Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

Guido is four hours into lunch but word is going round that Cable might not be long for this world. Politically that is.


He?s in a meeting with Clegg?


UPDATE: Mr Cable has just walked into Downing Street. Looking as miserable as ever.


UPDATE II: Last tango in Whitehall. Seems Cable held the rose in his lip and bit too deeply.


UPDATE III: Corks popping in Tory circles.


UPDATE IV: Seems the nuclear option bombed?


UPDATE V: Grovelling apology at the eleventh hour? It?s chaos? Guido is hearing twenty different rumours, either way Cable is deeply wounded. BBC says he won?t be waltzing away?

  • 1 year later...

The simple answer would be that he is unable to fulfil his duties as captain with this cloud over him rather than a suspicion that he is guilty and being treated as such.


Huhne is the same. You cannot be a Sec of State whilst fighting criminal charges.

I'm glad Huhne's gone..maybe they'll get someone in into his post (environment) who isn't so keen on burdening british businesses (especially manufacturing) with massive 'tax' in the form of expensive green energy and thus further underminding our competitiveness and actually doing bugger all for the environment other than exportiing the pollution to foreighn manufacturers who undercut us partly as a result of their far cheaper carbon energy use...still makes the usual supects comfortably smug as we get further left behind global trade. Still Evenn more amazing as many of the 'progressives' are always decrying the death of our manufacturing yet they want to add on costs with 'lovely' (read unreliable expensive) wind farm produced electricity. 'Progressives' in not really thinking things through shocker.

I'm not THAT dim. You even reference Huhne so I know that's who you're talking about. Or rather using his resignation to launch yet another cliched attack on "progressives". Who are they by the way? Is there a club? And what exactly is so wrong with them? But it doesn't matter does it?


It's just a paint-by-numbers, lazy terminology you like to bandy about to attack anyone who fits the hackneyed, one-dimensional stereotype that you fixate and froth over.


Are you really interested in debating climate change? Or how to improve the competitiveness of British manufacturing? Or merely metaphorically gobbing in the general direction of "progressives"? I suspect I know the answer. But I'm not that observant.


The bitterest irony is that for as long as you've been on here you constantly bemoan being stereotyped as some raving right-winger and that any who dares break the hegemonic thought on immigration, Europe, law and order etc is branded a Daily Mail reader and the battle is a hopeless one. Yet instead of practising what you preach you're just as bad.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not THAT dim. You even reference Huhne so I

> know that's who you're talking about. Or rather

> using his resignation to launch yet another

> cliched attack on "progressives". Who are they by

> the way? Is there a club?


Yeah, quids, you should really use the correct terminology: it's 'unbathed, looney, sandal-wearing, smug leftie".

Come on David


I contribute plenty of serious stuff in the Drawing Room and elsewhere, even when an honest invitation to debate results in a pile of vitriolic, frothing at the mouth slurring (to mention no names).


I'm regularly in the economic debates, don't see you much in them but being a socialist I guess you've no interest in Economimcs ;-)


I hold impeccably liberal views on the death penalty, racism and foreighn aid to name but 3. (ooh and Foie Gras by the way)


I'm happy to have a seriuos debate on Climate Change but suspect that our views on that are ther same, it's happening and it's man made, but for the interest of our economic well being AND THE FUTURE OF OUR WELFARE STATE I'm not that keen that we export our jobs and pollution to competitor economies that couldn't give a fig. I'm also in the 'bridging' theory that we use Carbon based fuels for now (and for me Nuclear too), especially the cleaner ones combined with cleaner technology, whilst we try and develop non-carbon based ones that can actually match our demand - we are miles away from this at the moment.


We have a platform for developing efficient manufacturing, it's our modern high-tech industries (including car manufacturing) it's where all the workforce work in partnership to try and develop profits, decent working conditions and rfair pay and jobs (ie Honda in Swindon/Nissan in the NE)and not one where belligerent communist/socialist union fight outdated battles from eons ago. (a la Bob Crow and half the Public Sector ones)

*chalks one to d_c, rubs it out, swears under his breath, reconsiders, chalks one to d_c"


Aside from taking the piss, I'm quite interested in this one:


"burdening british businesses (especially manufacturing) with massive 'tax' in the form of expensive green energy and thus further underminding our competitiveness"


I'm assuming that this isn't a rant, so I'd be quite keen on knowing what this is, how it's being paid, who is paying it and how much it is?


In my pathetic existence as a small business chap, I'm aggravated by the price of energy... BUT it's a tiny fraction of my monthly overheads, for instance it wouldn't even pay for half a day of one of my employees.


So it has no impact on my competitiveness compared with, say, having a hangover ;-) If you bung it up to a 10% surcharge it still wouldn't have a greater impact than an extra 5 minutes in the shitter and a swift fag in the carpark.

I think most manfacturers have already realised that the only way to print money by making stuff is to get it done by third world indentured slaves, nothing to do with a massive tax for expensive green energy.


Anyway, sorry to nag, but what is the 'massive tax for green energy'.


I've done a search and can't seem to identify it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...