is fairly high.

I use buses fairly regularly as a matter of fact but why sit on a bus for over an hour when you can do the journey by train in under an hour?

Very helpful info; so thank you all. I will start my trial run mid week and see how it goes. I will miss my beloved car but am looking forward to a relaxing journey, with a seat especially if i leave before 7.45 (which i will have to anyway)...As for the run home; watch this space >:D
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Need to be in Gt Portland Street tomorrow morning. Don't have to be there until 10.30, but I won't be leaving until about 9.15. Will be up by the Horniman.


So, what do you experienced commuters suggest? 176 into TCR and walk, or go the other way and get the 63/36 and change at E&C? Or some other route entirely.


TFLs site features the P4 heavily, either to Brixton and the tube, or HOP and all kinds of train/tube combos. Knowing that the P4 is never around when I need it, I'd rather go for a more regular option, and I'm hoping that little bit later that the bus will be fine.

The quickest way probably is to walk down to Forest Hill and take the Overground to Canada Water, switch to Jubilee line to Baker St and then the Met/H&C/Circle line around to GPC. Once you're at Forest Hill, that should only take about 40 minutes and the Overground trains come fairly regularly. It's also the cheapest way if you're going PAYG since it only counts as one z3-1 journey.


P4 at that time isn't great - the earlier buses get caught up in all the traffic through Dulwich Village and there can be big gaps in service. If you want to go that way, then I'd go with Loz - take whichever bus comes first (if you walk down to LL/WV stop, you can get either 363 or 176) and go via E&C although that often seems to take around 40 minutes just to get to Elephant so you will take longer.

The Overground feels slightly less like a Tube given that it's pretty wide and you can walk right through - and the transfer to the Jubilee is easy post-rush hour; why they didn't put in 3 escalators at Canada Water, I'll never know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...