Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if a particiular story I read in one the papers yesterday was an early contender for April fools day most ludicrous story of the year competition, or true. Apparently a local authority is putting padding around lamp posts and street signs to protect people from bumping into them whilst texting on their phones. Call me old fashioned, but if a person wishes to make a complete arse of themselves by not paying attention while they are out walking, isn't that their problem for being so bloody stupid?? If they are that irresponsible let them crack their heads open, which may teach them a hard but unforgettable lesson. Harsh but fair.

Apparently him and McGuinness were known at Stormont as the "Chuckle Brothers" due to how well they actually got on and all the jokes they cracked!


Paisley: A prostestant and a catholic go into a bar....

McGuinness:....KABOOM!

Both: hahahahahahaha


F?$kin' hilarious I bet.

atila the gooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not sure if a particiular story I read in one the papers yesterday was an early contender for April fools day most ludicrous story of the year competition, or true. Apparently a local authority is putting padding around lamp posts and street signs to protect people from bumping into them whilst texting on their phones. Call me old fashioned, but if a person wishes to make a complete arse of themselves by not paying attention while they are out walking, isn't that

> their problem for being so bloody stupid?? If they are that irresponsible let them crack their heads open, which may teach them a hard but unforgettable lesson. Harsh but fair.



Not really sure why, but that reminded me of a few years ago when all the tactile paving (bumpy pavement to tell blind people they're near a crossing point) in Wimbledon was filed down because all the old dears were complaining to the council that it was hurting their feet!

Keef, you may mock, but let me tell you, when i've been wearing heels all day and the balls of my feet are burning - that tactile pavement (never knew it was called that - nice) can play bloody murder. A bit like taking a meat tenderiser to my poor feet. Converse are as bad - very thin soles

I really should give up reading papers because some of the stories make me extremely angry, like the one I'm about to launch into a rant about.

A feral bag of shite from Bolton, called Joseph Booth and a 15 year old who can't be named for legal reasons (EH!!! He can kill a human but can't have his named publicised, fecking hell, give me strength), kicked and punched an innocent man to death. The victim was so badly beaten that his family couldn't recognise him. And what, you might ask, has the judge recommended by way of a sentence for this piece of shite. A 12 year minimum. This guy had also removed a tagging device hours before the fatal attack.

Well I for one would happily inject this vermin with a lethal injection, but it would be too good for him. I'd let the victims family loose on the bastard and let them kick him to death if they see fit to do so. The murderer has taken a mans most precious gift, his life, and should have his taken in return. The murderer is effluent and should be disposed of accordingly. His victim has no second chance and the lives of his family have been shattered beyond repair. Why give such vermin a second chance? Get shot of him and good riddance to bad rubbish. Phew!!! I feel better for that, shame the victims family won't ever have their son/brother back.

I want EVERYONE accused of ANYTHING - including me - to have their accusations written up in the tabloids


THEN - I don't want no steeenking trial - I want the readers to judge me with only the article in front of them - none of that fancy evidence stuff


And not only do I want the same people to sentence me - I ONLY want them to do so when they have JUST read the article and are at their MOST upset

If we're going to talk Bringing Back Hanging, I loved the idea that if it goes to referendum, everyone who will have voted yes gets their name put into a hat, and every time there's a miscarriage of justice, a name gets drawn from the hat and they get executed as recompense for their part in having taken the innocent man's life.

Very fitting.

The thing is with this case is that the guy gave himself up after he had beaten and kicked the guy to death, so no miscarriage of justice here, and no tears from me if the guy was executed. Again, why worry about a killer, our thoughts should be with the family who have lost a son, and brother.

I'm not especially worried about a killer Atila


I would worry about society in general if we regressed from the current justice system back to a time when mob-rule, err... ruled the land however. You would be going some to show that society wasn't much more violent back in dem days


So given the 2 options, I'll stick with the current rule of law. That doesn't put me on the side of killers thangyouvermuch

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...